Pembiaran Pada Potensi Konflik dan Kontestasi Semu Pemilukada Kota Blitar: Analisis Institusionalisme Pilihan Rasional

Moh. Fajar Shodiq Ramadlan(1), Tri Hendra Wahyudi(2),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i2.6581


(1) Universitas Brawijaya
(2) Universitas Brawijaya

Abstract

The simultaneous local election is the new step of democratization in Indonesia. Viewing an implementation about the local election in each district which have many of potential conflict and unrest, conflict managements required to anticipate a potential conflict. This paper will suggest to describe about conflict management of the local election in Blitar City using an rational choice institutionalism approach, assuming that institutions has a capacity to solve a problem of conflict management in the local election. Blitar city been selected because it has a particular aspect that the two candidates, namely by incumbent and independent, but the contestation is pseudo-contestation. This paper is the result of exploratory qualitative research. The techniques to explore data is use focus group discussion that involved an institutions related with Blitar local election. Belong this research, the institutions that related in the local elections understand a potential conflict, but the selected conflict management is avoiding method.

Keywords

Local Election; Conflict Managemen; Pseudo-Contestation; Avoiding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Antaranews.com. 2015. Petahana Samanhudi-Santoso Menangi Pilkada Kota Blitar. Diakses di http://www.antaranews. com/berita/535443/petahana-samanhu di-santoso-menangi-Pemilukada-kota-blitar pada 27 Desember 2015.

Budiardjo, M. (2003). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Gramedia pustaka utama.

Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1985). The managerial grid III: The key to leadership excellence.

Cai, D., & Fink, E. (2002). Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists. Communication Monographs, 69 (1), 67-87.

Clarke, P. A., & Foweraker, J. (2001). Encyclopedia of democratic thought. Taylor & Francis.

Fisher, Simon., et.al, 2000. Mengelola Konflik Ketrampilan dan Strategi Untuk Bertindak, terj. S.N. Karikasari dkk., Jakarta: The British Council Responding to Conflict.

Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political studies, 44(5), 936-957.

Haris, S. (2005). Mengelola Potensi Konflik Pilkada, Kompas tanggal 10 Me 2005i.

Peters, B. G. (2011). Institutional theory in political science: the new institutionalism. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (2004). Teori Konflik Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Somekh, B., & Lewin, C. (Eds.). (2011). Theory and methods in social research. Sage.

Suprapto, S. (2013). Revitalisasi Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Bagi Upaya Resolusi Konflik. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 21(1), 19-38.

Tempo.co. 2015. Pemilukada Sepi, Dua Calon Wali Kota Blitar Menolak Kampanye. Diakses di http://nasional. tempo.co/read/news/2015/09/02/058697350/Pemilukada-sepi-dua-calon-wa li-kota-di-blitar-menolak-kampanye pada 1 November 2015

Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of organizational behavior, 13(3), 265-274.

Urbaningrum, A. (1999). Ranjau-ranjau Reformasi; Potret Konflik Politik Pasca Kejatuhan Soeharto, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wallensteen, P. (2006). Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System (Arabic edition).

Wiradi, G. (2000). Reforma agraria: perjalanan yang belum berakhir. Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria, Sajogyo Institute.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2016 Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/