Komunikasi Politik Kepala Desa dalam Mendorong Inovasi Pembangunan Desa: Studi Kasus Tiga Desa di Lereng Gunung Ungaran, Jawa Tengah
(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Indonesian Institute for Development and Social Studies
(4) Indonesian Institute for Development and Social Studies
Abstract
Communication is a strategy to deliver information to the public and medium to develop a good will in citizen both human and infrastructure development. Good communication must be acquired by many stakeholders of the citizen in all hierarchy of the government; one of them is the village headman. The village headman as a stakeholder of the village is required to be able to interact properly in term of communication and village development. Innovation and ideas about latest development cannot run properly without good communication between village headman, community leaders and villagers. This study investigated the communication style done by the village headman. It was conducted in village Kalisidi, Gonoharjo and Diwak. As the result, there are some communication style done in these villages among stake holders and the citizen. They are: (1) A direct approach to the society (informal communication to village communities); (2) Approach among Village Community Institutions (communication group of community and communication networks); (3) Public Communication by using Social Media, and (4) Public Information Board as a medium to inform village annual budget as a form of transparency and socialization of village resort and rural education movement.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Antlöv, H. (2003). Village government and rural development in Indonesia: The new democratic framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193-214.
Curran, J. (2002). Media and power. Psychology Press. Dwipayana, A., & Eko, S. (2003). Membangun Good Governance di Desa. Jogjakarta: Institusi for Research and Empowerment.
Eko, S. (2014). Desa Membangun Indonesia. FPPD. Yogyakarta.
Hamad, I. (2010). Media dan Demokrasi di Asia Tenggara: Kasus Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia.
Juliantara, D. (2000). Arus Bawah Demokrasi: otonomi dan pemberdayaan desa. Lapera, Yogyakarta.
Maskun, S. (1994). Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa: Asas. Kebijakan dan Manajemen, PT Media Widya Mandala, Yogyakarta.
Permatasari, Dessi dan Cahyo Seftyono (2014), Musyawarah Mufakat atau Pemilihan Lewat Suara Mayoritas? Diskursus Pola Demokrasi di Indonesia, Mimbar Demokrasi, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 1-13.
Seftyono, C. (2014). Rawa Pening Dalam Perspektif Politik Lingkungan: Sebuah Kajian Awal. Indonesian Journal of Conservation, 3 (1).
Seftyono, C. (2010). Local Community in Valuing Ecosystem Services: Warga Kampung Code's Perspective on Kali Code Existence.
Seftyono, C. (2011). Pengetahuan Ekologi Tradisional Masyarakat Orang Asli Jakun dalam Menilai Ekosistem Servis di Tasik Chini, Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 15(1), 55-67.
Seftyono, C., Arumsari, N., Arditama, E., & Luthfi, M. (2017) Kepemimpinan Desa dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Aras Lokal: Kajian Awal Di Tiga Desa di Lereng Gunung Ungaran, Jawa Tengah. Otoritas, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6 (2), 60-70. (In Press)
Suharyanto, S., & Sofianto, A. (2015). Model Pembangunan Desa Terpadu Inovatif Di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 4 (4), 251-260.
Suroso, H., Hakim, A., & Noor, I. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Di Desa Banjaran Kecamatan Driyorejo Kabupaten Gresik. WACANA, Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 17 (1), 7-15.
Widjaja, H. A. W. (2003). Otonomi desa merupakan otonomi yang asli, bulat dan utuh. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Yusuf, I. A. (2011). Media Lokal dalam Konstelasi Komunikasi Politik di Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 14 (3), 297-316.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/