Active Learning Strategies in the Environmental Engineering Course: A Case Study at Curtin University Malaysia

T. Hadibarata, R. Rubiyatno

Abstract

The current teaching approach of the undergraduate subject is very dependent on conventional methods, in which less participation and contribution of the students during the learning process. Active learning refers to any approach to instruction in which all students are required to involve in the learning process. The objective of the manuscript is to evaluate the application of active learning in teaching the compulsory course in environmental engineering department curriculum, Curtin University Malaysia. Green engineering is a mandatory unit in 3rd year of Department of Environmental Engineering. That is an approach of the design, process, product, and commercialization that follow environmentally conscious attitude, principles and values combined with multi-disciplinary engineering science in order to minimize pollutant and promote local and global sustainability. Experts have developed a simple approach that connecting the classical lecture-presentation and active engagement of the students with the course materials through Problem-Based Learning, Interactive Class Learning, and Project-Based Learning. Introducing the active learning to the students on solving problems have improved the students’ ability in achieving the course objectives and also the program objectives of the Department of Environmental Engineering, Curtin University Malaysia. The attainment of each assessment by the students and student evaluations indicated that the students’ achievement and retention of information have greatly improved. This improvement includes high student attendance and participation, high grades, and great student satisfaction.

Keywords

environmental engineering, problem-based learning, interactive class learning, project-based learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afrasiabifar, A., & Asadolah, M. (2019). Effectiveness of shifting traditional lecture to interactive lecture to teach nursing students. Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria, 37(1), 60-69.

Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (1998). Green chemistry. Frontiers, 640.

Andraos, J., & Dicks, A. P. (2015). The State of Green Chemistry Instruction at Canadian Universities. In Worldwide Trends in Green Chemistry Education (pp. 179-212).

Armstrong, L. B., Rivas, M. C., Douskey, M. C., & Baranger, A. M. (2018). Teaching students the complexity of green chemistry and assessing growth in attitudes and understanding. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 61-67.

Bernard, J., Hutter, M., Zeppelzauer, M., Fellner, D., & Sedlmair, M. (2017). Comparing visual-interactive labeling with active learning: An experimental study. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 24(1), 298-308.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.

Carbogim, F. D. C., Oliveira, L. B. D., Toledo, M. M., Diaz, F. B. B. D. S., Bittencourt, G. K. G. D., & Püschel, V. A. D. A. (2019). Active teaching model to promote critical thinking. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 72(1), 293-298.

Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23-33.

Godderidge, J. G., Wall, B. E., & Franklin, S. A. (2019). Creating an Efficient Learning Model: Students’ Perceptions and Outcomes of an Active Learning Fixed Prosthodontics Course. Journal of dental education, JDE-019.

Gordy, X. Z., Zhang, L., Sullivan, A. L., & Carr, E. O. (2018). Teaching and learning in an active learning classroom: A mixed-methods case study. Journal of the Mississippi Academy of Sciences, 63(S1), 237-244.

Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118.

Jafari, Z. (2014). A comparison of conventional lecture and team-based learning methods in terms of student learning and teaching satisfaction. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 28, 5.

Johnson, K. M. (2019). Implementing inclusive practices in an active learning STEM classroom.

Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Sinniah, D. (2016). The role of green chemistry activities in fostering secondary school students’ understanding of acid-base concepts and argumentation skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 893-901.

Keegan, R. D., Brown, G. R., & Gordon, A. (2012). Use of a simulation of the ventilator-patient interaction as an active learning exercise: comparison with traditional lecture. Journal of veterinary medical education, 39(4), 359-367.

Lee, S. S., & McManaman-Bridges, T. (2019). Using Active Learning Strategies to Increase Understanding of Mental Health Concepts. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(6), 375-376.

Lumpkin, A., Achen, R., & Dodd, R. (2015). Focusing teaching on students: examining student perceptions of learning strategies. Quest, 67(4), 352-366.

Maldonado, R., & Harabagiu, S. M. (2019). Active Deep Learning for the Identification of Concepts and Relations in Electroencephalography Reports. Journal of biomedical informatics, 103265.

Mohamad, S., Sayed-Mouchaweh, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2018). Active learning for classifying data streams with unknown number of classes. Neural Networks, 98, 1-15.

Powell, J. M., Murray, I. V., Johal, J., & Elks, M. L. (2019). Effect of a small-group, active learning, tutorial-based, in-course enrichment program on student performance in medical physiology. Advances in physiology education, 43(3), 339-344.

Rauch, F. (2015). Education for sustainable development and chemistry education. Worldwide trends in green chemistry education, 16-26.

Sharpton, R. A., Frank, S. Y., & Shoair, O. A. (2019). Comparison of pharmacy students’ perceptions and attitudes toward spirometry first-hand experience versus paper-based active learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 192-197.

Sheldon, R. A. (2016). Engineering a more sustainable world through catalysis and green chemistry. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 13(116), 20160087.

Styers, M. L., Van Zandt, P. A., & Hayden, K. L. (2018). Active learning in flipped life science courses promotes development of critical thinking skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar39.

Wang, M. Y., Li, X. Y., & He, L. N. (2018). Green chemistry education and activity in China. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 123-129.

Wilson, J. A., Pegram, A. H., Battise, D. M., & Robinson, A. M. (2017). Traditional lecture versus Jigsaw learning method for Teaching Medication Therapy Management (MTM) core elements. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(6), 1151-1159.

Xue, Y., & Hauskrecht, M. (2018, May). Active Learning of Multi-Class Classifiers with Auxiliary Probabilistic Information. In The Thirty-First International Flairs Conference.

Zuin, V., & Mammino, L. (Eds.). (2015). Worldwide Trends in Green Chemistry Education. Royal Society of Chemistry.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.