Merry Go Round Technique and Students’ Physics Cognitive Learning Outcomes on Work and Energy Topic
Abstract
This study aims to determine the difference in learning outcomes in work and energy from students who learned using inquiry training model with merry-go-round techniques. This study was designed using a quasi-experimental design with 74 students as samples. The instrument developed was 21 questions about work and energy. The results show that the experimental class has the highest value of 85.27 compared to the control class with 77.56. The test results of the physics learning outcomes hypothesis were tcount (3,295) >ttable (1,666), indicating that there were differences in physics learning outcomes of students who studied using the inquiry training model with the merry-go-round technique than students who studied conventionally.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agra, G., Formiga, N. S., Oliveira, P. S. D., Costa, M. M. L., Fernandes, M. D. G. M., & Nóbrega, M. M. L. D. (2019). Analysis of the concept of Meaningful Learning in light of the Ausubel's Theory. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 72(1), 248-255.
Ahmadi, N., & Besançon, M. (2017). Creativity as a stepping stone towards developing other competencies in classrooms. Education Research International, 2017, 1–9.
Arsal, Z. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1326-1338.
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-12.
Batong, J. S. T., & Wilujeng, I. (2018, September). Developing web-students' worksheet based on inquiry training for increase science literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012021). IOP Publishing.
Bezen, S., Aykutlu, I., & Bayrak, C. (2016). Conceptual Comprehension of Pre-Service Physics Teachers Towards 1st Law of Thermodynamics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(1), 55-75.
Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Fiorentini, C., Falsini, P., & Stefanelli, F. (2018). The influence of teaching approach on students' conceptual learning in physics. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2474.
Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2019). Educational assessment of students. Pearson publications.
Büyükdede, M., & Tanel, R. (2019). Effect Of The Stem Activities Related To Work-Energy Topics On Academic Achievement And Prospective Teachers' Opinions On Stem Activities. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 507.
Caswell, C. J., & LaBrie, D. J. (2017). Inquiry based learning from the learner's point of view: a teacher candidate's success story. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 7(2), 161-186.
Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist, 49(4), 219-243.
Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-18.
Cruz-Guzmán, M., García-Carmona, A., & Criado, A. M. (2018). Proposing Questions for Scientific Inquiry and the Selection of Science Content in Initial Elementary Education Teacher Training. Research in Science Education, 1-23.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
De Hei, M., Admiraal, W., Sjoer, E., & Strijbos, J. W. (2018). Group learning activities and perceived learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2354-2370.
Haidar, D. A., Yuliati, L., & Handayanto, S. K. (2020). The Effect of Inquiry Learning with Scaffolding on Misconception of Light Material among Fourth-Grade Students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 540-553.
Helmreich, J. E., & Krog, K. P. (2018). Ordinary Least Squares and Quantile Regression: An Inquiry-Based Learning Approach to a Comparison of Regression Methods. PRIMUS, 28(3), 206-222.
Hong, J. C., Tsai, C. R., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Chu, K. C., Gu, J., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2019). The effect of the "prediction-observation-quiz-explanation" inquiry-based e-learning model on flow experience in green energy learning. Computers & Education, 133, 127-138.
Karagiannopoulou, E., & Entwistle, N. (2019). Students' Learning Characteristics, Perceptions of Small-Group University Teaching, and Understanding Through a "Meeting of Minds". Frontiers in psychology, 10, 444.
Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical review physics education research, 13(1), 010109.
Kurnaz, M. A., & Arslan, A. S. (2014). Effectiveness of multiple representations for learning energy concepts: Case of Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 627-632.
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., & Viiri, J. (2018). Visualising the temporal aspects of collaborative inquiry-based learning processes in technology-enhanced physics learning. International Journal of science education, 40(14), 1697-1717.
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122.
Lestari, D., Budi, A. S., & Budi, E. (2019, March). Cognitive learning outcomes of physics in national curriculum of Indonesia and International baccalaureate. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1170, No. 1, p. 012033). IOP Publishing.
Medina, M. S., Castleberry, A. N., & Persky, A. M. (2017). Strategies for improving learner metacognition in health professional education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(4).
Naezak, N., Savitri, E., & Fibriana, F. (2021). Simple Terrarium Teaching Aid for Guided Inquiry Learning Model: The Development of Learning Instruments to Students' Concept Understanding in Global Warming and Environmental Awareness. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(2), 51-59.
Oakes, J., Pols, R., & Lawn, S. (2019). The 'Merry-Go-Round'of Habitual Relapse: A Qualitative Study of Relapse in Electronic Gaming Machine Problem Gambling. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(16), 2858.
Owens, M. T., & Tanner, K. D. (2017). Teaching as brain changing: Exploring connections between neuroscience and innovative teaching. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), fe2.
Pandya, R. (2018). Synthetical Review: Effectiveness of Inquiry Training Model for the Teaching of Mathematics. International Journal of Research in all Subjects in Multi Languages, 6(5), 21-24.
Saunders-Stewart, K. S., Gyles, P. D., & Shore, B. M. (2012). Student outcomes in inquiry instruction: A literature-derived inventory. Journal of advanced academics, 23(1), 5-31.
Smit, R., Weitzel, H., Blank, R., Rietz, F., Tardent, J., & Robin, N. (2017). Interplay of secondary pre-service teacher content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and attitudes regarding scientific inquiry teaching within teacher training. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(4), 477-499.
Tambunan, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students' Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293-302.
Van Uum, M. S., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International journal of science education, 38(3), 450-469.
Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2017). How Are The Physics Critical Thinking Skills of The Students Taught by Using Inquiry-Discovery Through Empirical and Theorethical Overview?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691-697.
Yakar, Z., & Baykara, H. (2014). Inquiry-based laboratory practices in a science teacher training program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 173-183.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
