The Impact of Guided Inquiry Learning with Digital Swing Model on Students’ Generic Science Skill

N. Khoiri, C. Huda, A. Rusilowati, W. Wiyanto, S. Sulhadi, A. G. C. Wicaksono

Abstract

The low condition of students’ Generic Science Skills (GSS) becoming a concern since GSS is an essential provision for millennial living in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0. The study aimed to measure the impact of guided inquiry learning on generic science skills by using the digital swing model. This research used the experimental method which involved 360 students of 12th grade from senior high school. The primary data of students’ GSS were obtained from observations during activities and reports of practicum activities, then the resulting data were analyzed by t-test. The average of students’ GSS in the experimental class was 3.32, which is included in the very good category. Meanwhile in the control class was 3.17, which is included in the good category. Based on the results of the t-test analysis, the score was 0.044, which means that there were differences between the experimental class and the control class. Thus, it can be concluded that the use of digital swing has a positive impact on students’ GGS. The use of digital swing could stimulate the students to do the practicum activities which leads to the improvement of student’s GGS. However, this study is only focusing on the smaller angle; therefore, it is crucial for further research to set up the digital swing with the angle >15° to identify the effect on it.

Keywords

inquiry; digital swing; generic science skill

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adhim, A. Y., & Jatmiko, B. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery dengan Kegiatan Laboratorium untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA pada Materi Suhu Dan Kalor. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 4(3).

Annisa, N. H., & Sudarmin, S. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Berbantuan Diagram Vee Terhadap Keterampilan Generik Sains Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 10(1).

Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Bogar, Y. (2019). Synthesis Study on Argumentation in Science Education. International Education Studies, 12(9), 1-14.

Brachem, J. C., & Braun, E. M. (2018). Job-related requirements and competences of educational science graduates. Journal of further and higher education, 42(2), 166-176.

Brotosiswoyo, B. S. (2000). Hakikat Pembelajaran Fisika di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Proyek.

Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12),1937-1959.

Chase, A., Pakhira, D., & Stains, M. (2013). Implementing process-oriented, guided-inquiry learning for the first time: Adaptations and

short-term impacts on students’ attitude and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(4), 409-416.

Cheung, D. (2011). Teacher beliefs about implementing guided-inquiry laboratory experiments for secondary school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(11), 1462-1468.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & education, 106, 83-96.

Fitriani, E. Y., & Fibriana, F. (2020). Analysis of Religious Characters and Logical Thinking Skills After Using Solar System Teaching Material Integrated with Islamic Science. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 69-76.

Furberg, A. (2016). Teacher support in computersupported lab work: Bridging the gap between lab experiments and students’ conceptual understanding. International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 89-113.

Ghani, I. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry education research and practice, 18(4), 849-874.

Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019). Student-questionbased inquiry in science education. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 1-36.

Imastuti, I., Wiyanto, W., & Sugianto, S. (2016). Pemanfaatan Laboratorium dalam Pembelajaran Fisika SMA/MA Se-Kota Salatiga. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(3), 51-58.

Kazempour, M. (2018). Elementary preservice teachers’ authentic inquiry experiences and reflections: A multicase study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(7), 644-663.

Khabibah, E., Masykuri, M., & Maridi, M. (2017, October). The Analysis of Generic Science Skills of High School Students. In International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017). Atlantis Press.

Khoiri, N., Rusilowati, A., & Jafar, R. (2020, June). Generic skills pattern of physical teacher’s candidate through design of school physics practicum guidelines. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1567, No. 3, p. 032091). IOP Publishing.

Kluge, A. (2014). Combining laboratory experiments with digital tools to do scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2157-2179.

Kuehn, B. M. (2013). Groups experiment with digital tools for patient consent. JAMA, 310(7), 678-680.

Lotter, C. R., Thompson, S., Dickenson, T. S., Smiley, W. F., Blue, G., & Rea, M. (2018). The impact of a practice-teaching professional development model on teachers’ inquiry instruction and inquiry efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 255-273.

Maknun, J. (2015). The implementation of generative learning model on physics lesson to increase mastery concepts and generic science skills of vocational students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 742-748.

McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & Constantinou, C. P. (2000). Preparing teachers to teach physics and physical science by inquiry. Physics Education, 35(6), 411.

Nastiti, D., Rahardjo, S. B., VH, E. S., & Perdana, R. (2018). The Need Analysis of Module Development Based on Search, Solve, Create, and Share to Increase Generic Science Skills in Chemistry. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 428-434.

Nikmah, S., Hartono, H., & Sujarwata, S. (2017). Kesiapan dan Pemanfaatan Laboratorium dalam Mendukung Pembelajaran Fisika SMA di Kabupaten Brebes. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education

Journal, 6(1), 1-8.

Pujani, N. M., Suma, K., Sadia, W., & Wijaya, A. F. C. (2018). Applying Collaborative Ranking Tasks to Improve Students’ Concept Mastery and Generic Science Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 293-301.

Rakhmawan, A., Setiabudi, A., & Mudzakir, A. (2015). Perancangan pembelajaran literasi sains berbasis inkuiri pada kegiatan laboratorium. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1), 143-152.

Saprudin, S., & Sutarno, S. (2018). Developing Generic Science Skills of Prospective Teacher through Offline and Online Interactive Multimedia in Physics Learning.

Sarkar, M., Overton, T., Thompson, C. D., & Rayner, G. (2020). Academics’ perspectives of the teaching and development of generic employability skills in science curricula. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2), 346-361.

Siswanto, J., Saefan, J., Suparmi, S., & Cari, C. (2016). The effectiveness of e-Lab to improve generic science skills and understanding the concept of physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12(1), 33-40.

Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2017). ‘Hard science’: a career option for socially and societally interested students? Grade 12 students’ vocational interest gap explored. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2304-2320.

Sudarmin, S., Sumarni, W., Zahro, L., Diba, P. F., & Rosita, A. (2018). The Development of Learning Chemistry Module Integrated with Green Chemistry and Ethnoscience to Development of Students’ Generic Science Skills and Soft Skills of Conservation in Central Java. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 41.

Susilawati, S., Khoiri, N., Wijayanto, W., Masturi, M., & Xaphakdy, S. (2018). Learning Experience of Pre-Service Physics Teachers in Developing Simple Project Loaded by Life Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 122-129.

Trinter, C. (2016). The Importance of Theoretical Frameworks and Mathematical Constructs in Designing Digital Tools. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 35(3), 269-

Turner, R. C., Keiffer, E. A., & Salamo, G. J. (2018). Observing Inquiry-Based Learning Environments Using the Scholastic Inquiry Observation Instrument. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1455-1478.

Ünlü, Z. K., & Dökme, İ. (2020). The Effect of Technology-Supported Inquiry-Based Learning in Science Education: Action Research. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 6(2), 120-133.

Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217-227.

Wahyuni, I., & Amdani, K. (2016). Influence Based Learning Program Scientific Learning Approach to Science Students Generic Skills.

Walan, S. (2020). Embracing Digital Technology in Science Classrooms--Secondary School Teachers’ Enacted Teaching and Reflections on Practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 431-441.

Yu, K. C., Wu, P. H., & Fan, S. C. (2019). Structural relationships among high school students’ scientific knowledge, critical thinking, engineering design process, and design product. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-22.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26644

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share