PROFIL PENALARAN LOGIS BERDASARKAN GAYA BERPIKIR DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH FISIKA PESERTA DIDIK
Abstract
Telah dilakukan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui profil penalaran logis peserta didik yang memiliki gaya berpikir sekuensial konkret, sekuensial abstrak, acak konkret, acak abstrak dan perbedaannya dalam memecahkan masalah Fisika di MAN Baraka. Data yang diperoleh melalui hasil wawancara dan pekerjaan tertulis dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis data Model Miles dan Huberman. Hasil penelitian mendeskripsikan penalaran logis peserta didik yang memiliki gaya berpikir berbeda. Deskripsi utuh yang memuat seluruh komponen penalaran logis dan konektivitas setiap unsur dari profil dijabarkan dengan mind mapping. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh berupa profil penalaran logis peserta didik yang memiliki gaya berpikir berdampak pada kemampuan memecahkan masalah Fisika.
Â
A researchthat aims to determine the profile of logical reasoning of student who have a concrete suquential thinking style, sequential abstract, concrete random, abstract random and differences in solving physics promlems at MAN Baraka. Data obtained through interviews and written work were analyzed using data analysis Miles and Huberman model. The results describe the logical reasoning of student who have different thinking styles. Full description that contains all the components of logical reasoning and the connectivity of each element of the profile described by mind mapping. Conclusions obtained in the form of logical reasoning profile of student who have thinking styles impact to solving physics problems’ ability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bas, G., & Beyhan, O. 2010. Effects of Multiple Intelligences Supported Project-Based Learning on Students’ Achievement Levels and Attitudes Towards English Lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2 (3): 365 – 385.
Carson, J. 2007. A Problem With Problem Solving: Teaching Thinking Without Teaching Knowledge. The Mathematics Educator, 17 (2): 7–14.
Chase, M.W, et.al. 2007. Exploring the Relationship of First-year, Firstsemester College Students’ Mind Styles and their Consumer Decision-making Styles. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 25 (1): 10-23.
Chatif, M. 2012. Gurunya Manusia. Bandung: Penerbit Kaifa.
Denig, S.J. 2004. Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles: Two Complementary Dimensions. Teachers College Record, 106 (1): 96-111.
Fah, L.Y. 2009. LogicalThinking Abilities among Form 4 Students in the Interior Division of Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Science and Mathematics, Education in Southeast Asia, 32(2): 161-187.
Gregorc, A.F. 1982. An Adult’s Guide to Style. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Systems.
Hensberry, K.K.R. 2012. The effects of Polya’s heuristic and diary writing on children’s problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24: 59-85.
Lehman, M.E. 2011. Relationships of Learning Styles, Grades, an Instructional Preferences. NACTA Journal, 9: 40-45.
Mannamaa, M, et al. 2012. Cognitive Correlates of Math Skills in Third-grade Students. Educational Psychology, 32 (1): 21-44.
Marusic, Mirko& Slisko, Josip. 2012. Influence of Three Different Methods of Teaching Physics on the Gain in Students’ Development of Reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (2): 301-326.
Nurdin. 2010. Profil Alur Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Limit Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya. (Disertasi). Surabaya: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Pintrich, P.R. 2002. The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. College of Education, The Ohio State University, 41(4): 219–225.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Watson, S.A & Thompson, C. 2001. Learning Styles of Interior Design Students as Assessed by the Gregorc Style Delineator. Journal of Interior Design, 27(1): 12-19
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
