Implementation of 5E Plus Learning Model on Energy Subject Matter to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills
Abstract
Argumentation skills consist of 2 elements: skills to construct arguments and implement them. However, some studies show that students’ argumentation skills were low. This study proposed the 5E Plus learning model to improve students’ argumentation skills. The model consists of an element named Enliven and six syntaxes: Orientation, Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, and Evaluation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the 5E Plus learning model in improving students’ argumentation skills. This study used Energy subject matter (which consisted of 3 topics, Mechanical, Heat, and Electrical Energy). The study’s sample consisted of 40 1st semester college students from the Natural Science department and was taken randomly. We used One-Group Pretest-Posttest as a research design and collected data using an argumentation skills test. The data was examined using an Independent sample t-test to determine the effectiveness of the 5E Plus learning model. The results were: 1) the 5E Plus learning model was effective for improving students’ argumentation skills, 2) All components of students’ argumentation skills were successfully improved, which warrant experienced the highest improvement, 3) Students’ argumentation skills in all three topics were successfully improved, which in Mechanical Energy topic the skills experienced the highest improvement.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afandi, S. (2017). Stimulasi Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi; Konsep dan implementasinya dalam pembelajaran Abad 21. Surakarta: UPT.
Antonio, P. R., & Prudente, S. M. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in teaching antimicrobial resistance: Effects on students' conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192-217.
Bybee, R., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model. Arlington, TX: NSTA press.
Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Chitman-Booker, L., & Kopp, K. (2013). The 5Es of inquiry-based science. Teacher Created Materials.
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2021). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning from theory to practice. Springer International Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. (2003). Research design (pp. 155-179). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
El Majidi, A., Janssen, D., & de Graaff, R. (2021). The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education. System, 101, 102576.
Fakhriyah, F., & Masfuah, S. (2021, April). The analysis of scientific argumentation skill and computational thinking skill of the primary educational teacher department students. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2331, No. 1, p. 030005). AIP Publishing LLC.
Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1345-1357.
Friedrich, L., Bear, R., & Fox, T. (2018). For the sake of argument: An approach to teaching evidence-based writing. American Educator, 42(1), 18–23.
Garcia I Grau, F., Valls, C., Piqué, N., & Ruiz-Martín, H. (2021). The long-term effects of introducing the 5E model of instruction on students’ conceptual learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1441-1458.
Iordanou, K., & Rapanta, C. (2021). “Argue with me”: a method for developing argument skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631203.
Lazarou, D., Erduran, S., & Sutherland, R. (2017). Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity. Learning, culture and social interaction, 14, 51-66.
Lemay, D. J., Basnet, R. B., Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., & Saxena, A. (2021). Instructional interventions for computational thinking: examining the link between computational thinking and academic performance. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100056.
Lobczowski, N. G., Allen, E. M., Firetto, C. M., Greene, J. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2020). An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101925.
Masito, F., Oka, I., Cahyadi, C., Komalasari, Y., Anes, A., & Risdianto, E. (2022). Scientific Argumentation Skills Through The Rasch Model on Analysis of Survey Data on The Importance of Aviation Vocational Education in Indonesia. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 487-498.
Muntholib, M., Hidayati, K., Purnajanti, L., Utomo, Y., & Hariyanto, H. (2021, March). Impact of explicit scientific inquiry instruction on students’ scientific argumentation skills in salt hydrolysis. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1, p. 020045). AIP Publishing LLC.
Newell, G., Bloome, D., & Hirvela, A. (2015). Teaching and learning argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms. Routledge.
Noviyanti, N. I., Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019, June). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1241, No. 1, p. 012034). IOP Publishing.
Ong, E., Govindasamy, D., Swaran Singh, C., Ibrahim, M., Abdul Wahab, N., Borhan, M., & Tho, S. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 170-182.
Probosari, M. R., Ramli, M., Harlita, Indrowati, M., & Sajidan. (2016). Profil ketrampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan biologi FKIP UNS pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan. Bioedukasi, 9(1), 29-33.
Probosari, R., Widyastuti, F., Suranto, M., & Prayitno, B. (2017, October). Tracing the Development of Student's Argumentation in Science Classroom: Knowledge Acquisition and Motivation. In International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017) (pp. 602-608). Atlantis Press.
Rodriguez, S., Allen, K., Harron, J., & Qadri, S. A. (2019). Making and the 5E learning cycle. The Science Teacher, 86(5), 48-55.
Rohayati, Y. T., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Setiawan, D. (2020, April). The correlation between student scientific argumentation skills and cognitive achievement on PBL and RICOSRE learning models in biology classes. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215, No. 1, p. 030014). AIP Publishing LLC.
Setiawati, I., & Nurlaelah, I. (2017). ANALISIS PROFIL KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI GURU DAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI MENGGUNAKAN MODEL TOULMIN’ S ARGUMEN PATTERN (TAP) DAN UPAYA PERBAIKANNYA. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi, 9(01).
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1-22.
Sukardi, R. R., & Agustrianti, Y. V. (2017, January). Analysis of Students' Argumentation Skill and Conceptual Knowledge in Friction Force Lesson through Argumentative Task. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 80-84). Atlantis Press.
Sundari, H., & Febriyanti, R. H. (2021). The Analysis of Indonesian EFL Argumentative Writing Using Toulmin’s Model: The Structure and Struggles from the Learners. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(2), 67-78.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of ArgumentCambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116.
Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-9.
Utomo, Y. S. (2019, June). Argumentation Skills Profile on 8th Grade Students using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern on Controversial Topic. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1233, No. 1, p. 012095). IOP Publishing.
Wang, Y., & Jiang, W. (2018). An automatic classification and clustering algorithm for online learning goals based on cognitive thinking. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(11), 54-66.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
