Creative Thinking of Chemistry and Chemistry Education Students in Biochemistry Learning through Problem Based Learning with Scaffolding Strategy

M. D. W. Ernawati, S. Sudarmin, A. Asrial, D. Muhammad, H. Haryanto

Abstract

This study aimed to describe students' creative thinking skills in a problem-based learning model with scaffolding in the Biochemistry course. This is mixed-method research with an explanatory sequential research design with a sample of 173 students from the Chemistry Education and Chemistry study programs, Universitas Jambi. In this study, the researchers only used the experimental class. The sampling technique used is total sampling and purposive sampling. Data were collected using observation sheets, test instruments, interview instruments, and response questionnaires. Quantitative data analysis used is hypothesis testing in the form of ANOVA test with Post-Hoc Scheffe test and T-test. The findings of this study indicate that the ANOVA test results showed a significant difference in the average creative thinking (cognitive) test results and student response questionnaire results in scaffolding-based integrated biochemistry learning. In addition, there is also a significant effect between cognitive test results on student responses in scaffolding-based integrated biochemistry learning. So it can be concluded that there are differences in the creative thinking skills of chemistry education students and chemistry students in using scaffolding integrated problem-based learning models in Biochemistry courses.

Keywords

biochemistry; creative thinking; problem-based learning; scaffolding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Asrial, Syahrial, Maison, Kurniawan, D. A., Novianti, U., & Parhati, L. N. (2020). Local account analysis that can be integrated into the basic IPS competence in class VI basic school. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(5), 66–74.

Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer.

Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., & Kim, N. J. (2017a). A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis to Synthesize the Influence of Contexts of Scaffolding Use on Cognitive Outcomes in STEM Education. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1042–1081.

Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017b). Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344.

Belland, B. R., Weiss, D. M., & Kim, N. J. (2020). High school students’ agentic responses to modeling during problem-based learning. Journal of Educational Research, 113(5), 374–383.

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661.

Ceylan, Ö. (2020). The effect of the waste management themed summer program on gifted students’ environmental attitude, creative thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 22(1), 53-65.

Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, Y. F. (2019). The Impacts of Scaffolding E-Assessment English Learning: A Cognitive Style Perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1105-1127.

Creswell, J. (2013). Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed [Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approach. Pustaka Pelajar.

Dailami, M., Santi, D., Murtihapsari, ., Abubakar, H., & Toha, A. H. A. (2019). Genetic analisys of cytochrome oxidase sub unit 1 gene fragment from Cirrhilabrus cf. ryukyuensis (Labridae) from Cenderawasih Bay and Raja Ampat. Jurnal Iktiologi Indonesia, 18(3), 209–222.

Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Putri, W. A. (2021). Rural Student Analysis: Correlation Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking at a State Senior High School in Jambi Province. Ta'dib, 24(2), 229-250.

Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Irdianti, I. (2019). Physics education students’ science process skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(2), 293.

de la Puente Pacheco, M. A., Guerra, D., de Oro Aguado, C. M., & Alexander McGarry, C. (2019). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of Project-Based Learning (PBL) effectiveness: A case report in the Colombian Caribbean. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1616364.

Diani, R., Khotimah, H., Khasanah, U., & Syarlisjiswan, M. R. (2019). Scaffolding dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Problem Based Instruction (PBL): Efeknya Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Self Efficacy. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 310–319.

Ediansyah, E., Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., & Salamah, S. (2019). Using problem-based learning in college: Mastery concepts subject statistical research and motivation. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 446–454.

Fajriani, R. W., Naswir, M., & Harizon, H. (2021). Pemberian Scaffolding dalam Bahan Belajar Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 108-114.

Fatmawati, B. (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis proyek untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 16(2), 85-92.

Fitriani, R., Maryani, S., Chen, D., Aldila, F. T., Br.Ginting, A. A., Sehab, N. H., & Wulandari, M. (2021). Mendeskripsikan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa melalui Kegiatan Praktikum Viskositas di SMAN 1 Muaro Jambi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 173–179.

Gómez-Arízaga, M. P., Navarro, M., Martin, A., Roa-Tampe, K., Conejeros-Solar, M. L., Kronborg, L., ... & Rivera-Lino, B. (2020). Socio-Emotional Dimensions in Gifted Chilean High School Students with Interests in STEM: Influence of Gender and University Enrichment Program Participation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12).

Haerunisa, H., Prasetyaningsih, P., & Leksono, S. M. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Tema Air dan Pelestarian Lingkungan. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 299-308.

Haruehansawasin, S., & Kiattikomol, P. (2018). Scaffolding in Problem-Based Learning for Low-Achieving Learners. Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 363–370.

Hendratmoko, T., Kuswandi, D., & Setyosari, P. (2017). Tujuan pembelajaran berlandaskan konsep pendidikan jiwa merdeka Ki Hajar Dewantara [Learning objectives based on Ki Hajar Dewantara’s concept of free spirit education. Jinotep, 3(2), 152–157.

Ilmiyah, L., Purnama, S., & Mayangsari, S. N. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 5(1), 105-115.

Kamid, K., Marzal, J., Syafmen, W., Rohati, R., & Dewi, R. K. (2021a). Recall Process and Mathematics Problem Solving for Mildly Mentally Retarded Students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(3), 659–669.

Kamid, K., Rohati, R., Rahmalisa, Y., Anggo, M., Septi, S. E., Azzahra, M. Z., & Nawahdani, A. M. (2021b). Engklek Game” in mathematics: How difference and relationship student attitude towards science process skills? Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), 3109–3123.

Kamid, Rusdi, M., Fitaloka, O., Basuki, F. R., & Anwar, K. (2020). Mathematical Communication Skills Based on Cognitive Styles and Gender. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 847–856.

Khoiri, N., Riyadi, S., Kaltsum, U., Hindarto, N., & Rusilawati, A. (2017). Teaching Creative Thinking Skills with Laboratory Work. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 256.

Kurniawati, Z. L., & Jailani, J. (2020). Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Biokimia. Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(2), 59-69.

Latifah, N. N., Artharina, F. P., & Arifin, Z. (2019). Analisis Pencapaian Kompetensi Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Muatan Lokal Bahasa Jawa Materi Tembang. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(2), 276–283.

Maison, Tanti, T., Kurniawan, D. A., Sukarni, W., Erika, & Hoyi, R. (2021). Assessing students’ attitudes towards physics through the application of inquiry and jigsaw cooperative learning models in high schools. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 439–450.

Mazen, J. A., & Tong, X. (2021). Bias correction for replacement samples in longitudinal research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 56(5), 805-827.

McCarthy, J. (2018). Do Creative Thinking and Creative Problem-Solving Have a Place in Counseling Curricula? Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 13(3), 306–317.

Monárrez, A., Galvan, L., Wagler, A. E., & Lesser, L. M. (2018). Range of Meanings: A Sequential Mixed Methods Study of How English Language Learners Encounter Assessment Items on Descriptive Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 26(3), 162–173.

Naji, K. K., Ebead, U., Al-Ali, A. K., & Du, X. (2020). Comparing models of problem and project-based learning (PBL) courses and student engagement in civil engineering in Qatar. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(8).

Park, M. H., Tiwari, A., & Neumann, J. W. (2020). Emotional scaffolding in early childhood education. Educational Studies, 46(5), 570-589.

Perumcheril, R. J. (2017). Self-assessment and Review of Biochemistry, Second Edition. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers.

Putri, A. R., Maison, & Darmaji. (2018). Kerjasama dan Kekompakan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di Kelas XII MIPA SMAN 3 Kota Jambi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 32–40.

Putri, W. A., Meliza, W., & Astuti, Y. (2020). Analisis Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas X IPA Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN 6 Muaro Jambi. Journal of Science Education And Practice, 4(1), 1–10.

Putri, W. A., Simamora, N. N., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Analysis of the Relationship Between Students’ Discipline Attitude on Physics Student’s Learning Outcomes. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 390.

Rini, S. E. F., Fitriani, R., Matondang, M. M., Yolviansyah, F., Putri, N. D., Agatha, F. L., & Lolita, N. (2021). Pengaruh Karakter Kerja Keras Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Di SMA Negeri 1 Kota Jambi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 256–261.

Ruswati, I. (2018). Faktor Eksternal Dan Faktor Internal Terhadap Pendidikan Islam Darussalam Cerme Gresik. JRE: Jurnal Riset Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 38–52.

Sakir, N. A. I., & Kim, J. G. (2020). Enhancing students’ learning activity and outcomes via implementation of problem-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 19–25.

Song, D., & Kim, D. (2021). Effects of self-regulation scaffolding on online participation and learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 249–263.

Sutrismo, Kamid, & Saharudin. (2019). LKPD Bermuatan Inquiry dan Budaya Jambi: Efektivitas dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Indomath: Indonesian Mathematics Education, 2(1), 29–36.

Syahrial, Asrial, Kurniawan, D. A., & Subandiyo, M. (2019). Pedagogic Competence and Indonesian Language Competence Pre-service Teacher of Elementary Program. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 851–856.

Syahrial, Asrial, Maison, Mukminin, A., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2020). Ethnoconstructivism Analysis: Study of Pedagogic Mathematics Competence of Primary School Teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 614–624.

Syaiful, Kamid, & Huda, N. (2021). Identifying of emotional quotient junior high school students in mathematics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 202–208.

Tanti, T., Kurniawan, D. A., Sukarni, W., Erika, E., & Hoyi, R. (2021). Description of student responses toward the implementation of problem-based learning model in physics learning. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 30-38.

Ulfa, M., & Wijayanti, P. (2015). Profil Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Berkecerdasan Linguistik dan Siswa Berkecerdasan Logis-Matematis SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 14–20.

Yusuf, B. B. (2017). Konsep Dan Indikator Pembelajaran Efektif. In Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran dan Keilmuan (Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 13–20).

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.