STREM PBL with E-Authentic Assessment: Its Impact to Students’ Scientific Creativity on Static Fluid
Abstract
This study aims to explore the scientific creativity of high school students on the static fluid in STREM PBL with an e-authentic assessment. This study used a mixed method with an embedded experimental design. This study involved 30 11th-grade senior high school students in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. Data collection techniques were carried out through pretest-posttest, interview, and observation. Pretest and posttest instruments consist of three scientific creativity essay questions with a reliability of 0.610. The results of the Wilcoxon test of p = .000, with the posttest being higher than the pretest, indicate a significant difference between students’ scientific creativity before and after learning. The effect size value of 0.87 indicates that STREM PBL with an e-authentic assessment moderately affects students’ scientific creativity. All indicators of scientific creativity have increased. The order of increasing the average scientific creativity score for each indicator is fluency (high) > elaboration (moderate) > originality (moderate) > flexibility (moderate). Meanwhile, the order of the average level of scientific creativity at the posttest is fluency (very creative) > elaboration (quite creative) = flexibility (quite creative) > originality (less creative). Students’ scientific creativity increases because this learning makes students solve problems, carry out projects (design and create a product), carry out inquiry activities (experiment and investigation), collaborate with groups, and evaluate projects through self and peer assessment. Learning activities that can increase the level of fluency indicators are mentioning as many ideas as possible for experimental designs and product designs. Learning activities that can increase the level of flexibility indicators are integrating religion content into STEM (it is also better if integrating art content) and providing several problems and products from various fields. Learning activities that increase originality indicators give each individual or group a different project topic. Learning activities that can increase elaboration indicators are strengthening mastery of concepts and evaluating the work of oneself and others through self-assessment and peer assessment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akcay, B. B. (2013). Entomology: promoting creativity in the science lab. Science activities, 50(2), 49-53.
Ambiyar, A., Efendi, R., Irawati, Y., Waskito, W., & Suryadimal, S. (2019). Effectiveness e-Authentic Assessment in Computer Network Course.
Astutik, S., & Mahardika, I. K. (2020, February). HOTS student worksheet to identification of scientific creativity skill, critical thinking skill and creative thinking skill in physics learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1465, No. 1, p. 012075). IOP Publishing.
Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Through Problem-Based Learning : Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom. Internation.
Azizah, U., Parno, & Supriana, E. (2020, April). Effect of STEM-based 7E learning cycle on concepts acquisition and creative thinking on temperature and heat. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2215, No. 1, p. 050001). AIP Publishing LLC.
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in students’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750.
Blašková, M. (2014). Influencing Academic Motivation, Responsibility and Creativity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 415–425.
Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2021). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 503–529.
Cavas, B., Kesercioglu, T., Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Ozdogru, E., & Gokler, F. (2012, April). The effects of robotics club on the students’ performance on science process & scientific creativity skills and perceptions on robots, human and society. In Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum (Vol. 40, p. 50).
Cevher, A. H., Ertekin, P., & Koksal, M. S. (2014). Investigation of scientific creativity of eighth grade gifted students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 1(4), 1-8.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Dousay, T. A., & Weible, J. L. (2019). Build-A-Bug Workshop: Designing a Learning Experience with Emerging Technology to Foster Creativity. TechTrends, 63(1), 41–52.
Elizabeth Owen, V., Roy, M. H., Thai, K. P., Burnett, V., Jacobs, D., Keylor, E., & Baker, R. S. (2019). Detecting wheel-spinning and productive persistence in educational games. EDM 2019 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Edm, 378–383.
Erdogan, N., Corlu, M. S., & Capraro, R. M. (2013). Defining Innovation Literacy: Do Robotics Programs Help Students Develop Innovation Literacy Skills? International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 1–9.
Genek, S. E., & Küçük, Z. D. (2020). Investigation of scientific creativity levels of elementary school students who enrolled in a stem program1-2. Elementary Education Online, 19(3), 1715–1728.
Gibson, I. S. (2003). From solo-run to mainstream thinking: Project-based learning in engineering design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(3), 331–337.
Gülhan, F., & Şahin, F. (2016). The effects of science-technology-engineering-math (STEM) integration on 5th grade students’ perceptions and attitudes towards these areas. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 602.
Gulistan Mohammed Saido, Saedah Siraj, Abu Bakar Nordin, & Omed Saadallah Al Amedy. (2015). Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Secondary School Students in Science Learning. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 13–20.
Hake. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Dept of Physics, Indiana University.
Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The Effects of Integrated STEM Education Practices on Problem Solving Skills, Scientific Creativity, and Critical Thinking Dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358–379.
Hu, W., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X., & Adey, P. (2010). Creative scientific problem finding and its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 46–52.
Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “Learn to Think” Intervention Program. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21.
Isabekov, A., & Sadyrova, G. (2018). Project-Based Learning to Develop Creative Abilities in Students. In Vocational Teacher Education in Central Asia Developing Skills and Facilitating success (pp. 43–49).
Jindal-Snape, D., Davies, D., Collier, C., Howe, A., Digby, R., & Hay, P. (2013). The impact of creative learning environments on learners: A systematic literature review. Improving Schools, 16(1), 21–31.
Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: The use of “Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning” to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875–891.
Kencana, M. A., Musri, & Syukri, M. (2020). The effect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on students’ creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1).
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education? Science Education, 101(1), 8–31.
Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). Impact of environmental power monitoring activities on middle school student perceptions of STEM. Science Education International, 24(1), 98–123.
Kuo, H. C., Tseng, Y. C., & Yang, Y. T. C. (2019). Promoting college student’s learning motivation and creativity through a STEM interdisciplinary PBL human-computer interaction system design and development course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 1–10.
Kusairi, S., Alfad, H., & Zulaikah, S. (2017). Development of web-based intelligent tutoring (iTutor) to help students learn fluid statics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 1–11.
Kustiana, Suratno, S., & Wahyuni, D. (2020). The analysis of metacognitive skills and creative thinking skills in STEM education at senior high school for biotechnology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1).
Liu, S. C., & Lin, H. shyang. (2014). Primary Teachers’ beliefs about Scientific Creativity in the Classroom Context. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1551–1567.
Lou, S.-J., Chung, C.-C., Dzan, W.-Y., & Shih, R.-C. (2012). Construction of A Creative Instructional Design Model Using Blended, Project-Based Learning for College Students. Creative Education, 03(07), 1281–1290.
Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC 2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404.
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Diez, C. R., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 195–215.
Mayasari, T., Kadarohman, A., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2016). Exploration of student’s creativity by integrating STEM knowledge into creative products. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47.
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65.
Nuswowati, M., Susilaningsih, E., Ramlawati, & Kadarwati, S. (2017). Implementation of problem-based learning with green chemistry vision to improve creative thinking skill and students’ creative actions. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 221–228.
Park, S., Lee, S. Y., Oliver, J. S., & Cramond, B. (2006). Changes in Korean science teachers’ perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 37–64.
Perry, A., & Karpova, E. (2017). Efficacy of teaching creative thinking skills: A comparison of multiple creativity assessments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 118–126.
Pertiwi, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Rosidin, U. (2017). Efektivitas Lks Stem Untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika Universitas Lampung, 5(2), 119580.
Pinasa, S., Siripun, K., & Yuenyong, C. (2018). Developing design-based STEM education learning activities to enhance students’ creative thinking. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923.
Pinasa, S., & Srisook, L. (2019). STEM education project-Based and Robotic Learning Activities impacting on creativity and Attitude of grade 11 Students in Khon Kaen Wittayayon School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1).
Putri, N., Rusdiana, D., & Suwarma, I. R. (2020). Enhanching physics students’ creative thinking skills using CBL model implemented in STEM in vocational school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4).
Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., Hadinugrahaningsih, T., & Soeprijanto. (2019). Developing critical and creative thinking skills through STEAM integration in chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1156(1).
Raj, H., & Saxena, D. R. (2016). Scientific creativity: A review of researches. European Academic Research, 4(2), 1122–1138.
Rohim, F., & Susanto, H. (2012). Penerapan Model Discovery Terbimbing Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 1(1).
Rustaman, N. Y., Afianti, E., & Maryati, S. (2018). STEM based learning to facilitate middle school students’ conceptual change, creativity and collaboration in organization of living system topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1).
Rustaman, N. Y., Rusdiana, D., Efendi, R., & Liliawati, W. (2017). The Workshop Program on Authentic Assessment for Science Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812 012062.
Samsudin, A., Setyadin, A. H., Suhendi, E., Chandra, D. T., & Siahaan, P. (2018). Seventh Grade Students’ Scientific Creativity Test: A Preliminary-Study on Earth Science Context. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1).
Setiawan, B. B., Kurniasari, M. R., & Sarkim, T. (2020, February). The implementation of STEM approach through project based learning to develop student’s creativity. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1470, No. 1, p. 012041). IOP Publishing.
Shively, K., Stith, K. M., & Rubenstein, L. D. V. (2018). Measuring What Matters: Assessing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and the Design Process. Gifted Child Today, 41(3), 149–158.
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and evaluation of an integrated project-based and stem teaching and learning module on enhancing scientific creativity among fifth graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017–1033.
Siew, N. M., Chong, C. L., & Chin, K. O. (2014). Developing a scientific creativity test for fifth graders. Problems of Education in the 21st century, 62(1974), 109–123.
Siew, N. M., Chong, C. L., & Lee, B. N. (2015). Fostering fifth graders’ scientific creativity through problem-based learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(5), 655–669.
Sirajudin, N., Suratno, J., & Pamuti. (2021). Developing creativity through STEM education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1).
Srikoon, S., Bunterm, T., & Nethanomsak, T. (2018). Effect of 5P model on academic achievement , creative thinking , and research characteristics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 488–495.
Sulistyanto, & Rusilowati, A. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Siswa dalam Membuat Karya IPA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based-Insruction di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 5(2), 102–107.
Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-stem project-based learning: Its impact to critical and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 11–21.
Sumarni, Woro, Wijayati, N., & Supanti, S. (2019). Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berpendekatan Stem. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 4(1), 18–30.
Susilowati, E., Miriam, S., Suyidno, S., Sholahuddin, A., & Winarno, N. (2020). Integration of Learning Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in the Wetland Environment Area to Increase Students’ Creativity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1).
Syukri, M., Halim, L., & Mohtar, L. E. (2017). Engineering Design Process: Cultivating Creativity Skills through Development of Science Technical Product Muhammad. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia, 38(1), 10055–10065.
Widyasmah, M., Abdurrahman, & Herlina, K. (2020). Implementation of STEM Approach Based on Project-based Learning to Improve Creative Thinking Skills of High School Students in Physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1).
Wijayati, N., Sumarni, W., & Supanti, S. (2019). Improving Student Creative Thinking Skills Through Project Based Learning. KnE Social Sciences, 2019, 408–421.
Yang, K. K., Lin, S. F., Hong, Z. R., & Lin, H. S. (2016). Exploring the Assessment of and Relationship Between Elementary Students’ Scientific Creativity and Science Inquiry. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 16–23.
Yulianti, D., Wiyanto, Rusilowati, A., & Nugroho, S. E. (2020). Student worksheets based on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) to facilitate the development of critical and creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2).
Zainuddin, Suyidno, Dewantara, D., Mahtari, S., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Sunarti, T. (2020). The correlation of scientific knowledge-science process skills and scientific creativity in creative responsibility based learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 307–316.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
