The Influence of H5P Interactive Video on Stereoisomer Understanding in Terms of Learning Style
Abstract
The study aims to find differences in understanding of stereoisomers using h5p interactive videos based on student learning styles. The research method used was quasi-experimental, with a one-group posttest-only design. This study’s subjects were all second-year biology teacher education students at IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. The data were analyzed using descriptive and two-way ANOVA tests to determine differences in understanding. Future research is suggested to include more interactive video features in learning scenarios and measure other cognitive topics. The study found differences in stereoisomer understanding based on interactive videos and learning styles. There is no relationship between interactive video interaction and learning style and stereoisomer understanding simultaneously. This study is limited to the use of H5P interactive video. Subsequent work can increase the intensity and optimize the use of all H5P interaction features.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afify, M. K. (2020). Effect of Interactive Video Length within E-Learning Environments on Cognitive Load, Cognitive Achievement and Retention Of Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 68–89.
Ahmad, N. J., Yakob, N., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Winarno, N., & Akmal, W. H. (2021). The Effect of Interactive Computer Animation and Simulation on Students’ Achievement and Motivation in Learning Electrochemistry. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 311–324.
Ahmet, A., Gamze, K., Rustem, M., & Sezen, K. A. (2018). Is Video-Based Education an Effective Method in Surgical Education? A Systematic Review. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(5), 1150–1158.
Albertson, D., & Ju, B. (2016). Perceived self-efficacy and interactive video retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 72(5), 832–857.
Alpert, F., & Hodkinson, C. S. (2019). Video use in lecture classes: Current practices, student perceptions and preferences. Education + Training, 61(1), 31–45.
Anderson, A. J., Kiela, D., Clark, S., & Poesio, M. (2017). Visually Grounded and Textual Semantic Models Differentially Decode Brain Activity Associated with Concrete and Abstract Nouns. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5, 17–30.
Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 808–821.
Biard, N., Cojean, S., & Jamet, E. (2018). Effects of segmentation and pacing on procedural learning by video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 411–417.
Botelho, M. G., Gao, X., & Jagannathan, N. (2019). A qualitative analysis of students’ perceptions of videos to support learning in a psychomotor skills course. European Journal of Dental Education, 23(1), 20–27.
Chilukuri, K. C. (2020). A Novel Framework for Active Learning in Engineering Education Mapped to Course Outcomes. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 28–33.
Choe, R. C., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R., Toma, S. P., Shapiro, C., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barnes, G., & Crosbie, R. H. (2019). Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Asynchronous Online Lecture Videos. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar55.
Chouhan, R. (2022). Enhanced engagement through instructor-created interactive video assignments in a flipped electrical engineering classroom. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1095–1103.
Clark, R. E., & Feldon, D. F. (2014). Ten Common but Questionable Principles of Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2nd ed., pp. 151–173). Cambridge University Press.
Dietz-Uhler, B., Fisher, A., & Han, A. (2007). Designing Online Courses to Promote Student Retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(1), 105–112.
Dinc, E., & Millet, A. L. (2022). Evaluating Different Assessment Types in an Online Geoscience Course. Proceeedings of the 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022). 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA 2022).
Fan, J., & Wang, Z. (2020). The impact of gamified interaction on mobile learning APP users’ learning performance: the moderating effect of users’ learning style. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-14.
Fang, L., Zhao, J., Pan, Z., & Li, Y. (2023). TPP: Deep learning based threshold post-processing multi-focus image fusion method. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 110, 108736.
Fujita, N. (2020). Transforming online teaching and learning: Towards learning design informed by information science and learning sciences. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 503–511.
Gil‐García, I. C., Fernández‐Guillamón, A., García‐Cascales, M. S., & Molina‐García, Á. (2023). Virtual campus environments: A comparison between interactive H5P and traditional online activities in master teaching. Computer Applications in Engineering Education.
Hassan, M. A., Habiba, U., Majeed, F., & Shoaib, M. (2021). Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 545–565.
Hung, I.-C., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.-S. (2018). Embodied interactive video lectures for improving learning comprehension and retention. Computers & Education, 117, 116–131.
Kamran Mir, Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, & Jahan Ara Shams. (2022). Investigation of Students’ Satisfaction about H5P Interactive Video on MOODLE for Online Learning. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 71–82.
Kleftodimos, A., & Evangelidis, G. (2016). Using open source technologies and open internet resources for building an interactive video based learning environment that supports learning analytics. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 9.
Knoll, A. R., Otani, H., Skeel, R. L., & Van Horn, K. R. (2017). Learning style, judgements of learning, and learning of verbal and visual information. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 544–563.
Ku, W.-P., Yang, K.-H., & Chang, W.-L. (2019). The Design and Evaluation of Interactive Video-Based Flipped Classroom on Mathematics Learning. 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 1041–1042.
Kuhail, A. A., & Aqel, M. S. (2020). Interactive Digital Videos and Their Impact on Sixth Graders’ English Reading and Vocabulary Skills and Retention: International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 16(3), 42–56.
Leeds, E., Campbell, S., Baker, H., Ali, R., Brawley, D., & Crisp, J. (2013). The impact of student retention strategies: An empirical study. International Journal of Management in Education, 7(1/2), 22.
Liu, Z., Yin, H., Cui, W., Xu, B., & Zhang, M. (2022). How to reflect more effectively in online video learning: Balancing processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(1), 114–129.
Llerena-Izquierdo, J., & Zamora-Galindo, J. (2021). Using H5P Services to Enhance the Student Evaluation Process in Programming Courses at the Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (Guayaquil, Ecuador). In M. Botto-Tobar, H. Cruz, & A. Díaz Cadena (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence, Computer and Software Engineering Advances (Vol. 1326, pp. 216–227). Springer International Publishing.
Moser, S., & Zumbach, J. (2018). Exploring the development and impact of learning styles: An empirical investigation based on explicit and implicit measures. Computers & Education, 125, 146–157.
Mou, Y., Jing, B., Li, Y., Fang, N., & Wu, C. (2022). Interactivity in learning instructional videos: Sending danmaku improved parasocial interaction but reduced learning performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1066164.
Mutawa, A. M., Al Muttawa, J. A. K., & Sruthi, S. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using H5P for Undergraduate Students in the Asynchronous Distance Learning Environment. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 4983.
Ovalle, F., Schofield, D., & O’Hara-Leslie, E. (2017). Assessing Interactive Video Systems Used as a Training Tool for Medical Assistants. International Journal of Information Technology (IJIT), 3(5), 1–9.
Palaigeorgiou, G., Papadopoulou, A., & Kazanidis, I. (2019). Interactive Video for Learning: A Review of Interaction Types, Commercial Platforms, and Design Guidelines. In M. Tsitouridou, J. A. Diniz, & T. A. Mikropoulos (Eds.), Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education (Vol. 993, pp. 503–518). Springer International Publishing.
Pang, H., Zhang, C., Wang, F., Liu, J., & Sun, L. (2019). Towards Low Latency Multi-viewpoint 360° Interactive Video: A Multimodal Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 991–999.
Ploetzner, R. (2022). The effectiveness of enhanced interaction features in educational videos: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16.
Priyakanth, R., Abburi, R., & Praveena, M. (2021). Design and Impact of Interactive Video Content for the Improvement of Student Engagement and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(0), 518.
Rama Devi, S., Subetha, T., Aruna Rao, S. L., & Morampudi, M. K. (2022). Enhanced Learning Outcomes by Interactive Video Content—H5P in Moodle LMS. In V. Suma, Z. Baig, S. Kolandapalayam Shanmugam, & P. Lorenz (Eds.), Inventive Systems and Control (Vol. 436, pp. 189–203). Springer Nature Singapore.
Riccomini, P. J., Witzel, B. S., & Deshpande, D. S. (2022). Combining Visual Representations and a Powerful Retention Strategy With Peer-Mediated Strategies to Improve Mathematical Outcomes for Students With EBD. Beyond Behavior, 31(1), 42–52.
Scagnoli, N. I., Choo, J., & Tian, J. (2019). Students’ insights on the use of video lectures in online classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 399–414.
Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165, 104132.
Singleton, R., & Charlton, A. (2019). Creating H5P content for active learning. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 13–14.
Sinnayah, P., Salcedo, A., & Rekhari, S. (2021). Reimagining physiology education with interactive content developed in H5P. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 71–76.
Smithwick, E., Baxter, E., Kim, K., Edel-Malizia, S., Rocco, S., & Blackstock, D. (2018). Interactive Videos Enhance Learning about Socio-Ecological Systems. Journal of Geography, 117(1), 40–49.
Sonia, W., Ghaith, Z., Tania, M., & Rosemary, B. (2018). Considerations for designing H5P online interactive activities. Open Oceans: Learning without Borders. Proceedings ASCILITE, 543–549.
Švarcová, E., & Jelínková, K. (2016). Detection of Learning Styles in the Focus Group. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 177–182.
Trilaksono, K., & Santoso, H. B. (2017). Moodle Based Learning Management System Development for Kinesthetic Learning Style. 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), 602–606.
Unsworth, A. J., & Posner, M. G. (2022). Case Study: Using H5P to design and deliver interactive laboratory practicals. Essays in Biochemistry, 66(1), 19–27.
Wicaksono, J. A., Setiarini, R. B., Ikeda, O., & Novawan, A. (2021). The Use of H5P in Teaching English: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2020). The First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2020), Jember, Indonesia.
Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F.-H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic – online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175–187.
Yulianci, S., Nurjumiati, N., Asriyadin, A., & Adiansha, A. A. (2021). The Effect of Interactive Multimedia and Learning Styles on Students’ Physics Creative Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 87–91.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
