Pandemi Covid-19 As A Factor of Delays in The Execution of Court Decisions
(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Abstract
Judicial decisions that have permanent legal force contain definite and permanent legal rights and positions between the litigating parties that must be realized through execution. Execution is a forced effort by the court against the defendants who don’t want to implement the judicial decisions voluntarily.The aim of this research is to know the factors that caused the delay in the implementation of the real execution in civil case No. 10/Pdt.G/2018/PN PWK Jo 93/Pdt/2019/PT BDG Jo 3532 K/Pdt/2019 at Purwakarta District Court. This research uses empirical legal research methods with a qualitative approach. To be able to obtain the necessary data, the authors use several methods, namely interviews and document analysis. The results of this research show that third-party resistance and the COVID-19 pandemic are factors causing the delay in the real execution of civil case no. 10/Pdt.G/2018/PN PWK Jo 93/Pdt/2019/PT BDG Jo 3532 K/Pdt/2019. In principle, even if there is resistance, the execution is not absolutely delayed unless the reason for the resistance is rational; in that case, the execution is delayed at least until the resistance is decided by the District Court. Meanwhile, health reasons and the government’s policy not to carry out activities that create crowds (Physical Distancing) are the basis for considering the COVID-19 pandemic as the cause of the delay in the real execution. Execution is the authority of the Head of the District Court in the form of policy. Thus, executions in civil cases have been delayed because of third-party resistance, and the COVID-19 pandemic is the policy of the Head of the District Court, which has been given by law. Execution is the authority of the Head of the District Court in the form of policy. Thus, executions in civil cases have been delayed because of third-party resistance, and the COVID-19 pandemic is the policy of the Head of the District Court, which has been given by law. Execution is the authority of the Head of the District Court in the form of policy. Thus, executions in civil cases have been delayed because of third-party resistance, and the COVID-19 pandemic is the policy of the Head of the District Court, which has been given by law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aristeus, Syprianus. “Eksekusi Ideal Perkara Perdata Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan Korelasinya Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan (Ideal Execution of Civil Law Based on Principles The Justice of Correlation in Efforts to Reach Simple, Fast Justice and Light Fee)”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, No.3 (September 2020) : 379-390.
Fattah,Damanhuri. “Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawls”. Jurnal TAPIs 9, No.2 (Juli-Desember 2013):30-45.
Gintis, Herbert, et.al. “Zoon Politicon: The Evolutionary of Human Political Systems”. Current Anthropology 56 , No.3 (Juni 2015):327-353.
Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata:Tentang Gugatan, Pembuktian Persidangan, Penyitaan. Jakarta:Sinar Grafika,2017.
Harahap, Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata Edisi Kedua Cetakan ke-7 . Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Hamedi,Afifeh. “The Concept of Justice In Greek Philosophy (Plato and Aristotle)”. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5, No. 27 (Desember 2014):1163-1167.
Herri Swantoro. Dilema Eksekusi Ketika Eksekusi Perdata Ada di Simpang Jalan Pembelajaran dari Pengadilan Negeri. Jakarta : RAYYANA Komunikasiindo, 2018.
Latifiani, Dian. “Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim”, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata (ADHAPER) 1, No.1 (Januari-Juni 2015): 15-29.
Latifiani, Dian & Ratnasari, Mitha, The Small Claim Court To Realize The Fast And Simple Principle In Civil Disputes Resolution, South East Asia journal Of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law. Vol 18 , 2019
Latifiani, Dian et al, Reconstruction Of E-Court Legal Culture In Civil Law Enforcement , Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) , Vol 7 No, 2 P. 415
Pradnyawati & I Nengah Laba. “Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga (Derden Verzet) Terhadap Putusan Verstek”. Jurnal Lingkungan & Pembangunan Vol. 2, No. 1 (Maret 2018): 44-48.
Pratasis, Suprima Ollifica. “Implementasi Teori Keadilan Komutatif Terhadap Pelaku Pemerkosaan Menurut Pasal 285 KUHP”. Lex et Societatis II, No.5 (Juni 2014): 51-61.
Rahman Syamsuddin. “Keadilan Bermartabat Pada Upaya Hukum Luar Biasa Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia”. Disertasi Program Doktor, Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar, 2018.
Riesbeck, David J. “Aristotle and the Scope of Justice”. Journal of Ancient Philosophy 15, No.2 (2016):59-91.
Suadi, Amran. Sistem Pengawasan Badan Peradilan di Indonesia. Depok:Rajawali Pers, 2014.
Sutantio, Retnowulan & Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktik. CV Mandar Maju:Bandung, 2019.
Wikanto, Adityo Wahyu, et.al. “Eksekusi Riil Dalam Perkara Perdata Tentang Pengosongan Tanah dan Bangunan Rumah”. Jurnal Verstek 2, No.2 (2014):1-10.
Wu, Di, Tiantian Wu, Qun Liu & Zhicong Yang. “The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: What we Know”. International Jounal of Infectious Diseases, No. 94 (Maret 2020):44-48.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.