Development of Cognitive Ability Test Instrument Based on Revision Bloom Taxonomy on Dynamic Electricity Materials For Students of Senior High School
(1) MAN 1 Semarang Magister Fisika Pascasarjana UNNES
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang
Abstract
This study aims to develop a cognitive ability test instrument based on Bloom's taxonomy revision. The test instrument covers the cognitive domains C1 (remembering), C2 (understanding), C3 (applying), C4 (analyzing), C5 (evaluating), and C6 (creating). The research was carried out using research and development methods using a 4-D development model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The research data obtained is analyzed quantitatively to determine the validity, discriminatory power, reliability, and level of difficulty of the cognitive ability test instrument. Results of research based on the analysis of the validity test showed that the test instrument was declared valid by material experts and evaluation experts with an average value of 92.65. Based on the analysis of the validity of the item validity test, there are two invalid questions, namely questions number 2 and 10. Based on the results of analyzing differentiating power, the results of question number 20 are obtained, 64 for essay questions. Based on the analysis of the level of difficulty, the results showed that the test instrument was at 5% percent of the questions at the difficulty level, 20% at the sufficient level, 70% at the medium level, and 5% at the easy level. Overall, the test instrument is valid, reliable, has good discriminating power, and has varying levels of difficulty.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afni, N., & Kazmi, T. (n.d.). The Need Analysis Developing STEM Embeded Project.
Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran (1st ed.). De Publisher.
Asrul, Rusydi Ananda, & Rosnita. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (1st ed.). Pustaka Media.
Cahyono, T. (2017). Statistik Uji korelasi (1st ed.). Yasamas.
Dewi, S. M., Gunawan, G., Susilawati, S., & Harjono, A. (2019). Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Model Generatif Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 162–166. https://DOI.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i1.1175
Fitria Alika, M., Darsono, T., Linuwih Jurusan Fisika, S., & Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, F. (2018). Pengembangan Soal Model Pisa untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP pada Materi Pemanasan Global. UPEJ, 7(3). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej
Handayani, S. L., & Iba, K. (2020). Karakteristik Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains: Validitas, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Soal. Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan, 10, 100–106. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/index.php/
Hidayatulloh, M., Wiryokusumo, I., & Walujo, D. A. (2019). Remidiasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Listrik Dinamis Menggunakan Ebook Interaktif. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 30–39. https://DOI.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i1.986
Ilmi, N., Desnita, D., Handoko, E., & Zelda, B. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. E-Jurnal, 57–62. https://DOI.org/10.21009/0305010213
Kurniawan, B. R., Reyza, M., & Taqwa, A. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika pada Materi Listrik Dinamis Computer-Based Assessment to Support the Basic Skills of Teaching Course View project. Jurnal Pendidikan. https://DOI.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i11.11761
Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyani, R. (2018). Identifikasi Kuantitas Siswa Yang Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Listik Dinamis Menggunakan Three Tier-Test (TTT). In Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika (Vol. 3).
Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., & Isnaeni, W. (2020). NGSS-oriented chemistry test instruments: Validity and reliability analysis with the Rasch model. Research and Evaluation in Education, 6(1). https://DOI.org/10.21831/reid.v6i1.30112
Mar’atus S, F., Maharta, N., & Suana, W. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Materi Hukum Newton Tentang Gerak (Development Of Higher Thinking Instrument Of Newton ’S Laws Of Motion). Jurnal of Physics and Science Learning, 2(1), 17–26.
Mukarromah, A., & Andriana, M. (2022). Peranan Guru dalam Mengembangkan Media Pembelajaran. JSER Journal of Science and Education Research, 1(1). https://jurnal.insanmulia.or.id/index.php/jser/
Nabilah, Stepanus, S. S., & Hamdani. (n.d.). Analisis Kemampuan Kognitif Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Momentum Dan Impuls. In JIPPF (Vol. 1).
Najib, K., Siswanto, J., & Saefan, J. (2020). Pengaruh Pendekatan Multirepresentasi Terhadap Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. In Journal of Banua Science Education E (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Nofitasari, I., & Sihombing, D. Y. (2017). Deskripsi Kesulitan Belajar Peserta Didik Dan Faktor Penyebabnya Dalam Memahami Materi Listrik Dinamis Kelas X Sma Negeri 2 Bengkayang Description Of Students’ Learning Difficulties And The Causes On Understanding Dynamics Electricity In X Grade SMA Negeri 2 Bengkayang. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 07(01). http://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpfa
Pakpahan, S. H. (2021). TIPS membuat soal HOTS IPA SMP dan FISIKA SMA. Guepedia Grup.
Permendikbud No 37 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Kurikulum 2013.
Pratama, R. E., & Mulyati, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring dan Luring pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 49. https://DOI.org/10.30870/gpi.v1i2.9405
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2018). An assessment-based model for exploring the solving of mathematical problems: Utilizing revised bloom’s taxonomy and facets of metacognition. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 41–51. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.004
Roldán-Merino, J., Farrés-Tarafa, M., Estrada-Masllorens, J. M., Hurtado-Pardos, B., Miguel-Ruiz, D., Nebot-Bergua, C., Insa-Calderon, E., Grané-Mascarell, N., Bande-Julian, D., Falcó-Pergueroles, A. M., Lluch-Canut, M. T., & Casas, I. (2019). Reliability and validity study of the Spanish adaptation of the “Creighton Simulation Evaluation Instrument (C-SEI).” Nurse Education in Practice, 35, 14–20. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.12.007
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
Rusilowati, A., & Astuti, B. (2019). Pengembangan Tes Literasi Sains (1st ed., Vol. 1). LPPM Unnes.
Safitri, D. (2019). Menjadi guru profesional (S. Anwar, Ed.). PT Indragiri Dot Com.
Sagala, P. N., & Andriani, A. (2019). Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions of Probability Theory Subject Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://DOI.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025
Sailer, M., Stadler, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., Franke, U., Schöffmann, C., Paniotova, V., Husagic, L., & Fischer, F. (2021). Technology-related teaching skills and attitudes: Validation of a scenario-based self-assessment instrument for teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106625
Shakhman, L., & Barak, M. (2019). The physics problem-solving taxonomy (PPST): Development and application for evaluating student learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(11). https://DOI.org/10.29333/ejmste/109266
Suharsimi, & Arikunto. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian (pp. 86–87). Rineka Cipta.
Suprapto, E., Saryanto, S., Sumiharsono, R., & Ramadhan, S. (2020). The Analysis of Instrument Quality to Measure the Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skill in Physics Learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 520–527. https://DOI.org/10.36681/tused.2020.42
Susiaty, U. D., & Oktaviana, D. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Instrumen Tes Berdasarkan Revisi Taksonomi Bloom Untuk Mengukur Higher Order Thinking Skills Siswa.
Tanjung, Y., Bakar, A., Instrumen, P., Fisika, T., Dimensi, B., Konseptual, P., Bloom, T., Jurnal, R., Fisika, P., Tanjung, Y. I., & Bakar, A. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Fisika Berbasis Dimensi Pengetahuan Konseptual Dari Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2). http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Indiana University.
Triwiyanto, T. (2021). Pengantar Pendidikan (1st ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Tyowati, S. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Fisika Kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas. In Jurnal Pendidikan (Vol. 16, Issue 1).
Usop, T. B., Sudaryono, S., & Roychansyah, M. S. (2022). Disempowering Traditional Spatial Arrangement of Dayak Community: A Case Study of Tumbang Marikoi Village, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 121–141. https://DOI.org/10.24259/fs.v6i1.13472
Waite, L. H., Zupec, J. F., Quinn, D. H., & Poon, C. Y. (2020). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy as a mentoring framework for successful promotion. In Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (Vol. 12, Issue 11, pp. 1379–1382). Elsevier Inc. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.06.009
Waizah, N., & Herwani, H. (2021). Penilaian Pengetahuan Tertulis Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 207–228. https://DOI.org/10.31538/tijie.v2i2.54
Winarni, E. W. (2018). Teori dan Praktik Peneltian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R&D (1st ed., Vol. 1). Bumi Aksara.
Yusuf, I., & Asrifan, A. (n.d.). PENINGKATAN Aktivitas Kolaborasi Pembelajaran Fisika Melalui Pendekatan Stem Dengan Purwarupa Pada Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 5 Yogyakarta (Improving Collaboration of Physics Learning Activities through the STEM Approach). In Uniqbu Journal of Exact Sciences (UJES) (Vol. 1, Issue 3).
Yusup Program Studi Tadris Biologi, F., & Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, F. (2018). UJI Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Januari-Juni, 7(1), 17–23.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License