Development of Online Mechanics Concept Inventory (OMCI) Instrument Based on Local Wisdom

Arik Pujiyanti(1), Budi Naini Mindyarto(2), Budi Astuti(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v7i1.39143


(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

This study discusses the development of online mechanics concept inventory (OMCI) instrument based on local wisdom. The purpose of this study to determine the quality of the online mechanics concept inventory instrument based on local wisdom. The type of this research is Research and Development (R&D). The developed instrument is integrated with local wisdom, so that every item has literacy as a stimulus for the question. The concept inventory instrument is one of the test tools presented online which is used to measure students' conceptual understanding. The research model used is Borg and Gall. The instrument developed were validated by expert judgment. The results of the validation assessment are in the form of qualitative and quantitative content validity. The results of qualitative validity can be seen in terms of materials obtained on an average of 99.2%, construction is averaged 93.3%, and language is averaged 97.4%. While the quantitative analysis of validity is done using Aiken's v equations obtained an average of 0.841 of valored 0.841 is so high, it is worth being used to measure understanding the conception of learners.

Keywords

concept inventory, instrument, local wisdom

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Alfika, Z. A., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Berbasis Kearifan Lokal pada siswa SMP / MTs. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika IV, 1–11.

Cevik, E. E., & Kurnaz, M. A. (2019). Analysis of the Responses of Science Teacher Candidates to Force Concept Inventory by Concentration Factor. 7(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070115

Fadilah, N. (2019). Design and Content Validity Analysis of Physics Test based on Local Wisdom for High School Students. 602–609.

Handhika, J., Huriawati, F., & Fitriani, N. (2017). Force concept inventory ( FCI ) representation of high school students ( SMA & MA ). (May). https://doi.org/10.20961/jphystheor-appl.v1i1.4706,

Hartini, S., Firdausi, S., & Sulaeman, N. F. (2018). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 7(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14249.

Hendryadi, H. (2017). Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v2i2.47.

Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory A response to Huffman and Heller. (November). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344278.

Husin, V. E. R., & Billik, A. H. (2019). Identifikasi Konsep Fisika Pada Kearifan Lokal Anyaman Di Kabupaten Timor Tengah Selatan. Jurnal Fisika : Fisika Sains Dan Aplikasinya, 4(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.35508/fisa.v4i2.1828.

Kanhadilok, P., & Watts, D. M. (2013). Western Science and Local Thai Wisdom: Using Museum Toys to Develop Bi-Gnosis. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.758330.

Khotimah, H., & Mindyarto, B. N. (2021). Pengembangan Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) Pada Materi Getaran, Gelombang, dan Bunyi. UPEJ, 10(1), 88–100.

Lismina. (2018). Pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi. Ponorogo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.

OECD. (n.d.). PISA 2018 Results What Students Know And Can Do Volume I. Retrieved January 27, 2020, from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en

Pendidik, P., Society, M., Studi, P., Fisika, P., Madiun, U. P., Permainan, A., … Otok, O. (2019). Makalah Pendamping ISSN : 2527-6670. 1–7.

Riduwan, & Sunarto. (2011). Pengantar Statistika Untuk Penelitian Pendidikan, Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi, dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta, Cet Ke-4.

Suardi, M. (2018). Belajar & Pembelajaran. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=kQ1SDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Belajar+dan+Pembelajaran&hl=id&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi8qpjWyojrAhXDILcAHUF8DOAQ6AEwAHoECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=Belajar dan Pembelajaran&f=false.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung.

Sukma fitriani, A., & Munjariyati, F. S. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Penilaianketerampilan Puisi Kelas Vii Tahun Pelajaran. Jurnal Sastra, 10(2), 111-122.

Suryani & Hendryadi. (2015). Metode Riset Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Bidang Manajemen dan Ekonomi Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Syarif, A. N., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Developing an Essay Test Instrument for Measuring Diagram Representation and the Capability of Argumentation on Newton’s Law. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012030

Tohir, M. (2015). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8Q9VY.

Wells, M., Hestenes, D., & Swackhamer, G. (1995). A modeling method for high school physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 63(7), 606–619. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17849

Widyoko, E. P. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


View My Stats