Controversial Issues on the Making of Notarial Deed Containing Chained Promise (Beding Berantai) on the Freedom of Contract Principle
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In carrying out the duties as a civil law notary, it is possible that they find himself/herself composing a deed containing chained promise (beding berantai). Departing from this background, it can be drawn that the formulation of the problem, among others, how is the position of chained promise (beding) in Indonesian civil law order and how is the role of civil law notary balancing legal protection for the parties in making deed containing chained promise (beding). Another controversial issue is the chained beding faced with the freedom of contract principle. The purpose of this research is to understand the position of chained promise (beding) in Indonesian civil law order and the role of civil law notary balancing legal protection for the parties in making deed containing chained promise (beding). To answer the questions, a juridical normative approach is conducted. To obtain legal materials needed, it is then carried out by searching, collecting and reviewing library materials, legislation, research results, scientific works and other written documents. Data obtained from the result of study will then be analyzed qualitatively. From the results of study, it is known that chained promise (beding berantai) is an instrument or a way to transfer rights/obligations arising from an agreement to the party that obtains rights based on a special title. Recommendations given to the stakeholders are, namely civil law notary themselves in carrying out their duties and positions so that he/she could pay more attention to the points represented in his/her product of authentic (notarial) deed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
References
Arifin, Ridwan. “Democracy on Indonesian Legal Reform: How Can People Participate on Laws and Regulations Establishment Processâ€, JILS (Jurnal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 2017, 2 (02): 155-158. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v2i02.19439.
Budiono, Herlien. Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian dan Penerapannya di Bidang Kenotariatan. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Dilaga, Auria Patria. “Politics of Law on Protection to Folklore in a Regional Autonomy Perspective: Rights for Indigenous Peopleâ€, JILS (Jurnal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 2017, 2 (01): 25-36. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v2i01.16634.
Edwar, Faisal A. Rani dan Dahlan Ali. “Kedudukan Notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum ditinjau dari Konsep Equality before the Lawâ€, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2019, 49 (01): 180-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no1.1916.
Evalina, Yessica. “Karakteristik dan Kaitan antara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasiâ€, Jurnal Repertorium, 2014, 1 (2): 48-56.
Gilalo, J. Jopie. “Asas Keseimbangan dalam Perjanjian Franchise Menurut Ketentuan Pasal 1338 KUHPerdataâ€, Jurnal Hukum De’Rechhtsstaat, 2015, 1 (2): 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v1i2.398.
Hastuti, Luthfiyah Trini. Studi Tentang Wacana Hukum Responsif dalam Politik Hukum Nasional di Era Reformasi. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 2008.
Hendra, Rahmad. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Otentik yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu di Kota Pekanbaruâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2014, 3 (1): 6-11.
Idham. Paradigma Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-undang Guna Meneguhkan Prinsip Kedaulatan Rakyat dan Indonesia sebagai Negara Hukum. Bandung: PT Alumni Bandung, 2010.
Koesnoe, Mohammad. “Ajaran Mahkamah Agung tentang Bagaimana Seharusnya Menafsirkan Kitab Undang-undang dari Masa Kolonialâ€, Varia Pengadilan Tahun XI Nomor 126, 1996.
Lantanea, Yudo Diharjo. “Dukungan Notaris dalam Perekonomian dan Perdagangan di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA)†Proceedings of Indonesian Legal Preparedness in Dealing with the ASEAN Economic Community (Prosiding Kesiapan Hukum Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN (MEA)), 2nd of April, 2016: 54-69, retrieved from https://ejournal.medan.uph.edu/index.php/Prosiding/article/download/255/123
Latumeten, Pieter E. “Reposisi Pemberian Kuasa dalam Konsep “Volmacht dan Lastgeving†berdasarkan Cita Hukum Pancasilaâ€, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2017, 47 (1.133): 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol47.no1.133.
Lestari, Tri Wahyu Surya dan Lukman Santoso. “Komparasi Syarat Keabsahan “Sebab yang Halal†dalam Perjanjian Konvensional dan Perjanjian Syariahâ€, Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2017, 2 (1): 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v8i2.3240.
Mouzas, Stefanos dan Michael Furmston. “From Contract to Umbrella Agreementâ€, Cambridge Law Journal, 2008, 67 (1): 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197308000081.
Ningsih, Ayu dan Faisal. “Kedudukan Notaris sebagai Mediator Sengketa Kenotariatan Terkait dengan Kewajiban Penyuluhan Hukum (Legal Position of Notary as a Mediator in Notary-related Dispute in Connection with the Legal Counseling Obligation)â€, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 2019, 13 (2): 201-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.V13.201-228.
Pangaribuan, Togi. “Permasalahan Penerapan Klausula Pembatasan Pertanggungjawaban dalam Perjanjian terkait Hak menuntut Ganti Kerugian akibat Wanprestasiâ€, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2019, 49 (2): 443-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2012.
Prasetyo, Hananto. “Pembaharuan Hukum Perjanjian Sportentertainment Berbasis Nilai Keadilan (Studi Kasus pada Petinju Profesional di Indonesia)â€, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2017, IV (1): 65-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i1.1645.
Prastomo, Dimas Agung dan Akhmad Khisni. “Akibat Hukum Akta di Bawah Tangan yang Dilegalisasi oleh Notarisâ€, Jurnal Akta, 2017, 4 (4): 727-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.4.4.727%20-%20738.
Priyono, Ery Agus. “Aspek Keadilan dalam Kontrak Bisnis di Indonesia (Kajian pada Perjanjian Waralaba)â€, Jurnal Law Reform, 2018, 14 (1): 15-28. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i1.20233.
Saprai, Prince. “The Penalties Rule and the Promise Theory of Contractâ€, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 2013, 26 (2): 443-469. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900006147.
Sari, Novi Ratna. “Komparisi Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian Menurut Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islamâ€, Jurnal Repertorium, 2017, 4 (2): 78-89. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/repertorium/article/view/18284.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. “Penafsiran Kontrak Menurut Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata dan Maknanya Bagi Para Pihak yang Bersangkutanâ€, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 2013, 20 (2): 207-233. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss2.art3.
Tan, David. Transformasi Hukum di Bidang Kontrak Perdagangan Internasional ke dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, 2018.
Wibisana, Andri Gunawan. “Menulis di Jurnal Hukum: Gagasan, Struktur dan Gayaâ€, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 2019, 49 (2): 471-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2014.
Laws and Regulations
The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesian Code of Civil Law, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Indonesia.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 regarding Notary Position, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 regarding Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 regarding Notary Position, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.