Dynamics of Legality Principles in Indonesian National Criminal Law Reform

Main Article Content

Beni Puspito
Ali Masyhar
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2317-7517

Abstract

This study aims to find out the dynamics of the legality principle in the renewal of criminal law laws in Indonesia. The type of research used is doctrinal research. All data obtained were analyzed qualitatively juridically. This study examines and examines secondary data about the dynamics of the legality principle in reforming criminal law laws in Indonesia. The principle of legality according to Paul Johan Anslem von Feuerbach is nulla poena sine lege; nulla poena sine crimine; nullum crimen sine poena legali. These three phrases then become the adage Nullum delictum, nulla poena sine praevia legi poenali, which means that no act can be punished except for the strength of the criminal rules in the legislation that existed before the act was committed. The results of this studystates that if an act does not meet the formulation of an offense in a written law, the judge can impose a sentence if the act is considered disgraceful, contrary to justice and other social norms in people's lives. So that implicitly the criminal law in Indonesia has recognized the teaching of material lawlessness in a positive function.

Article Details

How to Cite
Puspito, B., & Masyhar, A. (2023). Dynamics of Legality Principles in Indonesian National Criminal Law Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i1.64078
Section
Research Article
Author Biographies

Beni Puspito, Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Semarang (Penitentiary Institution of Class I of Semarang)

Beni Puspito was born in Pati on February 12, 1991. Completed his undergraduate education at the Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, and is currently completing his master's degree in law, concentration in law and the criminal justice system at Semarang State University. Since 2017 he has worked as the Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan Pertama at the Bapas Kelas I Semarang.

Ali Masyhar, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Ali Masyhar is an Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. He obtained the bachelor's dan master's degree of law from Universitas Diponegoro, and doctoral's degree from Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

References

Anjari, Warih. “Kedudukan Asas Legalitas Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 003/PUU-IV/2006 Dan 025/PUU-XIV/2016.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 1 (2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1611.

Barda Nawawi Arief. “Beberapa Aspek Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Pidana (Menyongsong Generasi Baru Hukum Pidana Indonesia).” 2011.

Bassiouni, M. Cherif. Introduction to International Criminal Law: Second Revised Edition. International Criminal Law Series. Vol. 1, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004231696.

Boot, Machteld. Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of The International Criminal Court: Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes. Antwerpen – Oxford – New York: Intersentia, 2001.

Cassese, Antonio. International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, 2003.

E. Utrecht. Hukum Pidana I. Bandung: Penerbitan Universitas, 1960.

Eddy O.S Hiariej. “Pemikiran Remmelink Mengenai Asas Legalitas.” Jentera Jurnal Hukum IV, no. 16 (2007).

Fletcher, George P. Basic Concept of Criminal Law. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma, 2019.

Indonesia, Departemen hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik. Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (2013).

Irawatu, Arista Candra. “Politik Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Ruu Kuhp Asas Legalitas) Arista.” Adil Indonesia Jurnal 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–12.

Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. Politik Hukum, 2018.

Jonkers, J.E. Handboek Van Het Nederlansch – Indische Strafrecht. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1946.

MD, Mahfud. “Beberapa Catatan Tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomer 003/PUU-IV/2006 Tentang Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Secara Materiil".” Eksaminasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dengan Perkara Nomor 003/PUU-IV/2006 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomer 31 Tahun 1999 Sebagaimana Yang Telah Diubah Dengan Undang-Udang Nomer 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 2006.

Poernomo, Bambang. “Manfaat Telaah Ilmu Hukum Pidana Dalam Membangun Model Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada. 1989.

Remmelink, Jan. Hukum Pidana: Komentar Atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda Dan Pandanannya Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.

Sapardjaja, Komariah. Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materiel Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia : Studi Kasus Tentang Penerapan Dan Perkembangannya Dalam Yurisprudensi, 2002.

Strafgesetzbuch (n.d.).

Sudibyo, Ateng, and Aji Halim Rahman. “Dekonstruksi Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana.” Journal Presumption of Law 3, no. 1 (2021): 55–79. https://doi.org/10.31949/jpl.v3i1.985.

Yani, Fitri, Bambang Indra Gunawan, Boby Daniel Simatupang, and Azan Nurohim. “Penerapan Asas Legalitas Dalam Praktek Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Menghadapi Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Lex Justitia 4, no. 2 (2022): 118–34.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>