Efforts to Unravel the Complexity of Election and Election Crimes in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Problems in electoral law are more complex than those in other legal regimes. The many types of problems and the large number of institutions involved in handling elections and general elections indicate the complexity of electoral law and election problems. There are six types of problems in election and general election law, namely violations of the code of ethics for election and general election organizers, electoral and electoral disputes, administrative and electoral violations, election and general election crimes, election results disputes and administrative disputes election and general election countries. Whereas various institutions involved in the election and general election law include the General Election Commission (KPU), Election Supervisory Body and general election (Bawaslu), Honorary Election and Election Organizing Board (DKPP), Indonesian Police, District Courts and High Courts, Courts State Administration and State Administrative High Court, Supreme Court, Constitutional Court and Indonesian Broadcasting Commission. The complexity of the electoral law and general elections is inherent in the realm of election and general election crimes. The regulation and law enforcement of election and general election are a separate problem, especially in terms of the mechanism for resolving election and general election crimes. Recently the Supreme Court has issued Regulations relating to the settlement of election and general election crimes. This study will examine the mechanism for resolving criminal acts in elections and general elections in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2018 concerning the settlement of election crimes and general elections related to the politics of criminal law in Indonesia.
Article Details
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
References
El-Muhtaj, Majda, 2007 Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konstitusi Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group
MD, Mahfud. 1998. Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta, LP3ES
Nawawi Arief, Barda . 2005. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Santoso, Topo. 2006. Tindak Pidana Pemilu, Cetakan I, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Suyanto, Djoko. 2012. Evaluasi Pilkada dari Perspektif Ketahanan Nasional, dalam Demokrasi Lokal Evaluasi Pilkada di Indonesia, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press
Wiyono, Suko.2010. Pemilu Multi Partai dan Stabilitas Pemerintahan Presidensial di Indonesia, dalam Sirajuddin, dkk (Editor), Konstitusionalisme Demokrasi, Malang : In-Trans Publishing
Wawancara
Wawancara dengan Ketua Bawaslu Kabupaten Grobogan, Sabtu 1 September 2018
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-undang Dasar NRI Tahun 1945
Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum
Undang-undang Nomor 10 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Waikota Menjadi Undang-Undang
Media Online
www. bawaslu.go.id