US Right of Veto Against UN Resolution on Terrorism of ISIS Foreign Militias
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes how the US proposes a Veto Rights against a resolution issued by the United Nations against anti-terrorism, namely the Persecution, Reintegration, and Rehabilitation system for foreign ISIS militants who are stranded in Syrian camps. How was the veto issued by the United States against ISIS detention without a Veto provision based on the UDHR, International Humanitarian Law, and also the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols I and II 1977. This research was conducted to see the effect of the US veto on the fate of ISIS militias and the efforts and steps that can be done to solve the ISIS militia problem from the perspective of international law. The research method used was normative juridical. The result of the research was that the PRR resolution against ISIS militias was canceled with the veto power issued by the United States. Efforts that can be made in this regard include (1) continuing to prioritize the role of the PRR against ISIS foreign militants who are in Syrian Camps, focusing on dealing with foreign ISIS militias and countering terrorism through related conventions, such as the Universal Declaration Human Rights (UDHR), the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the 1907 Hague Convention, and the 1977 Additional Protocols I and II, and continue to urge all members of the state and all parties, that all measures taken to combat terrorism must fulfill their obligations under international law, including humanitarian law, international human rights law, and international refugee law with the impact of such actions
Article Details
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
References
Aryani, V. (2017). Serangan Rusia Terhadap Islamic State of Iraq And Syria (ISIS) Di Wilayah Suriah Menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 1-15. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/2266
Buana, T. Z. S., & Adwani, A. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penggunaan Hak Veto Amerika Serikat Sebagai Anggota Tetap Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan, 2(3), 677-688. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/kenegaraan/article/view/13576
Chadwick, E. (1996). Self-determination, terrorism and the international humanitarian law of armed conflict. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Diantha, I. M. P., & Mahartayasa, M. (2016). Hak Veto Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa dalam Kaitan dengan Prinsip Persamaan Kedaulatan. Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 4(3), 1-7. https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/20791
El Renova, E. S. (2016). Kedudukan Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) dalam Hukum Internasional. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Hardianti, S. D., Widagdo, S., & Nurdin, N. (2015). Akibat Penggunaan Hak Veto oleh Amerika Serikat terhadap Kasus Agresi Israel di Gaza. Jurnal Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 1-20. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/985/974
Hasibuan, H., Sudarsono, S., Nurjaya, I. N., & Sugiri, B. (2017). Radicalization in the Teaching Religion and Its Relations with Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Brawijaya Law Journal, 4(2), 161-174.
Islami, M. N. (2017). Terorisme Sebuah Upaya Perlawanan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kusumaatmadja, M. (1963). Konvensi Djenewa Tahun 1949 mengenai Pelindungan Korban Perang. Bandung: Dhiwantara.
Marzuki, M. P. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Nasution, A. R. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Terorisme Sebagai ‘Extraordinary Crime’ dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Nasional. Deliberatif, 1(1), 1-23. https://ojs.uscnd.ac.id/index.php/deliberatif/article/view/7
Riza, S. (2006). Dimensi Internasional Terorisme. Jakarta: Penerbit Spektrum.
Salim, H. R. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Stateless Person di Indonesia. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v4i1.20919
Soejipto, A. W. (Ed.). (2015). HAM dan Politik Internasional: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Soemitro, D. P. (2015). Fenomena Gerakan Radikalisme ISIS dalam Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik), 1(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v1i2.635
Soeprapto, S. (1995). Hubungan Internasional, Sistem, Interaksi dan Perilaku. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suwardi, S. S., & Kurnia, I. (2019). Hukum Perjanjian Internasional. Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika.
Wahid, A., & Sidik, M. I. (2004). Kejahatan Terorisme: Perspektif Agama, HAM, dan Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Widagdo, S., Kusumaningrum, A., & Prasetyo, D. A. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Perjanjian Internasional. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Yudiono, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Laws and Regulations
International Humanitarian Law.
The 1949 Geneva Convention.
The 1977 Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Convention on the protection of victims of international armed conflict.
The 1977 Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Convention on the Protection of non-international armed conflicts.
The UN Charter.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Other Sources
Allen, Elizabeth F. Civil Liberty Woes When Dealing with Uncivil Foes: The Effect of Civil Liberties and Human Right on Counterterrorism Operations. Naval War College Newport RI Joint Military Operations Dept, 2014. Accessed on 16 December 2020 at 11.33 WIB.
AS Veto Resolusi PBB Milisi Asing ISIS. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20200901183417-134-s541699/as-veto-resolusi-pbb-pemulangan-milisi-asing-isis. Accessed 13 October 2020 at 13.12 WIB
Dewan Keamanan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewan_Keamanan_Perserikatan_Bangsa-Bangsa#:~:text=Dewan%20Keamanan%20PBB%20adalah%20salah,menjaga%20perdamaian%20dan%20keamanan%20internasional.&text=4.%20melaksanakan%20keputusan%20Dewan%20Keamanan,atau%20dengan%20cara%2Dcara%20lainnya. Accessed on 28 October 2020 at 00.53 WIB.
Draft Resolution UN Council S/2020/852 https://undocs.org/en/S/2020/852. Accessed on January 25, 2021, at 12.52 WIB.
Kemlu, https://kemlu.go.id/portal/id . Accessed on October 13, 2020, at 23.16 WIB.
Resolusition 2490, Ancaman terhadap perdamaian dan keamanan internasional https://undocs.org/en/S/RES/2490(2019) Accessed on 6 December 2020 at 11.00 WIB
Resolution 2482, Ancaman terhadap perdamaian dan keamanan internasional https://undocs.org/S/RES/2482(2019) Accessed on December 6, 2020 at 13.25 WIB
US Veto Indonesia's Resolution in the UN Security Council, https://republika.co.id/berita/qfypti459/as-veto-resolusi-indonesia-di-dewan-keamanan-pbb. Accessed 13 October 2020 at 12.51 WIB.
Written Record UN Council S/2020/870 https://undocs.org/en/S/2020/870. Accessed on January 25, 2021, at 12.54 WIB.