Main Article Content
This study aimed to find out (1) whether the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability with Treffinger learning model assisted by problem cards could achieve classical completeness or not, (2) whether the average of students’ mathematical creative thinking ability with Treffinger learning model assisted by problem card can reach the Minimum Mastery Learning Criteria or KKM, (3) whether students' mathematical creative thinking ability with Treffinger's learning model assisted by problem cards was better than students’ with PBL learning model, and (4) the analysis of students' mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of students' learning interests. This research was a mixed method research. The population of this research was XI grade students of State Vocational High School 2 Rembang. The subjects of this research were selected by using random sampling techniqu. Then, XI grade of shipping engineering class B as class experiment class XI A as PBL learning class. The data collection covered method tests, questionnaires, observations, and interviews. Afterwards, the result showed that that: (1) the mathematical creative thinking ability of students in Treffinger learning assisted by problem cards achieved the classical completeness, (2) the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in Treffinger learning assisted by problem card achieved the Minimum Mastery Learning Criteria, (3) the students’ creative thinking ability with Treffinger learning model assisted by problem card was better than students with PBL learning model, and (4) the students’ mathematical creative thinking with high interest in learning was better than students’ with the low learning interest.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
UJME is a peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of mathematics education. This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
Barak, M. & Y. Doppelt. (2000). Using Portfolio to Enhance Creative Thinking.
The Journal of Technology Studies Summer-Fall 2000, 26(2): 16-25.
Career Center Maine Department of Labor. (2004). Today’s Work Competence in
Kpolovie, P.J., A.I. Joe, & T. Okoto. (2014). Academic Achievement Predictiont: Role of Interest in Learning and Attitude toward School. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(11):73-100.
Lestari, I. (2013). Pengaruh Waktu Belajar dan Minat Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 3(2): 115- 125.
Mustaqim, B., Riyadi, & I. Sujadi. (2013). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS). Jurnal FKIP UNS, 1(3).
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (Decree of The Indonesian Minister of Education and Culture Number 21, 2016)
Potur, A. A. & O. Barkul. (2009). Gender and Creative Thinking in Education: A Theoretical and Experimental Overview. University Faculty of Architecture Journal, 6(2): 44-57.
Pramadita, A.A., Mashuri, & R. Arifudin. (2013). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horray terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Minat Belajar. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education (UJME), 2(2).
Rohaeti. (2013). Penerapan Model Treffinger pada Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Matematika Kontemporer.
Siagian, R. (2012). Pengaruh Minat dan Kebiasaan Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 2(2): 122-131
Silver, E.A. (1997). Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Thinking in Problem Posing. Analyses, 29(3): 75-80.
Siswono, T .E.Y. (2007). Konstruksi Teoritik Tentang Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan, Forum Pendidikan dan Ilmu
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Triwibowo, Z., N.K. Dwidayanti, & Sugiman. 2017. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VII Melalui Model Pembelajaran Treffinger dengan Pendekatan Open-Ended. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education (UJME), 6(3).