The The Function of Rechtsverwerking Regulation as an Instrument of Acquisition of Land Rights Fungsi Pengaturan Rechtsverwerking Sebagai Instrumen Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The function of rechtsverwerking regulation that contained in PP Number 24 of 1997 gives legal certainty to the acquisition of land rights. The abandonment of land carried out by a person of the community does not fulfill the obligation to maintain the land rights, which results in that person can lose the land rights and ends with the issuance of a new land certificate to a person or legal material that in good faith maintains the abandoned land. Rechtsverwerking is related to the social function of land that prioritizes the usefulness of the land among the community. The rechtsverwerking arrangement gives a five-year deadline to the party who feels they own the wasteland to sue the holder of a new certificate of the land. Some examples of rechtsverwerking is contained in Supreme Court Ruling No. 979/K/Sip/1971 and Supreme Court Review Decision Number 336 PK/Pdt/2015. The enforcement of the rechtsverwerking institution in Indonesia has not actually been able to be carried out according to its purpose, this is proven by the number of lawsuits against certificates in state courts or the cancellation of certificates in the State Administrative Court after five years since the issuance of new certificates. However, it does not mean that the certificate of land rights does not guarantee legal certainty, because the certificate is recognized as a strong evidence of rights.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
FOSTER, SHEILA R., and DANIEL BONILLA. “The Social Function of Property: A Comparative Law Perspective,” no. November (2011).
Gama e Silva, Zenobio Abel Gouvêa Perelli da. “Economic Aspects of the Demand for Commercial Forest Land in the State of Acre, Brazil.” Forest Policy and Economics 138, no. January (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102704.
Irfan, Muhammad, and Nia Kurniati. “Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah Dan Eksistensi Lembaga Rechtsverwerking Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An 1, no. 2 (2018): 163. https://doi.org/10.24198/acta.v1i2.113.
Kubitza, Christoph, Vijesh V. Krishna, Kira Urban, Zulkifli Alamsyah, and Matin Qaim. “Land Property Rights, Agricultural Intensification, and Deforestation in Indonesia.” Ecological Economics 147, no. January (2018): 312–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.021.
Li, Na, Liang Tang, Xuchao Che, Xiaoping Shi, and Xianlei Ma. “Does the Democratization Level of Village Governance Affect Perceptions of Security and Integrity of Land Rights? -An Analysis from the Perspective of Social Network Abundance.” Journal of Rural Studies 94, no. 1 (2022): 305–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.06.013.
Ma, Meilin. “Interdependent Investments in Attached and Movable Assets under Insecure Land Rights.” China Economic Review 77, no. July 2022 (2023): 101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101909.
Mueller, Bernardo. “Property Rights and Violence in Indigenous Land in Brazil.” Land Use Policy 116, no. January (2022): 106063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106063.
Nober, Pasolang Pasapan, and Lisma Lumentut. “Penerapan Asas Rechtsverwerking Dalam Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Kajian Hukum Terhadap Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 336 Pk/Pdt/2015).” Paulus Legal Research Vol.1, no. 1 (2021): 1–8.
Oka Setiawan, I Ketut, Tetti Samosir, and Indah Harlina. “Penerapan Rechtsverwerking Yang Ada Pada Hak Ulayat Menguatkan Sistem Publikasi Positif Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah.” Otentik’s : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 4, no. 2 (2022): 114–35. https://doi.org/10.35814/otentik.v4i2.3508.
Ondetti, Gabriel. “The Social Function of Property, Land Rights and Social Welfare in Brazil.” Land Use Policy 50 (2016): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.028.
Suartining, Ni Ketut, and Benny Djaja. “Land Rights in the Land Law System in Indonesia According to the Basic Agrarian Law Number 5 of 1960.” Journal of Social Research 2, no. 6 (2023): 1775–85. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i6.903.
Tanah, Mengatasi Sengketa. “Dosen Biasa Dan Anggota Pusat Studi Hukum Agraria (PSHA) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti 50,” 1997, 50–67.
Yukun, Guo, and Zhou Yan. “Discussion of Commercial Real Estate with A Short Remaining Period of Land Use Rights on Evaluation Thoughts of Income Approach.” Procedia Computer Science 199 (2021): 103–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.013.
Zwart, Pim de, and Phylicia Soekhradj. “Sweet Equality: Sugar, Property Rights, and Land Distribution in Colonial Java.” Explorations in Economic History 88, no. April 2022 (2023): 101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2023.101513.