Case Study of Recognition of Land Rights of Dayak Customary Law Community in Central Kalimantan in Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-X/2012 Studi Kasus Pengakuan Terhadap Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah Pada Putusan MK Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012
Main Article Content
Abstract
Agrarian Law is regulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Principles of Agrarian Law (UUPA) which regulates the control, ownership, allocation, use and control of land use aimed at the greatest prosperity of the people. Based on Article 3 of Law Number 5 of 1960, the recognition of customary rights is limited to two things, namely regarding its existence and implementation. The method used in this study is the normative legal research method by approaching legislation and conceptually using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. One of the problems regarding the recognition of customary land rights is customary land rights that occur in Central Kalimantan Province. The existence of the Dayak Customary Council of Central Kalimantan Province as a customary institution that has been emphasized in Regional Regulation Number 16 of 2008 concerning Dayak Customary Institutions in Central Kalimantan, is expected to be able to maintain, preserve and defend the values of customary law. Especially after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-X/2012, which confirmed that Customary Forests are Forests located in customary areas, and are no longer State Forests. Likewise with the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 52 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Recognition and Protection of Customary Law Communities, which also provides space for recognition of customary law communities. This regulation certainly provides hope for customary law communities to obtain recognition and protection of the rights they have, namely Customary Territory, Customary Law, Wealth and/or Customary Objects and Institutions/Government Systems.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Rianda Dirkareshza, ‘Antinomi Regulations on the Recognition and Enforcement of Ulayat Right from Indigenous Peoples’, International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04.04 (2021), 596–602
Dr. Isnaini, SH, M.Hum, and M.Hum Anggreni A. Lubis, SH, Hukum Agrari : Kajian Komprehensif, 2022
Ivonne Laturette, Adonia, ‘Ulayat Right of Customary Law Community’, Pattimura Law Journal, 1.2 (2017), 131–44
Kristiani, Verlia, ‘Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Bagi Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Kajian Dan Implementasi)’, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 11.1 (2020)
Laturette, Adonia Ivonne, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat Pada Kawasan Hutan’, Sasi, 27.1 (2021), 102
Perbawati, Candra, Malicia Evendia, Ade Arif Firmansyah, and Yulia Neta, ‘Legal Discourse on Customary Forest Determination Progressive Law Based’, Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17.1 (2023), 17–30
Rachman, Syaiful, M. Chairul Basrun Umanailo, Mustamam, Muhammad Arsyad, Ode Monto Bauto La, Jamaluddin Hos, and others, ‘Juridical Overview of Existence Community Customary Forests’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 6.39 (2021), 6074–80
Redi, Ahmad, Yuwono Prianto, Tundjung Herning Sitabuana, and Ade Adhari, ‘Constitutionality Rights of Indigenous People on the Ulayat Rumpon Rights In Lampung Province’, Constitutional Journalournal, 14.3 (2018), 471
Salamat, Yusuf, ‘Pengaturan Mengenai Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat ( Studi Kasus Pengakuan Terhadap Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dayak Di Kalimantan Tengah ) ( Case Study of Recognition of the Dayak Adat Law Community Land In’, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13.04 (2016), 411–20
Zahroni, Zahroni, and Faisal Santiago, ‘Ulayat Rights in A Human Rights Perspective’, 2021, 3–8