Abstract
The poor results of national and international assessments make the national curriculum get criticism. Meanwhile, the Cambridge curriculum gets popular because of its quality. Textbooks as curriculum manifestations affect student learning. This study describes Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and the dominance of its level in the Cambridge Primary Mathematics 4 textbooks which are Teacher's Resources and Learner's Book. This study uses a directed qualitative content analysis method. This research shows that all HOTS levels (analyze, evaluate, and create) are spread across four major themes (number, measure, data handling, and geometry) Teacher's Resource and Learner's Book. Theoretically, HOTS in the Teacher's Resource and Learner's Book can teach critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication because the learning content of HOTS in this book uses a student-centered approach and the teacher actively provides scaffolding using open-ended questions, discussions, and group activities. HOTS level creating is dominant in Teacher's Resource and analysis is dominant in Learner's Book.
Abstrak
Hasil assesmen nasional dan internasional yang konsisten buruk membuat kurikulum nasional menuai kritik. Sementara itu, kurikulum Cambridge diminati sejumlah kalangan karena dianggap lebih berkualitas. Buku teks sebagai manifestasi kurikulum berpengaruh terhadap pembelajaran siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mendeskripsikan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dan dominasi levelnya dalam buku teks Cambridge Primary Mathematics 4 yang terdiri dari Teacher’s Resources dan Learner’s Book. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis isi kualitatif terarah. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ketiga level HOTS (menganalisis, mengevaluasi, dan mencipta) tersebar dalam keempat tema besar (number, measure, handling data, dan geometry) Teacher’s Resource dan Learner’s Book. Secara teoretis, HOTS dalam Teacher’s Resource dan Learner’s Book dapat membelajarkan critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, dan communication karena pembelajaran muatan HOTS dalam buku ini terpusat pada siswa dan guru aktif memberikan scaffolding menggunakan pertanyaan open-ended, diskusi, serta aktivitas berkelompok. HOTS dalam Teacher’s Resource didominasi oleh level mencipta, sedangkan Learner’s Book didominasi level menganalisis.
References
Abosalem, Y. (2016). Analyzing and Comparing the Two Grade-Ten Mathematics Textbooks Versions (Arabic and English) Used in Abu Dhabi Schools. Pedagogical Research, 1(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10. 20897/ lectito.201612.
Alasan Guru Indonesia Belum Wujudkan Merdeka Belajar untuk Siswa. (2019). Kumparan.com. https://kumparan.com/kumparansains/alasan-guru-indonesia-belum-wujudkan-merdeka-belajar-untuk-siswa-1sL8jFmwYAY/full
Anderson, L.W dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Asesmen (Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ardana, I. M., Ariawan, I. P. W., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2017). MeasuringThe Effectiveness of BLCS Model (Bruner, Local Culture, Scaffolding) in Mathematics Teaching by Using Expert System-based CSE-UCLA. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 7(4), 1. https:// doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2017.04.01.
Babak Baru Kurikulum “Cambridge International” di Indonesia. (2018). Kompas.com https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2018/08/02/22080731/babak-baru-kurikulum-cambridge-international-di-indonesia?page=all
Collins, R. (2014). Agustus 24. Skills for the 21st Century: Teaching Higher-Order Thinking. http://www.curriculum.edu. au/leader/teaching_higher_order_thinking,37431.html?issueID=12910 (Diunduh pada 5 Juli 2020).
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your English Coursebook. Macmillan Education.
Diocolano, N. G., & Nafiah, N. (2019). Implementasi Kurikulum Cambridge di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.v7i1.8636.
Driana, E. (2012). Gawat Darurat Pendidikan. http://www.kompas.com/nasional/ read/2012/12 /14/02344589/twitter.com. (Diunduh 22 Desember 2019).
Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook Research in Mathematics Education: Development Status and Directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10. 1007 /s11858-013-0539-x
Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Untuk Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Teori Belajar Ausubel. Pythagoras, 11(1), 182-192. http://dx.doi. org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.1064.
Golafshani, N. (2013). Teachers' Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics with Manipulatives. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 36(3), 137-159.
Hadar, L. (2017). Opportunities To Learn: Mathematics textbooks and Students’ Achievements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 153-166. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.002.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1049732305276687.
Kiromiah, E. W., Asih, V.Y., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2020). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. TERAMPIL: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 7(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.24042/terampil.v7i2.7682.
Larbi, E., & Mavis, O. (2016). The Use of Manipulatives in Mathematics Education. Journal of Education and practice, 7(36), 53-61.
Pratama, G. S. (2019). Analisis Muatan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Buku Teks Matematika SMP (Komparasi Buku Indonesia dan Malaysia). [Unpublished thesis]. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Ruslan, A. S., & Santoso, B. (2013). Pengaruh Pemberian Soal Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 4(2), 138-150. https://doi. org/10.15294/kreano.v4i2.3138
Santo, M., (2011). From Low to High Order Thinking Skills in CLIL Science Primary Textbooks: A Challenge for Teachers and Publishers. Thesis. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Sievert, H., van den Ham, A. K., Niedermeyer, I., & Heinze, A. (2019). Effects of Mathematics Textbooks on The Development of Primary School Children's Adaptive Expertise in Arithmetic. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101716. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.006
Sulistyani, N. & Deviana, T. (2019). Analisis Bahan Ajar Matematika Kelas V SD di Kota Malang. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 133-141.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, O. M., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 Internationa Results in Mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Tuli, N., & Mantri, A. (2020). Usability Principles for Augmented Reality-Based Kindergarten Applications. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.089.
van den Ham, A. K. & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133-140.