Peningkatan Keterampilan Profesional Guru-Guru SD Gugus Ganesha Windusari Magelang Melalui Pelatihan Implementasi Model Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) Bermuatan Six Pillars Of Character Improving the Professional Skills of Elementary School Teachers Ganesha Windusari Magelang Through Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) Implementation Training With Six Pillars Of Character

Main Article Content

Hartati Hartati
Novi Setyasto
Putri Yanuarita Sutikno
Renggani Renggani

Abstract

Enactment of Permendikbud No. 22 of 2016 concerning Process Standards implies a shift in the teaching paradigm to a learning paradigm, the use of a scientific approach (scientific), and an integrated thematic so that it is necessary to apply problem-based learning. However, the reality on the ground is different. Based on the results of a preliminary study conducted in the Ganesha Windusari Cluster, Magelang consisting of 50 elementary school teachers and located on the slopes of Mount Sumbing, it shows that approximately 80% of teachers (or about 40 teachers) still have difficulty implementing disclosure-based learning/research in the classroom, especially in the manufacture of learning tools that contain the cultivation of attitudes or character values ​​in accordance with process standards. The solution that can be applied is the provision of training activities for the Implementation of the Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) Learning Model with Six Pillars of Character. The purpose of this service activity is to provide training to elementary school teachers in the Ganesha Group in implementing the IBL model containing the six pillars of character in learning in elementary school. The method of this service activity is in the form of training for elementary school teachers in the Dewadaru II Cluster. The training methods used in this service are: lecture, question and answer, practice, and simulation. This training activity was attended by 38 teachers of SD Gugus Ganesha with the training location at SDN Banjarsari, Windusari District, Magelang. The outputs resulting from this training activity are an increase in the knowledge and skills of teachers as indicated by: 1) the composition of 30 learning tools with the IBL model containing the six pillars of character; 2) an increase in the average post-test result (75.4) compared to the average pre-test result (32.6); 3) 25 out of 38 participants gave a very positive response to the quality of the training materials and 13 participants gave a positive response with an average score of 4.66.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hartati, Hartati, Novi Setyasto, Putri Sutikno, and Renggani Renggani. 2019. “Peningkatan Keterampilan Profesional Guru-Guru SD Gugus Ganesha Windusari Magelang Melalui Pelatihan Implementasi Model Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) Bermuatan Six Pillars Of Character”. Jurnal Panjar: Pengabdian Bidang Pembelajaran 1 (1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.15294/panjar.v1i1.28461.
Section
Articles

References

Arends, Richard I. 2012. Learning to Teach. New York: McGrow-Hill Companies, Inc.
Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. 2014. Inquiry-based learning for faculty and institutional development: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J.M. 2015. Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators. Wagon Lana: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Carfora, J. M. 2011. Navigating between teaching, learning and inquiry. International HETL Review. Retrieved from https://www.hetl.org/opinion-articles/teaching-learning-inquiry.
Fullan, M. 2013. Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Don Mills, ON: Pearson.
Hattie, J. 2009. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 metaanalyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Josephson, Michael. 2009. The Six Pillars of Character Study Guide. America: Josephson Institute.
Josephson, Michael. 2012. Six Pillars Illustrated Poster Lesson Plan. America: Josephson Institute.
Keselman, A. 2003. Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 898–921. doi:10.1002/tea.10115.
Lee, V. S. 2013. Supporting students’ search for a meaningful life through inquiry-guided learning. In Kovbasyuk & Blessinger (Eds.), Meaning-centered education: International perspectives and explorations in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M. (2015). Phases of Inquiry Based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle. Educational Research Review, 14 (2015), 47-61.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, S. 2012. Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9, 81–95.
Permendikbud Nomor 81a Tahun 2013 tentang Implimentasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Permendikbud No. 24 tahun 2016 tentang kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar pelajaran pada kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Sweetland, Julie. 2008. Inspired Issue Brief: Inquiry Based Teaching. Washington, DC: Center for Inspired Teaching.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2