Considering the Legal Efforts of Dispute Decisions on Election Results of the Constitutional Court

Main Article Content

Galang Taufani

Abstract

Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution confirms that the Constitutional Court (MK) has the authority to adjudicate at the first and last level with a final decision to review the Law against the Constitution. Related to election disputes, the Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate dispute cases and the Constitutional Court's decision is final and binding. It is undeniable that this matter becomes a debate, what if in the course of finding new evidence (novum) or what is the possibility of legal remedies in election disputes. This paper will try to explore what is the philosophy of the legal remedies and how it might be used in election disputes. By appealing to philosophical thinking it is hoped that a new thought can be drawn on these possibilities.

Article Details

How to Cite
Taufani, G. (2018). Considering the Legal Efforts of Dispute Decisions on Election Results of the Constitutional Court. Law Research Review Quarterly, 4(3), 861-878. https://doi.org/10.15294/snh.v4i03.27101
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLE

References

Soetandyo Wignjosubroto, (1993) “Beberapa Persoalan Paradigmatik dalam Teori dan Konsekuensinya atas Pilihan Metode yang akan Dipakai (Metode Kuantitatif Versus Metode Kualitatif)”, Makalah, (Pascasarjanan Universitas Airlangga, 1993).
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, (2004) Pengantar Metode Penenlitian Hukum, (Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Perasada,
Hans George Gadamer. (2007) The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings. Edited by Richard E Palmer. (Illionis..Northwestern University Press. 2007).
Hans George Gadamer. (2006). Truth and Method. Continuum Publising Group. New York. p. 15Gregory Leyh. Legal Hermeneutics : History, Theory, and Practice. (California: University of California Press).
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali.
Fickar Hadjar, (2003), Pokok-Pokok Pikiran dan Rancangan Undang-. Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi, KRHN dan Kemitraan, Jakarta.
Daniel Little, (1991), Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science, Oxford: Westview Press.
David E Linge, (1976), ”Editor’s Introduction,” Hans-Georg Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics, Berkeley, University of California Press,
Maruar Siahaan, (2011) Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta :
Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Tri Andrisman, (2010) , Hukum Acara Pidana, Lampung, Universitas Lampung.
Lilik Mulyadi. (2007) Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya.
Ahmad Rifa (2010), Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.