Protection of Whistleblowers in Election Crime
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to find out and analyze the protection of whistleblowers or reporters in election crime, here the author uses a type of normative juridical research with the statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach, this is motivated by elections held once every 5 years. It is undeniable that violations often occur before the election and when the election is held, according to Bawaslu that there are 3,133 cases of violations either in the form of findings or reports as referred to in the 2018 elections in 171 regions. So that in following up on election crime, there must be a role from whistleblowers from the public, but there is fear from the reporter so that he does not dare to report the crime, so protection against whistleblowers is needed. The election has not clearly stipulated in the form of protection given, one of the problems is that the reported party reports the reporter again so that the consequences are not continuing the case from investigation to incrach decision but only limited to the level of investigation caused by obstacles experienced is evidence that is owned by the complainant, then the whistleblower should be given protection such as having the right of immunity as cannot be prosecuted criminal or civil, protecting in order to avoid ri from economic, political and social discrimination.
Article Details
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
References
ï€ Prakoso, Joko, 1992, Tindak Pidana Pemilu (1987) dan Sintong Silaban, Tindak Pidana Pemilu (Suatu Tinajuan Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pelkasaan Pemilu Yang Jujur dan Adil) , Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
ï€ Reksodiputro, Mardjono, Pembocor Rahasia/Wistle Blowers dan Penyadapan (Wiretapping, Electronic Interception) Dalam Menanggulangi Kejahatan Di Indonesia, Wacana Goverminyboard, Jakarta.
ï€ Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2013, .Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Kencana, Jakarta.
ï€ Hadjon, Philipus M, 1987, Perlindungan Bagi Rakyat diIndonesia, Bina Ilmu,Surabaya.
ï€ Rahardjo, Satjipto, 2000, Ilmu hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Cetakan ke-V, Bandung.
ï€ Soekanto, Soerjono, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Ui Press. Jakarta.
ï€ Santoso, Topo, 2006, Tindak Pidana Pemilu, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
ï€ Dempster, Quentin, 2006, Whistleblower (Para Pengungkap Fakta), Elsam, Jakarta.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
ï€ Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban
Tesis
ï€ Setiono, 2004, Rule of Law(Supremasi Hukum), Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
ï€ Muchsin, 2003, Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia, magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
ï€ Thurmudhi, Imam, 2011, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Kasus Korupsi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (Studi Kasus Susno Duadji), Tesis, Program Studi Magister (S2) Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Majalah
ï€ Buletin Kesaksian, Edisi 2 Tahun 2012
Internet
ï€ http://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/hasil-pengawasan-pemilu/data-dugaan-pelanggaran-pilkada-2018-28-juni-2018, diakses 01 Oktober 2018