Reconstruction of the Criminal System in Corruption
Main Article Content
Abstract
Corruption crimes is an iceberg phenomenon whose cases increase every year in Indonesia. The crime is carried out by person, groups of people, and corporations. Sadly, the perpetrators of corruption are also dragging the government or authorities, both executive, legislative, and judicial institutions. Policy by policy has been issued and there are even ad hoc institutions and special courts that handle these crimes. But in fact, this problem still not over, so there are indications that policies have not succeeded in overcoming corruption. The problems that have troubled the nation are very important to be studied scientifically. Reconstruction is needed for law enforcement efforts to deal with criminal acts of corruption, especially in its criminal system. This study aims to determine the criminal system of corruption and the reconstruction of the criminal system on corruption. This study uses a type of normative juridical research with the specification of the research is descriptive analytical. The data used is secondary data obtained through librarian and documentation studies which are then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the research, the results are: First, the criminal system on corruption acts refers to Law No. 39 of 1999 as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 as its lex specialis. Second, the reconstruction of the criminal system can be directed at the rules of legislation governing material, formal, and implementing criminal law. In this case the researcher highlights criminal sanctions which include form, severity, and indicators of imposition of sanctions, and the methods of execution and coaching.
Article Details
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
References
Arif, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditiya Bakti, 2002.
. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dalam Persfektif Kajian Perbandingan. Bandung: Citra Aditiya Bakti, 2005.
Gultom, Maidin. Suatu Analisis tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Cet. 1. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2018.
Hartanti, E. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Cet. 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.
. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Mas, Mawar. Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Cet. 1. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, 2014.
b. Perundang-undangan
Sekretariat Negara RI, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Tth.
Sekretariat Negara RI, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta, 1999.
Sekretariat Negara RI, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta, 2001
c. Artikel dalam Jurnal/Skripsi/Tesis/Prosiding
Heniarti, Dini Dewi, Dian Andriasari, Chepi Ali Firman, Singgih Puja Pangestu, Prasetyo Nanda, “Rekonstruksi Pemikiran tentang Konsep Sanksi Pidana dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Ius Constituendumâ€. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan PKM Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Humaniora. Vol. 5 No. 1, halaman 73-82, 2015.
Ismaidar. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Rekontruksi Sanksi Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi untuk Mencapaian Tujuan Pemidanaanâ€. Jurnal Ilmiah Skylandsea. Vol. 2 No. 1, halaman 53-61, 2018.
Kansil, Fernando I. Sanksi Pidana Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Menurut Kuhp dan di Luar KUHP. Jurnal Lex Crimen. Vol. III No. 3, 2014.
Supeno, Bambang Joyo. “Rekonstruksi Sistem Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Kerangka Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Menuju Pemidanaan yang Berkeadilanâ€. Tesis Pascasarjana, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2018.
d. Website
Akbar, Caesar dan Ali Akhmad Noor Hidayat. “ICW Sebut Jumlah Kasus Korupsi Dana Desa Meningkat Setiap Tahunâ€, (online), (https://m.tempo.co/, diases, Kamis, 28 Maret 2019), 2018.
Chrysnha, “Data ICW: 104 Kepala Daerah Terjerat Korupsi, Sebanyak 29 Orang di Tahun 2018â€, (online), (https://m.tribunnews.com/, diases, Kamis, 28 Maret 2019), 2018.
Erdianto, Kristian. “ICW: Dalam Enam Tahun, 28 Aparat Lembaga Peradilan Ditangkap KPKâ€, (online), (https://m.kompas.com/, diases, Kamis, 28 Maret 2019), 2018.
Fadhil, Haris. “Korupsi di 2018, Terbanyak Libatkan Legislatifâ€, (online), (https://m.detik.com/, diases, Kamis, 28 Maret 2019), 2018.
Gabrillin, Abba. “Daftar Panjang Korupsi Dunia Peradilan dan Fenomena Hakim Tipikorâ€, (online), (https://m.kompas.com/, diases, Kamis, 28 Maret 2019), 2018.
Hariyanto, Ibnu. ICW: Dalam 6 Bulan, 226 Kasus Korupsi Rugikan Negara Rp 1,83 Tâ€, (online), (https://m.detik.com/, diases, Kamis, 28 Maret 2019), 2017.
Solehudin, Imam dan Intan Piliang. “Kasus Suap Bupati Jepara, KPK Tahan Hakim PN Semarang, (online), (https://jawapos.com/, diases, Kamis, 28 Maret 2019), 2018.