Profit Sharing Agreement Between Eti Country and Petuanan Area In the context of Capacity Building
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Eti Village, which is located in the West Seram sub-district, West Seram Regency, there is still an agreement for marine and plantation products sharing between the Petuanan Region and the State Government of Eti Village as the parent country in the context of capacity building. This Profit Sharing Agreement is known as the ngase system and has been implemented from 1979 to 2021This study aims to identify and analyze the profit sharing agreement from the Petuanan Area to the Parent State in the context of capacity building, and also the legal consequences of the revenue sharing agreement from the Petuanan Area to the Parent State in the context of capacity building. In accordance with the problems and objectives of this research, the type of research used is sociolegal research, namely a combination research method between doctrinal law research methods and empirical legal research methods. Based on the author's study, the ngase system is a profit-sharing agreement in oral form which is applied in the Eti Country and applies as an agreement so that it has binding legal consequences.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
References
Benyamin & Thabrani. (1987). Tanya Jawab Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Agraria.
M. Tjoanda, M.V.G Pariela, Y. Hetharie, R. F. S. (2021). Covid-19 sebagai Bentuk Overmacht dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit. SASI, 95. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/447
M.V.G. Pariela. (n.d.). Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba. SASI, 43. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/issue/view/9
Prodjodikoro, W. (2012). Azaz-Azaz Hukum Perjanjian.
R. Subekti. (1987). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa.
Sopamena, R. F. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451
Syah, D. (2020). Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Bagi Hasil Atas Tanah Pertanian Antara Pemilik Tanah dengan Petani. Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 1(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v1i3.10
Urip Santoso. (2013). Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehensif.
Y. Hetharie. (n.d.). Perjanjian Nominee sebagai Sarana Penguasaan Hak Milik atas Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. SASI, 30.