Reducing the Company’s Insolvency: How suspension of debt payment obligation and bankruptcy proceedings help the company?

Main Article Content

Deyola Agasie
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-6671
Rani Apriani

Abstract

Corporate insolvency will have an unfavorable effect on the country's economy. Currently many companies are facing the threat of bankruptcy applications in the Commercial Court because difficulty of paying the company's debts to its creditors. In the midst of the situation the number of Covid-19 cases that occurred in Indonesia, it has a negative impact with the decline in the performance of business actors due to the crisis. From that situation, it results in a decrease in the amount of income to the difficulty of paying debts or credit to creditors. To reduce the increase in insolvency, the government seeks the enactment of a moratorium on PKPU and Bankruptcy whose implementation will pay attention to the development of Covid-19 pandemic conditions. This research aims to find out how the implications in implementing a moratorium on PKPU and Bankruptcy in order to reduce the company's insolvency and how its legal protection efforts for creditors and debtors. This research is Normative juridical with a Statute Approach. The results of this study are the implications that will occur in the enactment of the moratorium on PKPU and Bankruptcy and legal protection for the parties under Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Delay of Debt Payment Obligations.  By fulfilling the terms and conditions as intended, the conclusion obtained is that the implementation of the moratorium has a positive and negative impact on the parties and obtains protection and is justified by applicable law but must be in accordance with the applicable provisions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Agasie, D., & Apriani, R. (2022). Reducing the Company’s Insolvency: How suspension of debt payment obligation and bankruptcy proceedings help the company?. Law Research Review Quarterly, 8(2), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v8i2.53813
Section
REVIEW ARTICLE

References

Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. (2016). Tinjauan Hukum Bisnis: Urgensi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Pkpu) Dalam Kepailitan. Diakses dari https://www.academia.edu/37572961/TINJAUAN_HUKUM_BISNIS_URGENSI_PENUNDAAN_KEWAJIBAN_PEMBAYARAN_UTANG_PKPU_DALAM_KEPAILITAN.

Fuady, Munir. (2001). Pengantar Hukum Bisnis. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.

Fuady, Munir. (2005). Hukum Kepailitan Dalam Teori Dan Praktik (Edisi Revisi disesuaikan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004). Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hukum Online. Kepailitan Momok Menakutkan Di Masa Pandemi. Diakses pada November, 02, 2022, dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5f572d24a2238/kepailitan--momok-menakutkan-dimasa-pandemi?page=3

Jono. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

Rihwanto, Y. (2016). Kedudukan Debitor Pasca Penetapan PKPU Oleh Pengadilan Niaga (Studi Kasus Pada Koperasi Serba Usaha Persada Madani) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Sukirno, Timur. (2001). Tanggung Jawab Kurator Terhadap Harta Pailit dan Penerapan Actio Pauliana. Bandung : Alumni.

Sunarmi. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan Edisi 2. Jakarta : Softmedia.

Supramono, Gatot. (2013). Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Jakarta : Kencana.

Susanto, A. M., Malonda, E., Rosadi, I., & Rizki, M. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Bank atas Upaya PKPU (Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang) dari Pihak Ke-3 (Tiga). JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM, 3(1).

Usman, Rachmadi. (2004). Dimensi Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.