Law Enforcement of Corruption Crimes in the State-Owned Enterprises Sector in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Corruption often occurs in public service institutions, especially BUMN. This research was conducted to examine corruption in the BUMN sector with the Aristotelian ethical theory. Aristoteles theory of ethics serves to deliver humans to achieve the highest goals of their lives through ratios and make humans the main humans. This study uses a normative juridical research method in which the use of this method uses a conceptual approach and legislation. Regarding the conclusions obtained from this research, the definition of corruption is that it is a matter of moral deviation from a moral problem in humans. Therefore, law and the economy are not the main factors that encourage corruption in the BUMN sector. In the abuse of power in the BUMN sector which is the starting point for corruption, it is clear that there is a moral charge in this case, an element of intent. Thus, it is clear that corruption is closely related to moral issues in humans, in this case, BUMN officials. This is where the portrait of Aristotle's ethical philosophy is very visible in the phenomenon of corruption in the BUMN sector in Indonesia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
References
Akmar, Diya UI and Syafrijal Mughni Madda. “Memaknai Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor Berdasarkan Filsafat Hukum.” Supremasi Hukum 17, no. 2 (2021): 40–47.
Aslam, Nibraska. “Pencegahan Korupsi Di Sektor BUMN Dalam Perspektif Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia,” Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi 7, no. 2 (2022): 359–372, https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.818.
Bunga, Marten et al., “Urgensi Peran Serta Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Law Reform 15, no. 1 (2019): 85-97, https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23356.
Bustamam, Amrullah. “Pidana Mati Bagi Koruptor Dana Bencana Non Alam: Studi Terhadap Konsekuensi Keputusan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2020,” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 9, no. 2 (2020): 260–280.
Butt, Simon and Fritz Edward Siregar, “State control over natural resources in Indonesia: implications of the oil and natural gas law case of 2012”, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 31, no. 2 (2013): 107-121.
Goodman, Brian. “The Dutch East India Company and the Tea Trade”, Emory Endeavors in World History 3 (2010): 60-68.
Hamzah, Herdiansyah. “Legal Policy of Legislation in the Field of Natural Resources in Indonesia”, Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 1 (2016): 108-121.
Hayyi, Muhammad Akram Syarif, Muhammad Said Karim, and Aminuddin Ilmar. "Urgensi Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule terhadap Direksi BUMN dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi." Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 1 (2021): 72-81.
Hosein, Zainal Arifin. “Peran negara dalam pengembangan sistem ekonomi kerakyatan menurut UUD 1945”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 23, no. 3 (2016): 503-528.
Indonesian Corruption Watch, “Kasus Korupsi di Lingkungan BUMN: Marak dan Rawan Pada Sektor Finansial”, Online, March 21 (2022). Retrieved from https://antikorupsi.org/id/kasus-korupsi-di-lingkungan-bumn-marak-dan-rawan-pada-sektor-finansial.
Iqbal, Moch. “Kriminalisasi Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terkait Bumn Persero,” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 2, no. 2 (2013): 309, https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.309-324.
Katimin, Herman. “Kerugian Keuangan Negara Atau Perekonomian Negara Dalam Menentukan Hukuman Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Sasi 26, no. 1 (2020): 39, https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i1.210.
Kristian Kristian. "Urgensi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 44, no. 4 (2014): 575-621.
Makhfud, M. “Urgensi Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor Dengan Pengabaian Penderitaan Yang Akan Diderita,” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 6, no. 3 (2019): 317–30, https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v6i3.13200.
Manuain, Orpa Ganefo. "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi." Thesis. (Semarang: Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 2005).
Maswandi, Maswandi, “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor dalam Perspektif Islam di Indonesia,” Jurnal Mercatoria 9, no. 1 (2016): 75–85.
Miftakhuddin, Miftakhuddin, “Historiografi Korupsi di Indonesia: Resensi Buku Korupsi dalam Silang Sejarah Indonesia”, Rihlah: Jurnal Sejarah dan Kebudayaan 7, no. 2 (2019): 168-172.
Mufti, Ahmad, Sophian Yahya Selajar, and Muhammad Tabrani Mutalib. "Pertanggungjawaban Pimpinan BUMN/BUMD Berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi." de Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 65-83.
Mufti, Ahmad, Sophian Yahya Selajar, and Muhammad Tabrani Mutalib, “Pertanggungjawaban Pimpinan BUMN/BUMD Berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 65-83, https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v1i1.1418.
Munasto, Daud. “Kebijakan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dikaji Dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum,” Widya Pranata Hukum 4, no. 1 (2022): 24–38.
Priambodo, Ervanda Rifqi, Miftahul Falah, and Yoga Pratama Silaban, “Mengapa korupsi sulit diberantas?” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 1, no. 1 (2020): 30-41.
Putra, Mas and Zenno Januarsyah, “Penerapan Asas Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Tindak Applying Principles of Ultimum Remedium Corruptions,” Wawasan Yuridika 1, no. 1 (2017): 24–34.
Putri, Kristina Dwi, and Agustianto Agustianto. "Efektifitas Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Para Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia." Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 4, no. 3 (2021): 736-747.
Rajagukguk, Erman. “Pengertian Keuangan Negara dan Kerugian Negara”, Paper, presented for Public Discussion and Seminar “Pengertian Keuangan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Komisi Hukum Nasional (KHN) RI, Jakarta 26 July 2006.
Saptono, Prianto Budi and Dwi Purwanto. "Factors causing the ineffectiveness of Good Corporate Governance in preventing Corruption in State-Owned Enterprises." Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 8, no. 1 (2022): 77-94.
Saputra, Rian and Silaas Oghenemaro Emovwodo, “Indonesia as Legal Welfare State: The Policy of Indonesian National Economic Law”, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 2, no. 1 (2022): 1-13.
Setiyawan, Deni. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor Pada Masa Pandemi,” Jurnal As-Said 1, no. 1 (2021): 5–9.
Susanto, Susanto, “Kedudukan Akuntan Publik Untuk Melakukan Audit Investigatif Terhadap Kekayaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Persero Dalam Rangka Menghitung,” Jurnal Hukum Staatrechts 1, no. 1 (2018): 57–86.
Timo, Ebenhaizer Nuban “Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor atau Hukum Koruptor Sampai Mati Sebuah Kajian Hukum, Etis Kristiani dan Kultural.” Jurnal Humaniora Yayasan Bina Darma IV, no. 1 (2017): 45–62.
Wotulo, Moses Janrry. "Analisis Yuridis atas Hukuman Mati terhadap Koruptor Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia." Lex Privatum 9, no. 13 (2021): 213-222.