DAMPAK PROGRAM PERKULIAHAN MEKANIKA BERBASIS MULTIPEL REPRESENTASI TERHADAP KECERDASAN SPASIAL MAHASISWA CALON GURU

Ismet -(1),


(1) Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia

Abstract

ABSTRAK
Telah dilakukan penelitian untuk menggali kompetensi mahasiswa dalam membangun beragam representasi dan melihat dampaknya terhadap kecerdasan spasial mahasiswa. Desain penelitian menggunakan Mixed Methods Research melalui embedded experimental model. Data kuantitatif dikumpulkan meggunakan instrumen tes kecerdasan spasial yang dikembangkan berdasarkan taksonomi kapasitas inti kecerdasan spasial, dan data kualitatif dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, analisis dokumen, angket. Hasil analisis kualitatif menunjukan bahwa representasi mahasiswa belum konsisten antara satu representasi dengan representasi lainnya, namun demikian kompetensi multipel representasi mahasiswa  dari waktu ke waktu meningkat semakin membaik mendekati representasi expert. Analisis kuantitatif menunjukkan bahwa  rerata N-gain kecerdasan spasial kelas eksperimen 0,52 (kriteria sedang) lebih tinggi dari kelas kontrol 0,16 (kriteria rendah) sehingga pembelajaran mekanika berbasis multipel representasi dapat meningkatkan kecerdasan spasial mahasiswa. Peningkatan kecerdasan spasial terjadi pada semua indikator kapasitas inti kecerdasan spasial. Berdasarkan perhitungan efek-size(d) dan rerata N-gain,  maka  peningkatan paling kuat terjadi pada indikator representasi grafik (d= 4,66, dan N-gain=0,65).

 

ABSTRACT
A study has been conducted to explore students' ability in constructing multiple representations and examine its impact on students' spatial intelligence. This study employed a mixed-method with embedded experimental design.  Quantitative data were collected using instruments of spatial intelligence test developed based on taxonomy of core capacities of spatial intelligence. Qualitative data were collected through interviews, document analysis, and questionnaires. Quantitative analysis showed that theinitialrepresentation ofthe studentshave not beenconsistentfrom one format representationtoanother. However, students' competencies of multiple representations were getting better and almost similar with expert’s representation.  Quantitativeanalysis showed that the averageN-gainof 0.52(medium category) of experimental class was higher than theN-gain of 0.16(low criterion) of control class, so that multiple representations-based mechanics  learning  can improve students’ spatial intelligence. The improvement of spatial intelligence occured in all indicators of the core capacities of spatial intelligence, with the strongest increase in the indicator of graphic representation (the average N-gain = 0.65 and  d-effect size = 4.66).

Keywords

multiple representations; mechanics; spatial intelligence

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ainsworth S., Prain V., and Tytler, R. 2011. Drawing to Learn in Science. Science.(333):1096-1097

Arends, R. I. 2008. Learning to Teach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Bao, L. 2006. Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. Am. J. Phys., 74 (10): 917- 922

Bektasli, B. 2006. The Relationships Between Spatial Ability, Logical Thinking, Mathematics Performance And Kinematics Graph Interpretation Skills Of 12th Grade Physics Students. Disertationtidak diterbitkan. Ohio: The Ohio State University

Bellanca, J. 2011. 200+Strategi dan Proyek Pembelajaran Aktif untuk Melibatkan Kecerdasan siswa (Edisi kedua). Jakarta: Indeks

Bryan, J. 2005. Physics activities for family math and science nights. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(2): 19-21

Ellis, P. D. 2010. The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Etkina, E., Warren, A.,& Gentile, M. 2006. “The role of models in physics instruction”. Phys. Teach. (44):34-39

Gardner, H. 1993. Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. NewYork: Basic Books.

Hake, R. R. 1998. Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys., 66 (1): 64-74

Lazear, D. 2004. Higher-Order Thinking the multiple Intelligences Way. Chicago: Zephyr Press.

Matlin, M.W. 2009. Cognitive Psychology (7th Ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

McDermott, L. C. 1990.‘‘Research and computer-based instruction: Opportunity for interaction,’’, Am. J. Phys. (58): 452–462.

Morgan, G. A., et al.2004. SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation 2nd edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Nasution, S.B. 2000. Kemampuan Siswa dalam Memahami Grafik tentang Konsep Kinematika Gerak Lurus.Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: SPSUPI

Presseisen, B.Z. 1985. “Thinking Skills: Meanings and Models”, dalam Developing Minds. A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. Alexandria: ASCD

Reif, Frederick. 1995. “Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes,’’ Am. J. Phys. (63): 17–32

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L., & Richard, H. 2011. The role of opportunity to learn in teacher preparation: an international context. Journal of Teacher Educatio. 62 (2): 138-153

Shaffer, P.S. & McDermott, L.C. 2005. “A Research-based Approach to Improving Student Understanding of The Vector Nature of Kinematical concepts”. Am. J. Phys. 73 (10): 921-931

Suhandi, A. dan Wibowo, F.C. 2012. Pendekatan Multirepresentasi Dalam Pembelajaran Usaha-Energi dan Dampak Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. (8): 1-7

Suparno, P. 2004. Teori inteligensi Ganda dan Aplikasinya. Yogyakarta; Kanisius.

Van Heuvelen, A. 2001. Millikan Lecture 1999: The workplace, Student Minds, and Physics Learning Systems. Am. J. Phys. 69(11):1139-1146

Waldrip, B., Prain,V., and Carolan, J. 2010. Using Multi-Modal Representationss to Improve Learning in Junior Secondary Science.Res Sci Educ.(40):65–80

Wiebe, Eric N. et al.2008. Improving Early Spatial Intelligence Through Science Notebook Graphic Production: Effective Elementary Classroom Practices. Conference on Research and Training in Spatial Intelligence, Evanston, IL

Yore, L.D. & Hand, B. 2010. Epilogue: Plotting a Research Agenda for Multiple Representations, Multiple Modality, and Multimodal Representational Competency. Springer Res Sci Educ (40):93–101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License