The Position of the Constitutional Court in the Sphere of Judicial Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ijpgc.v4i1.20518Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Judiciary, and Board PositionAbstract
This study aims to find and analyze the Herarki or the position of the Constitutional Court in the Scope of Judicial power. Where the decisions issued by the constitutional court are binding for all legal subjects and final, which means that the first and last decisions cannot be appealed. So this research is important to be researched from the history of the idea of the emergence of the constitutional court and its position in the scope of judicial power. In this study, the author will examine the position of the constitutional court based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia) and positive norms that are still in force today (ius contitutum). Based on this description, this study focuses on two problem formulations, namely first, how historically the constitutional court was formed as an institution within the scope of judicial power. Second, what is the position of the constitutional court within the scope of judicial power? This research is a normative research with the main research methods used are the statute approach, historical approach and conceptual approach. In this study, it is drawn from the history of the emergence of the Constitutional Court Institution and entered as one of the spheres of judicial power. Where in the judicial power there are 3 institutions including the Supreme Court Institution, the Judicial Commission Institution and the Constitutional Court Institution. The position in the institution is aligned with no higher or highest institution. Institutions within the scope of judicial power have the principle of check and balance and are independent.
References
Bobbitt, Philip. (1991). Constitutional interpretation. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
Darmadi, Nanang Sri. (2011). Kedudukan dan wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam sistem hukum ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 26(2), Agustus.
Fadjar, Abdul Mukhtie. (2016). Sejarah, elemen, dan tipe negara hukum. Malang: Setara Press.
Gusthomi, Moh. Imam. (2022). Kedudukan dan kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Jurnal Majelis MPR-RI: Hubungan Antar Lembaga Negara, Edisi 05, Desember. https://mail.mpr.go.id/jurnal/507/Jurnal-Majelis-Ed-5-2022:-Hubungan-Antar-Lembaga-Negara
Heun, Werner. (2011). The constitution of Germany: A contextual analysis. Portland: Hart Publishing.
Huda, Miftakhul. (2007). Ultra petita dalam pengujian undang-undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 4(3), September.
Johansyah. (2019). Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga negara berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. [Nama jurnal tidak dicantumkan], 17(2).
Limbach, Jutta. (2001). The concept of the supremacy of constitution. The Modern Law Review, 64(1).
Nugroho, W. E. (2014). Implementasi Trias Politica dalam sistem pemerintahan di Indonesia. Gema Keadilan, 1(1).
Ontong, Rosadi. (2004). Hukum tata negara Indonesia: Teori dan praktek. Padang: Tanpa Penerbit.
Putri, K. D. A., & Arifin, R. (2018). Tinjauan teoritis keadilan dan kepastian dalam hukum di Indonesia (The theoretical review of justice and legal certainty in Indonesia). MIMBAR YUSTITIA, 2(2).
R, Arifin, Rasdi, & Alkadri, R. (2018). Tinjauan atas permasalahan penegakan hukum dan pemenuhan hak dalam konteks universalisme dan relativisme hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 26(1).
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan hukum progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. (2012). Mendesain kewenangan kekuasaan kehakiman setelah perubahan UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), Desember.
Supomo. (1960). Sistim hukum di Indonesia sebelum Perang Dunia II. Cetakan keempat. Penerbit Noor Komala.
Tim Penyusun Naskah Komprehensif Proses dan Hasil Perubahan UUD 1945. (2010). Naskah komprehensif perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Buku VI kekuasaan kehakiman. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. (2009). Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Weiner, Greg. (2019). The political constitutional: The case against judicial supremacy. Kansas: The University Press of Kansas.
Wijayanto, Danang, dkk. (2018). Meluruskan arah manajemen kekuasaan kehakiman. Jakarta Pusat: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Yulistiowati, Efi. (2016). Penerapan konsep Trias Politica dalam pemerintahan Republik Indonesia: Studi komparatif atas Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 sebelum dan sesudah amandemen. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 18(2).
Sumber hukum
Konstitusi Amerika Serikat. (1787). Pasal VI.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). [Berita Mahkamah Konstitusi, ID 11766]. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=11766
Downloads
Published
Article ID
20518Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Moh. Imam Gusthomi, Anis Widyawati, Daud Renata Candra Ramadan, Zulfa Rena Wijayanti, Adiba Ro'uf Danur Islam (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
