Integrating Inquiry-Based Learning within the 5E-Framework: Implications for Preservice Science Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v6i1.34358Keywords:
5E-Framework, Conceptual Understanding, Critical Thinking, Density, Gender Difference, Inquiry-based learningAbstract
This study examines the effect of integrating inquiry-based learning within the 5E-Framework on enhancing conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills in the topic of density among pre-service teachers at Bagabaga College of Education, with attention to gender differences. Using a one-group pretest–posttest design, data were collected from Level 200 pre-service teachers (N = 52) and analyzed using SPSS. Results showed no statistically significant difference in normalized gain scores between males (mean NG = -0.045) and females (mean NG = -0.044); t(50) = 0.965, p > .05, indicating the model improved conceptual understanding similarly across genders. However, significant gender differences were found in critical thinking dimensions: analysis (p = .000, η² = .221) and logic (p = .005, η² = .129), while no significant difference was observed in the evaluation dimension (p = .444, η² = .010). These findings suggest that while integrating inquiry-based learning within the 5E-Framework is effective in supporting general learning gains in science concepts such as density, differences in specific cognitive skills remain. The study recommends incorporating targeted interventions to ensure more equitable development of critical thinking across genders in science education
References
Abdulazeez, B. T. A., Bolaji, H. O., & Bello, A. Z. (2024). Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Pedagogical Skills and Usability of Mobile Technology for Instructional Delivery During Teaching Practice. Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 12-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v4i1.3317
Açışlı, S., Yalçın, S. A., & Turgut, U. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2459-2462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.128
Adauyah, R., & Aznam, N. (2024). Guided inquiry learning model in chemistry education: A systematic review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 10(3), 77–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6373
Aliakbari, M., & Sadeghdaghighi, A. (2011). Investigation of the relationship between gender, field of study, and critical thinking skill: The case of Iranian students. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 301-310).
Al-Jasim, F. A., & Al-Hamdan, N. S. (2012). Critical thinking skills and their relationship with academic achievement and gender of 10th grade students in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 13(4), 13-16. https://journals.aisrp.net/index.php/jeps.
Appiah-Twumasi, E., Nti, D., Acheampong, R., & Eminah, C. (2021). Effect of the 5E instructional model on physics academic achievement based on gender and students’ ability: A case of Berekum Senior High Schools in Ghana. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2021v02i01.0060
Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
Azizi, M., Fallah-Zivlaee, S., Králik, R., & Miština, J. (2022). Gender and its role in critical thinking and critical thinking strategies used by EFL learners. Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío, 34(53), 45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.997
Bagher, F., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2016). Critical thinking and gender differences in academic self-regulation in higher education. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(3), 133-145. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/284
Bart, W., Hokason, B., Sahin, I., & Abdelsame, M. (2015). An investigation of the gender differences in creative thinking abilities among 8th and 11th grade students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 17-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.003
Duran, L. B., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. Science Education Review, 3(2), 49-58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492002.pdf
Gouvea, J. S., Sawtelle, V., Geller, B. D., & Turpen, C. (2013). A framework for analyzing interdisciplinary tasks: Implications for student learning and curricular design. Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 187-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-08-0135
Hwang, G. J., Chiu, L. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2015). A contextual game-based learning approach to improving students' inquiry-based learning performance in social studies courses. Computers & Education, 81, 13-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.006
Kurniashih, R., Syarifuddin, H., & Darmansyah, D. (2018). The influence of guided inquiry learning model on students' mathematical problem solving ability. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 178, 358-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.78
Liu, N. Y., Hsu, W. Y., Hung, C. A., Wu, P. L., & Pai, H. C. (2019). The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 89, 18–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005
Meidawati, Y. (2014). Influence of supervised instructional enquiry approach on mathematical problem solving ability of junior high school students. Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 1(2), 35-42. https://jett.um.ac.id/index.php/jett/article/view/20
Nicol, C., Gakuba, E., & Habinshuti, G. (2020). An overview of learning cycles in science inquiry-based instruction. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 16(2), 76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v16i2.5
Noor, F. M., Prasetyo, D. R., Salic-Hairulla, M.
A., Saputra, A., & Safira, T. I. D. (2025). Development of STEM-Based Learning Devices for Science Teachers Oriented on Students' Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v5i2.29788
Otero, I., Martínez, A., Cuadrado, D., Lado, M., Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2024). Sex differences in cognitive reflection: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 12(4), 2-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12040028
Ramadani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Fahrurrozi, M., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Analysis of students' critical thinking skills in terms of gender using science teaching materials based on the 5E learning cycle integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29387
Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E model of instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 2-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00339-4
Salahshoor, N., & Rafiee, M. (2016). The relationship between critical thinking and gender: A case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(2), 117-123. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/272
Saldo, I. J., & Walag, A. M. (2020). Utilizing problem-based and project-based learning in developing students’ communication and collaboration skills in physics. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 232-237. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/8/5/5/index.html
Shahzadi, U., & Khan, I. (2020). Exploring the relationship between critical thinking skills and academic achievement. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research, 3(1), 236-242. https://ojs.ssu.edu.pk/index.php/ssjesr/article/view/153
Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Critical thinking, creativity and gender differences for knowledge generation in education. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 10(1), 3086-3093. https://infonomics-society.org/wp-content/uploads/licej/published-papers/volume-10-2019
Sudria, I. B., Redhana, I. W., Kirna, I., & Aini, D. (2018). Effect of Kolb's Learning Styles under Inductive Guided-Inquiry Learning on Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 89-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1117a
Uum, M. S., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: scaffolding pupils’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461–2481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1373650
Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2012). Student difficulties in learning density: A distributed cognition perspective. Research in Science Education, 42, 769-789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9216-3
Zetriuslita, H. J., Ariawan, R., & Nufus, H. (2016). Students’ critical thinking ability: Description based on academic level and gender. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 154-164. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/30159
