The Use of Socio-Scientific Issues to Promote Prospective Biology Teachers’ Scientific Literacy and Research Skill Development

Authors

  • M Haviz Department of Biology Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia Author
  • Ervina Nasrul Department of Biology Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia Author
  • David Azis Department of Islamic Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia Author
  • Ika Metiza Maris Department of Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia Author
  • Farhan Wahyudi Department of Biology Education, Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/v7kbh850

Keywords:

socio-scientific issue, scientific literacy, research skill development, prospective biology teachers

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the use of SSI to promote prospective biology teachers’ scientific literacy and research skill development. This research uses quantitative methods with a true-experiment design. The treatments were Guided Inquiry (GI) and Research-based Learning (RbL) in two biology classes. This study involved 39 sixth-semester students, five males and 34 females. The lecturer applied the GI and RbL syntax at the 1-8th meetings to collect the data. At the 9-12th meeting, PBTs carried out guided work by studying articles containing themes or content of SSI from the scientific journal. Data analysis was carried out with descriptive statistics, and to differentiate between the two treatments, a test of equality of mean values was carried out using the t-test. This research provides several conclusions. First, SSI articles can be used as learning materials promoting scientific literacy and RSD-7. Second, using SSI with RbL and SSI with GI promotes prospective biology teachers’ scientific literacy. The SL components are explaining phenomena scientifically, evaluating and designing inquiry, interpreting data, and knowledge of scientific literacy. Third, using SSI with RbL and SSI with GI promotes prospective biology teachers’ RSD-7 skills at all levels: (1) Embark and Clarify, (2) Find and Generate, (3) Evaluate and Reflect, (4) Organize and Manage, (5) Analyze and Synthesize, and (6) Communicate and Apply. The seven levels in RSD-7 are prescribed research, bounded research, scaffolded research, self-initiated research, open research, adopted research, and enlarging research. There were no differences in RSD-7 skills between the SSI with RbL and GI treatments. Fourth, there is no difference in learning outcomes between the SSI with GI and RbL treatments.

References

Ain, C. T., Sabir, F., & Willison, J. (2019). Research skills that men and women developed at university and then used in workplaces. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2346–2358.

Ambrosino, C. M., & Rivera, M. A. J. (2022). Using ethological techniques and place-based pedagogy to develop science literacy in Hawaiʻi’s high school students. Journal of Biological Education, 56(1), 3–13.

Bandaranaike, S. (2018). From research skill development to work skill development. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 15(4), 1–20.

Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 269–290.

Borchardt, R., Salcedo, T., & Bentley, M. (2019). Little intervention, big results: intentional integration of information literacy into an introductory-level biology lab course. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 450–462.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed methods procedures. In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth edit). SAGE Publications, Inc. Los Angeles.

Downs, J. R. (1988). Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills (P. D. E. and D. P. Kauchak (ed.); Second edi). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1988. NASSP Bulletin, 72(508), 119-119.

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249.

Gertner, D., Xu, N., Porter-Morgan, H., & Brashears, J. (2023). Developing students’ scientific literacy through an e-portfolio project at a community college gateway science course. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1), 129–144.

Gyuris, E. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of postgraduate research skills training and its alignment with the research skill development framework. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 15(4), 1–16.

Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-based curricula. Science and Education, 28(6–7), 639–667.

Hanifha, S., Erna, M., Noer, A. M., & Talib, C. A. (2023). Socioscientific issue-based undergraduate student worksheets on scientific literacy and environmental awareness. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(4), 504–513.

Haviz, M. (2018). Development of research-based learning model in biology education: What is relevance, concystency and practicality? Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(1), 143–149.

Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I. A., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 355–363.

Haviz, M., Lufri, L., & Maris, I. M. (2020). Assessing prospective biology teachers (PBTs) perceptions on thinking as a 21st century skill: A case study at Islamic university. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 319–329.

Hiltunen, M., Kärkkäinen, S., & Keinonen, T. (2020). Biology student teachers’ dialogic talk in inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 54(3), 300–314.

Kang, J., Baker, R., Feng, Z., Na C., Granville, P., & Feldon, D. F. (2022). Detecting threshold concepts through Bayesian knowledge tracing: examining research skill development in biological sciences at the doctoral level. Instructional Science, 50, 475–497.

Kaur, P., Stotzfus, J., & Yellapu, V. (2018). Descriptive Statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine, 4(1), 60–63.

Kremer, K., Specht, C., Urhahne, D., & Mayer, J. (2014). The relationship in biology between the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Biological Education, 48(1), 1–8.

Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science and Education, 23(2), 285–302.

Lee, Y. C. (2007). Developing decision-making skills for socio-scientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 170–177.

Martín-Gámez, C., Acebal, M. del C., & Prieto, T. (2020). Developing the concept of ‘ecosystem’ through inquiry-based learning: a study of pre-service primary teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 54(2), 147–161.

Martineau, C., Traphagen, S., & Sparkes, T. C. (2013). A guided inquiry methodology to achieve authentic science in a large undergraduate biology course. Journal of Biological Education, 47(4), 240–245.

Mataniari, R., Willison, J., Hasibuan, M. H. E., Sulistiyo, U., & Dewi, F. (2020). Portraying students’ critical thinking skills through research skill development (RSD) framework: A case of a biology course in an Indonesian University. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 302–314.

Natale, C. C., Mello, P. S., Trivelato, S. L. F., Marzin-Janvier, P., & Manzoni-De-Almeida, D. (2021). Evidence of scientific literacy through hybrid and online biology inquiry-based learning activities. Higher Learning Research Communications, 11(0), 33–49.

OECD. (2018). PISA Assesment and analytical framework. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-development/PISA-D-Assessment-and-Analytical-Framework-Ebook.pdf.

Perez, Z. O., Minyamin, A. V, Bagsit, R. D., Gimena, G. B., Dionaldo, W. V, Padillo, E. S., Lovoie, O. G., & Cabello, C. A. (2022). Research capability of faculty members in higher education institution: Basis for research management plan. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(3), 6215–6226.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. (A. Rosin, Trans). the Viking Press.

Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle-Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). A Framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26–31.

Rolfe, V., & Adukwu, E. (2023). Bioscience laboratory practicals, projects and placements in a Covid-19 world. Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 668–677.

Sadler, T. D. (2005). Evolutionary theory as a guide to socioscientific decision-making. Journal of Biological Education, 39(2), 68–72.

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific Issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1-9). New York: Springer (pp. 355–369).

Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353–376.

Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: a multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622–1635.

Salybekova, N., Issayev, G., Abdrassulova, Z., Bostanova, A., Dairabaev, R., & Erdenov, M. (2021). Pupils’ research skills development through project-based learning in biology. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 1106–1121.

Seixas Mello, P., Cotta Natale, C., Marzin-Janvier, P., Vieira, L. Q., & Manzoni-de-Almeida, D. (2023). Inquiry-based learning in immunology: analysis of scientific argument construction by undergraduate students in biological science and health care classes. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1), 68–82.

Silveira, L. F., Xavier, C. S., Perez, M. A., Bozza, D. A., Furtado-Alle, L., Hass, I., & Tureck, L. V. (2023). Unravelling the central dogma of biology in an active way: a case study. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1), 101–114.

Smith, K. P. W., Waddell, E. A., Dean, A. N., Anandan, S., Gurney, S., Kabnick, K., Little, J., McDonald, M., Mohan, J., Marenda, D. R., & Stanford, J. S. (2023). Course-based undergraduate research experiences are a viable approach to increase access to research experiences in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 618–632.

Snapir, Z., Karadi, G., & Zion, M. (2023). Inquiry practices and types of knowledge, with paths of logical associations between inquiry questions, presented as part of an open inquiry process. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 1062–1082.

Subiantoro, A. W., & Treagust, D. F. (2021). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing high-school students’ perceptions of socio-scientific issues-based learning in biology. Learning Environments Research, 24(2), 223–237.

Suwono, H., Permana, T., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2023a). The problem-based learning (PBL) of biology for promoting health literacy in secondary school students. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1), 230–244.

Suwono, H., Rofi’ah, N. L., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2023b). Interactive socio-scientific inquiry for promoting scientific literacy, enhancing biological knowledge, and developing critical thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 944–959.

Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: from the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61.

Toutenburg, H. S. (2009). Comparison of two samples. In: Statistical analysis of designed experiments (Third Edit). Springer Newyork.

Tsunekage, T., Bishop, C. R., Long, C. M., & Levin, I. I. (2020). Integrating information literacy training into an inquiry-based introductory biology laboratory. Journal of Biological Education, 54(4), 396–403.

Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680.

Wildan, A., Yau, C. D., Ng, E. M. W., Xiao, K., Liew, O. W., & Ng, T. W. (2022). Algae photosynthesis and respiration experimentation with physical and augmented reality modes. Journal of Biological Education, 56(2), 163–173.

Willison, J., & Buisman-Pijlman, F. (2016). PhD prepared: research skill development across the undergraduate years. International Journal for Researcher Development, 7(1), 63–83.

Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 393–409.

Willison, J., O’Regan, K., & Kuhn, S. (2018). Researcher skill development framework (US English Edition). Open Educational Resources, 6.

Willison, J. W. (2012). When academics integrate research skill development in the curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 905–919.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-26

Article ID

1505

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Haviz, M., Nasrul, E., Azis, D., Maris, I. M., & Wahyudi, F. (2024). The Use of Socio-Scientific Issues to Promote Prospective Biology Teachers’ Scientific Literacy and Research Skill Development. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/v7kbh850