Physics Education Students' Views about Force Diagrams while Solving Physics Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i2.21457Keywords:
force, force diagrams, physics problems, representations, viewsAbstract
Force is one of the most fundamental concepts in physics, used to describe and explain a wide range of phenomena. Students can use force diagrams to learn about fundamental force concepts and solve problems related to forces. However, a limited study has focused on students’ views in drawing force diagrams. This study aims to explore students’ views about force diagrams while solving physics problems. A qualitative study was conducted to explore students’ views on drawing and using force diagrams when solving force problems, involving 18 physics education students. Before the semi-structured interviews were conducted, the students were given two force problems to solve. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for analysis. Data from the interview was analyzed using NVivo software. This study identified five themes related to students’ views on force diagrams: purposes, conventions, physics concepts, mathematical concepts, and incomplete diagrams. The most frequently mentioned theme by students was the purpose of drawing force diagrams. Students’ knowledge about force concepts and trigonometry also affected their diagrams. Students had different ways to draw diagrams, either on the dot or on the object, and had reasons for drawing the incomplete force diagrams. These findings suggest that students should possess sufficient knowledge of physics and mathematics to draw force diagrams effectively. Students should also understand when force diagrams are applicable and recognize the advantages of drawing them. This study suggests that to support students' effective understanding of force diagrams, educators should employ appropriate strategies and equip students with the skills to create and utilize force diagrams while learning about force concepts and solving problems.
References
Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389–421.
Arons, A. B. (1997). Teaching introductory physics. Wiley.
Aviani, I., Erceg, N., & Mešić, V. (2015). Drawing and using free body diagrams: Why it may be better not to decompose forces. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–14.
Balta, N., & Asikainen, M. A. (2019). A comparison of Olympians’ and regular students’ approaches and successes in solving counterintuitive dynamics problems. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1644-1666.
Balta, N., & Eryılmaz, A. (2017). Counterintuitive Dynamics Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 411-431.
Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2014). Test of understanding of vectors: A reliable multiple-choice vector concept test. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 010121.
Blue, J. (2018). Assessing astronomy students’ views about the nature of scientific inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10141.
Bollen, L., Van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–17.
Burkholder, E. W., Murillo-Gonzalez, G., & Wieman, C. (2021). Importance of math prerequisites for performance in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 10108.
Chen, Z., Demirci, N., Choi, Y. J., & Pritchard, D. E. (2017). To draw or not to draw? Examining the necessity of problem diagrams using massive open online course experiments. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 1–12.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (Eighth). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design (Fifth). SAGE Publications.
Etkina, E., Gitomer, D., Iaconangelo, C., Phelps, G., Seeley, L., & Vokos, S. (2018). Design of an assessment to probe teachers’ content knowledge for teaching: An example from energy in high school physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10127.
Etkina, Planinsic, & Van Heuvelen. (2019). A College Physics: Explore and Apply (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Giambattista, A., Richardson, B. M., & Richardson, R. C. (2004). College Physics, Volume One. McGraw-Hill.
Giancoli, D. C. (2014). Physics Principles with Applications Volume 1. Pearson.
Gyllenpalm, J., Rundgren, C. J., Lederman, J., & Lederman, N. (2022). Views About Scientific Inquiry: A Study of Students’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry in Grade 7 and 12 in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(2), 336–354.
Hamdani, H., Mursyid, S., & Sirait, J. (2019). Using physics representation worksheet to enhance students’ understanding and performance about force. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 032013.
Heckler, A. F., & Scaife, T. M. (2015). Adding and subtracting vectors: The problem with the arrow representation. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(1), 1–17.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158.
Hung, C. S., & Wu, H. K. (2018). Tenth graders’ problem-solving performance, self-efficacy, and perceptions of physics problems with different representational formats. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 20114.
Kalyuga, S., & Singh, A. M. (2016). Rethinking the Boundaries of Cognitive Load Theory in Complex Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 831–852.
Kaur, D., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Development of Physics Attitude Scale (PAS): An Instrument to Measure Students’ Attitudes Toward Physics. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(5), 291–304.
Klein, P., Müller, A., & Kuhn, J. (2017). Assessment of representational competence in kinematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010132.
Kohnle, A., Ainsworth, S. E., & Passante, G. (2020). Sketching to support visual learning with interactive tutorials. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 20139.
Küchemann, S., Malone, S., Edelsbrunner, P., Lichtenberger, A., Stern, E., Schumacher, R., Brünken, R., Vaterlaus, A., & Kuhn, J. (2021). Inventory for the assessment of representational competence of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 20126.
Kuo, E., Hallinen, N. R., & Conlin, L. D. (2017). When procedures discourage insight: epistemological consequences of prompting novice physics students to construct force diagrams. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 814–839.
Lee, A. (2017). Helping Students Draw Correct Free-Body Diagrams. The Physics Teacher, 55(8), 485–487.
Lin, S.-Y., & Singh, C. (2015). Effect of scaffolding on helping introductory physics students solve quantitative problems involving strong alternative conceptions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 020105.
Lucas, L. L., & Lewis, E. B. (2019). High school students’ use of representations in physics problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 119(6), 327–339.
Maloney, D. P. (1990). Forces as interactions. The Physics Teacher, 28(6), 386–390.
Mattson, M. (2004). Getting Students to Provide Direction When Drawing Free-Body Diagrams. The Physics Teacher, 42(7), 398–399.
McPadden, D., & Brewe, E. (2017). Impact of the second semester University Modeling Instruction course on students’ representation choices. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020129.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (Fourth). John Wiley and Sons.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Source Book (Fourth Edition). SAGE Publications.
Nie, Y., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J. C., Liu, Q., Han, J., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2019). Teaching towards knowledge integration in learning force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2271-2295.
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri, J. (2010). Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students’ representational consistency. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020109.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (Fourth). SAGE Publications.
Phelps, G., Gitomer, D. H., Iaconangelo, C. J., Etkina, E., Seeley, L., & Vokos, S. (2020). Developing Assessments of Content Knowledge for Teaching Using Evidence-centered Design. Educational Assessment, 25(2), 91–111.
Redish, E. F. (2021). Using Math in Physics: Overview. The Physics Teacher, 59(5), 314–318.
Robertson, A. D., Goodhew, L. M., Scherr, R. E., & Heron, P. R. L. (2021). University student conceptual resources for understanding forces. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 010121.
Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2009). Do students use and understand free-body diagrams? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1), 1–13.
Saldana, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Third). SAGE Publications.
Savinainen, A., Mäkynen, A., Nieminen, P., & Viiri, J. (2013). Does using a visual-representation tool foster students’ ability to identify forces and construct free-body diagrams? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9(1), 1–11.
Scheid, J., Müller, A., Hettmannsperger, R., & Schnotz, W. (2019). Improving learners’ representational coherence ability with experiment-related representational activity tasks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010142.
Schiering, D., Sorge, S., Keller, M. M., & Neumann, K. (2022). A proficiency model for pre‐service physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)—What constitutes high‐level PCK? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(1), 136–143.
Sirait, J., Ricky, P., & Hamdani, H. (2023). Development and Validation of the Force Diagrams Representation Test. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 183-196.
Sirait, J., Ainley, J., & Barstow, M. (2023). The pattern of physics education students’ diagrams and answers in solving force problems. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(2), 178–186.
Sirait, J., Hamdani, H., & Mursyid, S. (2019). The relationship between students’ views and performance of solving physics problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1171(1), 012008.
Sirait, J., Hamdani, & Mursyid, S. (2018). Students’ understanding of forces: Force diagrams on horizontal and inclined plane. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 012030.
Sirait, J., Firdaus, F., Hidayatullah, M. M. S., & Habellia, R. C. (2023). Development and Validation of Force Test to Assess Physics Education Students’ Representational Competence. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia. 11(2), 306–317.
Sirait, J. (2020). Students’ Use of Representations in Solving Physics Problems: Complete and Incomplete Force Diagrams [University of Leicester].
Sirait, J. (2021). Multirepresentasi Dalam Penyelesaian Soal Fisika. Fahruna Bahagia.
Sirait, J. (2023). Development and Validation of Physics Learning Motivation Survey (PLMS) using Rasch Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 4063–4069.
Stadermann, H. K. E., & Goedhart, M. J. (2020). Secondary school students’ views of nature of science in quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 997–1016.
Svensson, K., & Campos, E. (2022). Comparison of two semiotic perspectives: How do students use representations in physics? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 1–15.
Tay, S. L., & Yeo, J. (2018). Analysis of a physics teacher’s pedagogical ‘micro-actions’ that support 17-year-olds’ learning of free body diagrams via a modelling approach. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 109–138.
Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338–352.
Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725–746.
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., Flipse, S., & de Vries, M. J. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about improving transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics in senior pre-university education. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 587–604.
Tytler, R., Prain, V., Aranda, G., Ferguson, J., & Gorur, R. (2020). Drawing to reason and learn in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 209–231.
Vignal, M., & Wilcox, B. R. (2022). Investigating unprompted and prompted diagrams generated by physics majors during problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010104.
Wendel, P. (2011). Adding Value to Force Diagrams: Representing Relative Force Magnitudes. The Physics Teacher, 49(5), 308–311.
Woitkowski, D., & Wurmbach, N. L. (2019). Assessing German professors’ views of nature of science. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 10108.
