The Analysis of the Problems Solving Pattern on Wave Concept of the Physics Teachers’ Candidate

S Sarwi(1), S E Nugroho(2),


(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find the pattern of problem-solving of the wave concept. Qualitative research methods have been used. Think-aloud methods, essay tests, and interviews were used in data collection. Data analysis used qualitative analysis techniques. The results of the pattern of wave problem-solving by prospective teachers are formula-based methods, followed by P-prim and a small amount using analytical thinking. Difficulties in the effect of phase changes on the shape and value of displacement, and the propagation of string waves on the stationary wave of the Meld’s experiment. From the analysis, it is necessary to learn multi-representation of the concept of waves based on the type of problem-solving pattern was used. The benefits of research as input for monitoring the curriculum of the study program and increasing the interaction of wave physics learning.

Keywords

problem solving pattern, wave concept, physics teachers’ candidate

Full Text:

PDF

References

Asikainen, M.A. & Hirvonen, P.E. (2014). Probing Pre- and In-service Physics Teachers’ Knowledge Using the Double-Slit Thought Experiment. Sci & Educ 23, 1811–1833 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9710-1

Bahtiyar, A. & Can, B. (2016). An-Investigation of Problem Solving Skill of Pre-Service Science Teacher. Educational Research and Review, 11(23) 2108-2115

Bing, T.J. (2008). An Epistemic Framing Analysis of Upper Level Physics Students’ Use of Mathematics. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy’s Dissertation, Maryland University, College Park

Bonk, C.J., & Wiley, D.A. (2020). Preface: Reflections on the waves of emerging learning technologies. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 1595–1612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09809-x

Çalik, M., Okur, M., & Taylor, N. (2011). A Comparison of Different Conceptual Change Pedagogies Employed Within the Topic of “Sound Propagation.” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(6), 729-742. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9266-z

Calık, M., Kolomuc¸ A. & Karagolge Z (2010). The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students’ conceptions of rate of reaction. J Sci Educ Technol, 19:422–433

Creswell, J.W. & Clark, V.L.P. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Singapore: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Ertmer, P.A. Stepich, D.A. Flanagan, S. Karoglu, A.K. Reiner, C. Reyes,L., Santone, A. & Ushigusa, S. (2009). Impact of Guidance on the Problem-Solving Efforts of Instructional Design Novices. Performances Improvement Quarterly, 21(4), 117-132.

Erduran, S. & Kaya, E. (2018). Drawing Nature of Science in Pre-service Science Teacher Education: Epistemic Insight Through Visual Representations. Res. Sci. Educ. 48, 1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9773-0

Evagorou, M., Erduran, S. & Mantyla, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices: from conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to seeing how science works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(11):1-13; DOI 10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x

Fakcharoenphol, W., Morphew, J.W. & Mestre, J.P. (2015). Judgments of physics problem difficulty among experts and novices. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020128, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020128

Goh, P. S. C. & Yusuf, Q. (2017). Validation of the Malaysian Version of the Teacher Education Program Coherence Questionnaires. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(12), 42-59

Huang, R., Spector, J.M. & Yang, J. (2019). Educational Technology, A Primer for the 21st Century. Singapure: Springer Nature Singapore.

Johnson, E.K. (2019). Waves: Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning to Teach Science in a Whole-Body Educational Game. J Sci Educ Technol 28, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9753-1

Krell, M., Reinisch, B., & Krüger, D. (2014). Analyzing Students’ Understanding of Models and Modeling Referring to the Disciplines Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 367–393. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9427-9

Milbourne, J., & Wiebe, E. (2018).The Role of Content Knowledge in Ill-Structured Problem Solving for High School Physics Students. Res Sci Educ 48, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9564-4

Murphy, P.K., Alexander, P.A., Greene, J.A. & Hennessey, M.N. (2012). Examining epistemic frames in conceptual change research: implications for learning and instruction. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., 13: 475-486; DOI 10.1007/s12564-011-9199-0

Murphy, P.K., Firetto, C.M. & Greene, J.A. (2017). Enriching Students’ Scientific Thinking Through Relational Reasoning: Seeking Evidence in Texts, Tasks, and Talk. Educ Psychol Rev 29, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9387-x

Morphew, J.W. (2021). Changes in metacognitive monitoring accuracy in an introductory physics course. Metacognition Learning 16, 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09239-3

Mohan, P.P., Lingam, G.I. & Chand, D.D. (2017). Teachers' Perceptions of the Impact of Professional Development on Learning and Teaching in a Developing Nation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 17-33.

Nugroho, S.E. (2010). Epistemological Analysis of Electricity and Magnetism Concepts on Students of Physics Teacher Candidates. Dissertation ( unpublished), Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Pejuan, A., Bohigas, X., Jae ́n, X. & Periago, C. (2012). Misconceptions About Sound Among Engineering Students. J Sci Educ. Technol., 21:669–685. DOI 10.1007/s10956-011-9356-6

Park, M. (2020). Students’ problem-solving strategies in qualitative physics questions in a simulation-based formative assessment. Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0019-4

Robinson, F.J., Reeves, P.M., Caines, H.L. & Claudia De Grandi, C. (2020). Using Open-Source Videos to Flip a First-Year College Physics Class. J Sci Educ Technol 29, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09814-y

Rogiers, A., Merchie, E. & Van Keer, H. (2020). What they say is what they do? Comparing task-specific self-reports, think-aloud protocols, and study traces for measuring secondary school students’ text-learning strategies. Eur J Psychol Educ 35, 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00429-5

Sarwi, S., Supardi, K.I. & Linuwih, S. (2017). Physics Structure Analysis of Parallel Waves Concept of Physics Teacher Candidate. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 824,012011, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012011

Sarwi, S., Hidayah, N. & Yulianto, A. (2018). Guided inquiry learning model to improve the conceptual understanding and scientific work skills of high school students in Central Java. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1170, 012083; doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012083

Virtanen, P., Niemi, H.M. & Nevgi, A. (2017). Active Learning and Self-Regulation Enhance Student Teachers' Professional Competences. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(12), 1-22

Wolff, C.E., van de Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H. & Boshuizen, H.P.A. (2015). Keeping an Eye on Learning: Differences Between Expert and Novice Teacher's Representations of Classroom Management Events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 68-85. https://doi:10.1177/0022487114549810

Wang, CY. (2021). Differences in perception, understanding, and responsiveness of product design between experts and students: an early event-related potentials study. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09592-z

Yoon, JS., Boutis, K., Pecaric, M.R., Fefferman, N.R., Ericsson, K.A. & Pusic, M.V. (2020). A think-aloud study to inform the design of radiograph interpretation practice. Adv in Health Sci Educ 25, 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09963-0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License