Comparative Study of Secondary School Students' and Pre-Service Teachers' Misconception about Simple Electric Circuit

A. Suryadi, S. Kusairi, D. A. Husna

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to compare the misconceptions of secondary school students (junior and senior high school) and pre-service physics teachers about simple electrical circuits.  The study involved 92 people consisting of 30 junior high school students, 32 senior high school students, and 30 pre-service physics teachers. The diagnostic misconception instrument was adapted from the Simple Electric Circuits Diagnostic Test (SECDT). Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential analysis. The results of the study indicated that there are 11 misconceptions types that the student had. The clashing current is a type of misconception that is most often found both in high school students and in pre-service teacher. The inferential test showed that there were significant differences of misconception scores among junior high school students, senior high school students, and pre-service physics teachers (KW=12,689, df=2, p< 0.05). Teachers could use the misconception profile as a consideration in planning classroom instruction.


Keywords


electrical circuits, junior high school students, misconceptions, pre-service physics teachers, senior high school students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afra, N. C., Osta, I., & Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students' Alternative Conceptions about Electricity and Effect of Inquiry-Based Teaching Strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9106-7

Akınoğlu, O., & Karsantık, Y. (2016). Pre-Service Teachers' Opinions on Teaching Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.925a

Bayraktar, S. (2009). Misconceptions of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers about Force and Motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9120-9

Bilal, E., & Erol, M. (2009). Investigating Students' Conceptions of Some Electricity Concepts. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ, 3(2), 9.

Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2011). Development of a three-tier test to assess high school students' understanding of acids and bases. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 600–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.147

Chu, H.-E., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2008). Naïve Students' Conceptual Development and Beliefs: The Need for Multiple Analyses to Determine what Con-tributes to Student Success in a University Introductory Physics Course. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9068-3

Dilber, R. (2012). The effects of analogy on stu-dents' understanding of direct current cir-cuits and attitudes towards physics les-sons. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.3.211

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Eshach, H., Lin, T.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Mis-conception of sound and conceptual change: A cross-sectional study on stu-dents' materialistic thinking of sound. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 664–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21435

Fadaei, A. S., & Mora, C. (2015). An Investigation About Misconceptions in Force and Motion in High School. US-China Education Review A, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.01.004

Faisal, & Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: Past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0

Hermita, N., Isjoni, -, Suhandi, A., Syaodih, E., Samsudin, A., Rochman, C., & Rosa, F. (2018). Investigating Prospective Preservice Teacher's Misconceptions of Direct Current Electric Circuits. Proceedings of the First Indonesian Communication Forum of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Leaders International Conference on Education 2017 (ICE 2017). First Indo-nesian Communication Forum of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Leaders International Conference on Education 2017 (ICE 2017), Palu, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/ice-17.2018.78

Hussain, N. H., Latiff, L. A., & Yahaya, N. (2012). Alternative Conception about Open and Short Circuit Concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.678

Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., Samsudin, M. A., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2015). Publication Trends In Physics Education: A Bibliometric Study. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.801889

Kaltakçi, D., & Didiş, N. (2007). Identification of Pre-Service Physics Teachers' Misconceptions on Gravity Concept: A Study with a 3-Tier Misconception Test. AIP Conference Proceedings, 899, 499–500. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2733255

Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2017). Secondary School Students' Misconceptions about Simple Electric Circuits. 4(1), 15.

Lee, Y., & Law, N. (2001). Explorations in promot-ing conceptual change in electrical con-cepts via ontological category shift. Inter-national Journal Of Science Education, 23(2), 111–149.

Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Foisy, L.-M. B. (2014). Differences in Brain Activation Between Novices and Experts in Science During a Task Involving a Common Mis-conception in Electricity: Brain Activation Related to Scientific Expertise. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12043

Moodley, K., & Gaigher, E. (2017). Teaching Elec-tric Circuits: Teachers' Perceptions and Learners' Misconceptions. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9615-5

Morgan, G. A. (Ed.). (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The es-sential factor for conceptual change in lim-ited or inappropriate propositional hierar-chies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032

OECD (Ed.). (2008). OECD glossary of statistical terms. OECD.

Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconcep-tions About Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

Putri, S. M. Z., Cari, C., & Sunarno, W. (2019). Analysis of Analytical Thinking and Mis-conceptions on the Concepts of Heat and Temperature on Physics Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233, 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012031

Sencar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediat-ing the effect of gender on ninth-grade Turkish students' misconceptions concern-ing electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20016

Setyani, N., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Handhika, J. (2017). Students conception and perception of simple electrical circuit. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909, 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012051

Sree Harsha, N. R., Sreedevi, A., & Prakash, A. (2015). An unsolved electric circuit: A common misconception. Physics Educa-tion, 50(5), 568–572. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/50/5/568

Syuhendri, S. (2019). Student teachers' miscon-ceptions about gravity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185, 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012047

Turgut, Ü., Gürbüz, F., & Turgut, G. (2011). An investigation 10th grade students' miscon-ceptions about electric current. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1965–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.036

Wijaya, C. P. (2016). The Diagnosis of Senior High School Class X MIA B Students Miscon-ceptions About Hydrostatic Pressure Con-cept Using Three-Tier. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5784




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i2.21909

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licensep-ISSN 1693-1246 e-ISSN 2355-3812