SCIENCE LITERACY INDICATORS IN OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS OF HIGHSCHOOL PHYSICS TEXTBOOKS CHAPTER

A. Rokhmah(1), W. Sunarno(2), M. Masykuri(3),


(1) Fakultas Pendidikan, Pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS), Surakarta
(2) Fakultas Pendidikan, Pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS), Surakarta
(3) Fakultas Pendidikan, Pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS), Surakarta

Abstract

The direction of current science is emphasized on the importance of science literacy skill as a preparation for students returning to community after finishing school. Science literacy skill is believed can help the individuals to solve the problem scientifically and accountable. Science textbooks are instructional tools that help students learning science. The purpose of this research is to analyse the textbooks of Physics for high school grade X about Optical Instruments topic based on science literacy indicator. The study conducted in four senior highschools. There were two textbooks used in those schools, Book A and Book B. The results showed that on average the emergence of science literacy indicator of science nomenclature was 17.5%, intellectual process skills was 45.5%, the rules of scientific evidence was 8.5%, postulate of science was 19%, and scientific disposition was 9.5%. Book A contained of more research activities than Book B, but Book B linked the second indicator more comprehensive. The advantages and disadvantages of each analyzed textbooks can be used as a further background study for developing the good quality teaching material of physics-based scientific literacy.

Keywords

optical instruments; science literacy; textbooks

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agnes, D., Kaniawati, I., & Danawan, A. (2015). Analisis Deskriptif Tes Tiga Tingkat Materi Optika Geometri dan Alat Optik. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015. Bandung: Prodi Magister Pengajaran Fisika, FMIPA, ITB.

Arief, M. K., Utari, S. (2015). Implementation of Levels of Inquiry on Science Learning to Improve Junior High School Student’s Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11 (2), 117-125.

Bybee, R. W. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 566-585.

Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of Five High School Biology Textbooks Used in Uneted States for Inclusion of the Nature of Sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (15), 1847-1868.

Etkina, E., Heuvelen, A. V., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., Rosengrant, D., Warren, A. (2006). Scientific Abilities and Their Assessment. Physics Education Research, 2, 020103.

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A., Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a Measure of Scientific Literacy for Middle School Students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580.

Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 364-377.

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.

Hurd, P. D. (1997). Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing World. Science Education, 82, 407-416.

Karelina, A. & Etkina, E. (2007). Acting like a physicist: Student approach study to experimental design. Physics Education Research, 3, 020106.

Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810 –824.

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474 –496.

Morris, B. J., Masnick, A. M., Baker, K., Junglen, A. (2015). An Analysis of Data Activities and Instructional Supports in Middle School Science Textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 37 (16), 2708-2720.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Develepment. (2016). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf

Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., Susilowati, S. M. E. (2016). Development of Science TextBook Based on Scientific Literacy For Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 12 (2), 98-105.

Suniati, N. M. S., Sadia, W., Suhandana, A. (2013). Pengaruh Implementasi Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbantuan Multimedia Interaktif Terhadap Penurunan Miskonsepsi. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4.

Wenning, C. J. (2006). A framework for teaching the nature of science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education, 3(3).

Wenning, C. J. (2007). Assessing Inquiry Skills as Component of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education, 4(2), 21-24.

Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172 – 223.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License