Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Kreano, Creative-Innovative Mathematics Journal publish research issues on mathematics education. Author can be lecture, teacher, reseacher, and even student. The reserach approach is not allowed from study of theory. We recommend classroom action research, qualitative, descriptif, or quantitative. We may process manuscript of didactic development research (DDR) or research and development (RnD).

Our publication could be research on teaching method, experiment of teaching aid or media, and even effectifeness of lesson study. We accepted any manuscript derived from research of mathematics education. We wont process manuscript from research approcach of school management.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

The editorial section special to publish erratum corrigendum of an article.

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards Transport Policy and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. 

Initial manuscript evaluation The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review. 

Type of Peer Review Transport Policy employs double blind reviewing, where both the referee and author remain anonymous throughout the process. 

How the referee is selected Whenever possible, referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated. 

Referee reports Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work.

Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript. 

How long does the review process take? The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees. Should the referee’s reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. In rare cases for which it is extremely difficult to find a second referee to review the manuscript, or when the one referee’s report has thoroughly convinced the Editor, decisions at this stage to accept, reject or ask the author for a revision are made on the basis of only one referee’s report. The Editor’s decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the referees, which usually includes verbatim comments by the referees. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial referees who may then request another revision of a manuscript. 

Final report A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees. 

Editor’s Decision is final Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

Becoming a referee for Transport Policy If you are not currently a referee for Transport Policy but would like to be considered as a referee, please contact the editor. The benefits of refereeing for Transport Policy include the opportunity to read see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and to contribute to the overall integrity of scientific research and its published documentation. You may also be able to cite your work for Transport Policy as part of your professional development requirements for various Professional Societies and Organisations.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

About Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif

Aim and Scope

Kreano, Creative-Innovative Mathematics Journal publish research issues on mathematics education. Author can be lecture, teacher, reseacher, and even student. The reserach approach is not allowed from study of theory. We recommend classroom action research, qualitative, descriptif, or quantitative. We may process manuscript of didactic development research (DDR) or research and development (RnD).

Our publication could be research on teaching method, experiment of teaching aid or media, and even effectifeness of lesson study. We accepted any manuscript derived from research of mathematics education. We wont process manuscript from research approcach of school management.

History of Kreano

Kreano, Creative-Innovative Mathematics Journal, was first published in 2010. In first two years publication, Kreano published both mathematics-education and mathematics-science articles. 2013, the editor decide that Kreano would only published article of mathematics-education. In the year, the editor start to manage Kreano in online and open-acces with Open-Acces Journal System (OJS). The editor also increase the number of pages in one volume, from only 100 pages to minimum 200 pages. By the system, we could publish 20-26 articles in one volume (1 year).

2015 is the acceleration of internal management of Kreano. We start think that index and acreditation is important. On January, we started to apply Kreano into foreign index organisation, like DOAJ, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, EBSCO, Proquest, and CrossRef. We knew the result by the end of 2015.

On January-February 2016, we start to process the National Acreditation, and our target for 2017 is indexed on SCOPUS.