Dispute Resolution in Business Sector: Comparing Indonesia and Singapore Arbitration Model

Kelvin Leong Chun Fai; Prasasti Dyah Nugraheni

doi:10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.30262

Dispute Resolution in Business Sector: Comparing Indonesia and Singapore Arbitration Model

Kelvin Leong Chun Fai⁽¹⁾, Prasasti Dyah Nugraheni⁽²⁾,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.30262

(1) Brickfields Asia College
(2) Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Dispute resolution within the business sector can be accomplished through either national arbitration institutions or international arbitration institutions. International arbitration serves as a process to settle civil disputes using a neutral third party, particularly in the context of business-related conflicts arising between parties engaged in international business agreements. Such arbitration is often specified through arbitration clauses included in these international business agreements, which are mutually agreed upon by the involved parties. One example of an international arbitration institution that specializes in resolving civil disputes, particularly those within the business sector, is the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC) located in Singapore. The implementation of arbitration awards depends on the type of arbitration being conducted, whether it is a national arbitration award or an international arbitration award. During the preparation of this paper, the author utilized a normative-juridical research method, which involves relying on legal library sources and secondary legal materials to address existing legal issues. This paper aims to compare the legal foundations and the arbitration dispute resolution processes employed by the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) and the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC). The research findings reveal that the legal basis for arbitration dispute resolution utilized by the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) differs from that employed by the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC). Nevertheless, the processes and procedures for resolving arbitration disputes conducted by both institutions demonstrate notable similarities.

Keywords

Indonesia; Legal Basis for Arbitration Process; Singapore

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adolf, Huala. “Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Tentang Arbitrase Internasional”. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, No. 2 (2016): 317–334. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.684

Arsenius, Arsenius. “Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Keputusan Arbitrase Asing Menurut Keppres No 34 Tahun 1981 tentang Ratifikasi Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 di Negara Indonesia,” Jurnal Varia Bina Civika, No. 75 (2009).

Choong, John, Mark Mangan, and Nicholas Lingard. A Guide to the SIAC Arbitration Rules. (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2015).

Entriani, Anik. “Arbitrase dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia,” An-Nisbah: Jurnal Perbankan Syariah Indonesia 3, No. 2 (2017): 240-254. https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2017.3.2.277-293

Geraldi, Aldo Rico. “Kompetensi Arbitrase Internasional dan Pengadilan Nasional Terkait Penyelesaian Sengketa Penanaman Modal Asing,” Jurnal Humani 3, No. 2 (2017): 149–162.

Hornick, Robert N. “Indonesian Arbitration in Theory and Practice.” American Journal of Comparative Law 3 (1991): 559-597. https://doi.org/10.2307/840770

Israhadi, Evita Isretno. “A Study of Commercial Arbitration and the Autonomy of the Indonesian Arbitration Law.” Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Isses 21, No. 1 (2018).

Ivan, Randang S. “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Peranan Identitas Domisili dalam Menentukan Kompetensi Relatif Pengadilan,” Lex Privatum 4, No. 1 (2016): 24–32.

Karma, I Putu Wisnu, and I Ketut Artadi. “Arbitrase Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan dalam Sengketa Hak Kekayaan Intelektual”, Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum 7, No. 1 (2018): 1-14.

Kurniati, Grasia. “Studi Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis dan Implementasinya Antara Lembaga Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Singapore International Arbitration Centre,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum 1, No. 2 (2016): 201-234. https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v1i2.507

Mahendrayana, I Made Dwi Dimas. “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Melalui Arbitrase,” Acta Comitas 5, No. 1 (2020).

Mawey, Andre G. “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum (Onslag Van Alle Rechtsvervolging),” Lex Crimen 5, No. 2 (2016): 82-90.

Prameswari, Ni Gusti Nyoman Shanti and C.I.A Pemayun. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Internasional Bagi Perusahaan Multinasional,” Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum 1, No. 5 (2013): 1-5.

Putra, Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara and I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra, “Akibat Hukum Pendaftaran Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif,” Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata: ADHAPER 6, No. 1 (2020): 73-86. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i1.102

Rogers, James, and Matthew Townsend. “New Rules for the Singapore International Arbitration Centre.” Asian Dispute Review 15, No. 3 (2013): 68-73

Simbolon, Bangun, and Ramlani Lina Sinaulan. "Legal Certainty of Execution Decision of The Indonesian National Arbitration Board Number: 14/VII/ARB/BANI-MDN/2019." World Bulletin of Management and Law 17 (2022): 144-147.

Siregar, Putra Permata Mandiri. “Studi Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Melalui Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), World Intellectual Property Organizations (WIPO) Arbitration Centre dan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI),” Law Reform 9, No. 1 (2013): 124-145. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v9i1.12438

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Madmuji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009).

Sudini, Luh Putu and Desak Gde Dwi Arini, “Eksistensi Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perusahaan,” Jurnal Notariil 2, No. 2 (2017): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.2.2.402.141-148

Sulat, Gideon Hendrik. “Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Sengketa Arbitrase Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999,” Lex Crimen 5, No. 7 (2016): 58–64.

Syita, Kunti Kalma. “Penerapan Prinsip Pembuktian Hukum Perdata Formil dalam Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999,” Yuridika 29, No. 1 (2014): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i1.356

Tampongangoy, Grace Henni. “Arbitrase Merupakan Upaya Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasioanal,” Lex et Societatis 3, No. 1 (2015): 160-169. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v3i1.7081

Tektona, Rahmadi Indra. “Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pengadilan,” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 6, No. 1 (2013): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v6i1.2327

Tutojo, Tutojo. “Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas 9, No. 1 (2015): 13–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/jphl.v9i1.28

Wibowo, Intan Setiyo and Zakki Adlhiyati. “Problematika Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia,” Verstek 8, No. 1 (2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v8i1.39624

Widnyana, I Made. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska, 2006).

Yuniar, Vania Shafira, and Florentiana Yuwono. “The Comparison of Arbitration Dispute Resolution Process Between Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) and London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA).” Journal of Private and Commercial Law 6, No. 1 (2022): 77-99. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v6i1.30265