Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning to Increase Concept Mastery and Argumentation Skills
Abstract
This study aims to increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation of senior high school students in Singkawang City, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. The Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning (PABCSCHL) model in Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) especially on the topic of the forest fire on the peatlands has been developed with good validation categories by three pedagogical validators and three assessment validators and been implemented to 200 students. Their argumentation skill levels are measured based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern. The syntax of the PABCSCHL model is Reading (online), Concept Building, Discussing and Debating (offline), Experiment Designing (online), and Experiment Doing (offline). The core of this model is student collaboration in arguing, debating, and experimenting. From this research, most student solution to anticipate the fire forest on peatlands is burning and waiting until the fire is extinguished perfectly (70 students), monitoring periodically that the fire is completely extinguished (60 students), and limiting the burned area by digging trenches around the site (50 students). Student solutions describe students’ understanding of solving problems posed in group discussion sessions and debates and prove their arguments with experimental data. Before implementing the model, no student has the highest level of argumentation and concept mastery. After that, 23 students have the highest level of concept mastery, and 25 students have the highest level of argumentation. The PABCSCHL model can increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation skills. This model is a new alternative hybrid learning in the post COVID-19 pandemic. Many more SSI can be learning topics to be implemented in this model.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, M.R., Gryzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W., and Marek, A.E. (2013). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105-120.
Akbari, M., Danesh, M., Rezvani, A., Javadi, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023). The role of students’ relational identity and autotelic experience for their innovative and continuous use of e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1911-1934.
Anwar, C., Saregar, A., Zellia, N., Diani, R., & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Effect size test of learning model ARIAS and PBL: concept mastery of temperature and heat on senior high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3), 1-9.
Arias, A. M., Smith, P. S., Davis, E. A., Marino, J. C., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Justifying Predictions: Connecting use of educative curriculum materials to students’ engagement in science argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(1), 11-35.
Aristika, A., & Juandi, D. (2021). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in improving of teacher-student relationship in terms of learning motivation. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 443-456.
Arslan, H. O., Genc, M., & Durak, B. (2023). Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103905.
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J., & Tassone, V. C. (2023). The intersection of epistemic beliefs and gender in argumentation performance. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-19.
Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590-1612.
Batlolona, J. R., Baskar, C., Kurnaz, M. A., & Leasa, M. (2018). The improvement of problem-solving skills and physics concept mastery on temperature and heat topic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 273-279.
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2013). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94.
Buseyne, S., De Croon, R., Depaepe, F., Gutiérrez, F., Rajagopal, K., Van Lier, T., & Raes, A. (2023, August). Supporting Teamwork in Technology-Enhanced Adult Learning Contexts. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 41(1), 56-80.
Cetin, P. S. (2014). Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 1-20.
Chan, J., & Erduran, S. (2023). The impact of collaboration between science and religious education teachers on their understanding and views of argumentation. Research in Science Education, 53(1), 121-137.
Chen, B. H., & Chiou, H. H. (2014). Learning style, sense of community, and learning effectiveness in hybrid learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 485-496.
Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., Lin, H. S., & Hong, Z. R. (2016). Using a modified argument-driven inquiry to promote elementary school students’ engagement in learning science and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 170-191.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A 3-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 363-381.
Durak, B., & Topçu, M. S. (2023). Integrating socioscientific issues and model-based learning to decide on a local issue: the white butterfly unit. Science Activities, 60(2), 90-105.
Eilenberg, M. (2022). The last enclosure: smoke, fire and crisis on the Indonesian forest frontier. Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(5), 969-998.
Erduran, S. (2018). Toulmin’s argument pattern as a “horizon of possibilities” in the study of argumentation in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 1091-1099.
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1-12.
Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 427-448.
Fishman, E. J., Borko, H., Osborne, J., Gomez, F., Rafanelli, S., Reigh, E., ... & Berson, E. (2017). A practice-based professional development program to support scientific argumentation from evidence in the elementary classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 222-249.
Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245-249.
Giri, V., & Paily, M. U. (2020). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of critical thinking. Science Education, 29(3), 673-690.
Guppy, N., Verpoorten, D., Boud, D., Lin, L., Tai, J., & Bartolic, S. (2022). The post‐COVID`19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 25-41.
Hayasaka, H., Usup, A., & Naito, D. (2020). New approach evaluating peatland fires in Indonesian factors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 12(12), 2055-2071.
Hwang, A. (2018). Online and hybrid learning. Journal of Management Education, 42(4), 557-563.
Jamison, A., Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid learning: An integrative approach to engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 253-273.
Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2023). Feedback encounters: towards a framework for analysing and understanding feedback processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(1), 121-134.
Kaufman, K. J. (2013). 21 ways to 21st century skills: why students need them and ideas for practical implementation. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(2), 78-83.
Ke, L., Friedrichsen, P., Rawson, R., & Sadler, T. D. (2023). Teacher learning through collaborative curriculum design in the midst of a pandemic: A cultural historical activity theory investigation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103957.
Khishfe, R. (2013). Relationship between nature of science understandings and argumentation skills: A role for counterargument and contextual factors. Journal of research in science teaching, 49(4), 489-514.
Khosravi, K., Shahabi, H., Pham, B. T., Adamowski, J., Shirzadi, A., Pradhan, B., & Prakash, I. (2019). A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 311-323.
Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2013). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121-123.
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2023). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 655-669.
Lazarou, D., & Erduran, S. (2021). “Evaluate What I Was Taught, Not What You Expected Me to Know”: Evaluating Students’ Arguments Based on Science Teachers’ Adaptations to Toulmin’s Argument Pattern. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 306-324.
Lin, Y. R., Fan, B., & Xie, K. (2020). The influence of a web-based learning environment on low achievers’ science argumentation. Computers and Education, 151, 103860.
Lin, Y. R., Hung, C. Y., & Hung, J. F. (2017). Exploring teachers’ meta-strategic knowledge of science argumentation teaching with the repertory grid technique. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 105-134.
McNeill, K.L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972.
Mettis, K., & Väljataga, T. (2021). Designing learning experiences for outdoor hybrid learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 498-513.
Mou, T. Y. (2023). Science learning with designed animation: Investigation of primary school children’s attitudes toward science learning, animation integration, and understanding level. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100246.
Msimanga, A., & Lelliott, A. (2013). Making sense of science: Argumentation for meaning-making in a teacher-led whole class discussion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 192-206.
Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S., Swearingen, A., Wei, L., & Butler, A. M. (2018). Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions. Science Education, 102(6), 1239-1264.
Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Dialectical features of students’ argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43, 371-393.
Nielsen, J.A. (2013). Arguing from nature: The role of nature in student argumentations on a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 723-744.
Ningrum, R. W., Syafei, A. D., Assomadi, A. F., Boedisantoso, R., Hermana, J., & Suparta, W. (2020). The effect of air quality on the incidence of acute respiratory infection in Pontianak city. Geographia Technica, 15(2), 19-28.
Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Biemans, H. J., Smits, M., Vervoort, M. T., & Verbaan, C. L. (2023). Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students’ argumentative essay quality. Education and Information Technologies, 1-28.
Noroozi, O., Dehghanzadeh, H., & Talaee, E. (2020). A systematic review on the impacts of game-based learning on argumentation skills. Entertainment Computing, 35, 100369.
Osborne, J. F., Borko, H., Fishman, E., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., Berson, E., Busch, K. C., Reigh, E., & Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a Practice-Based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers’ Facilitation of and Student Engagement with Scientific Argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1067–1112.
Ouyang, F., Tang, Z., Cheng, M., & Chen, Z. (2023). Using an integrated discourse analysis approach to analyze a group’s collaborative argumentation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101227.
Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zhang, L., Xu, W., Zheng, L., & Cukurova, M. (2023). Making strides towards AI-supported regulation of learning in collaborative knowledge construction.
Ouyang, F., Xu, W., & Cukurova, M. (2023). An artificial intelligence-driven learning analytics method to examine the collaborative problem-solving process from the complex adaptive systems perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1-28.
Özdem, Y., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Erduran, S. (2017). The pedagogy of argumentation in science education: science teachers’ instructional practices. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1443-1464.
Ozden, M. (2020). Elementary school students’ informal reasoning and its’ quality regarding socio-scientific issues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 61-84.
Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: does presence matter? Science and Education, 4(1), 138-159.
Sadler, T.D., Foulk, J.A., and Friedrichsen, P.J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75-87.
Sadler, T.D., Romine, W.L.; and Topçu, M.S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622-1635.
Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 30(3), 589-607.
Sakamoto, M., Yamaguchi, E., Yamamoto, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2021). An intervention study on students’ decision-making towards consensus building on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1965-1983.
Sengul, O. (2019). Linking scientific literacy, scientific argumentation, and democratic citizenship. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 1090-1098.
Sparks, R. A., Jimenez, P. C., Kirby, C. K., & Dauer, J. M. (2022). Using Critical Integrative Argumentation to Assess Socioscientific Argumentation across Decision-Making Contexts. Education Sciences, 12(10), 644-675.
Tan, A. L., Lee, P. P. F., & Cheah, Y. H. (2017). Educating science teachers in the twenty-first century: Implications for pre-service teacher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 453-471.
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588.
Wallon, R. C., Jasti, C., Lauren, H. Z., & Hug, B. (2018). Implementation of a curriculum-integrated computer game for introducing scientific argumentation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 236-247.
Wicaksono, I., & Wasis, M. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual science teaching model (VS-TM) to improve student’s scientific creativity and concept mastery on senior high school physics subject. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 549.
Xu, W., Wu, Y., & Ouyang, F. (2023). Multimodal learning analytics of collaborative patterns during pair programming in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-20.
Zheng, X. L., Gu, X. Y., Lai, W. H., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, F. (2023). Development of the social metacognition inventory for online collaborative argumentation: construct validity and reliability. Educational technology research and development, 1-23.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
