Email this article Use of Metacognition Questions, Hands-On Activity, and Fantasy Ironwood Tree Metaphor for Trigonometry Learning
Abstract
The challenge of mathematics teacher of SMAN-2 Palangka Raya was student boredom. The aim of research (1) increases the students’ enthusiasm in learn trigonometry and (2) increase the learning outcome of multiplication to addition and subtraction identity of sine and cosine, used metacognition questions and fantasy ironwood tree metaphor integrated to hands-on activity. The research used the classroom action research method in three cycles of action. The subjects were 40 students of grade XI MIPA4 Specialization SMAN-2 Palangka Raya. Data comprised of learning journal, photos and video recording, and students’ answer, collected through observation and interview, and analyzed through reduction and tabulation. The research result showed the classroom atmosphere change as the impact of action implementation, in which (1) the increase of right answers numbers; (2) the emerge of learning enthusiasm; (3) the variation product of the fantasy ironwood tree creation.
Tantangan guru matematika SMAN-2 Palangka Raya munculnya kebosanan. Tujuan penelitian untuk (1) meningkatkan semangat siswa belajar trigonometri, (2) meningkatkan hasil belajar identitas perkalian ke penjumlahan dan pengurangan sine dan cosine, melalui penggunaan pertanyaan metakognisi dan metafora pohon ulin fantasi yang diintegrasikan dalam hands-on activity. Penelitian dilakisanakan dengan metode penelitian tindakan kelas dengan tiga siklus tindakan. Subjek penelitian 40 siswa kelas XI MIPA 4 Peminatan SMAN-2 Palangka Raya. Data berupa jurnal mengajar, rekaman foto-foto dan video, serta jawaban siswa, dikumpulkan dengan pengamatan dan wawancara yang dianalisis melalui reduksi dan tabulasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perubahan suasana kelas sebagai dampak pelaksanaan tindakan, dimana (1) terjadi peningkatan jumlah jawaban benar; (2) teramati munculnya semangat belajar ; (3) produk kreativitas pohon ulin fantasi yang beragam dengan tempelan jawaban soal-soal identitas perkalian sinus dan cosinus.
Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amin, I., & Sukestiyarno, Y. L. (2015). Analysis metacognitive skills on learning mathematics in high school. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(3), 213–222.
Arikunto, S. Suhardjono and Supardi. (2015). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Brown. (2006). The Trigonometric Connection: Students‟ Understanding of Sine and Cosine. Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, p.228. Prague: PME30.
De Porter, B., Reardon, M., & Singer-Nouri, S. (2001). Quantum teaching. Bandung: Kaifa.
Boero, P., Bazzini, L., & Garuti, R. (2001). Metaphors in teaching and learning mathematics: A case study concerning inequalitites. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, January, 185–192.
Erdogan, A., Yazlik, D. O., & Erdik, C. (2014). Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Metaphors about the Concept of “Mathematics.†International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 289.
Ernest, P. (2010). Mathematics and Metaphor. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 7(1), 98-104.
Gür, H. (2009). Trigonometry learning. New Horizons in Education, 57(1), 67-80.
Hadi, W., & Faradillah, A. (2020). Application of Discovery Learning Method in Mathematical Proof of Students in Trigonometry. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(1), 73–82.
Hendriana, H., Eti Rohaeti, E., & Hidayat, W. (2017). Metaphorical thinking learning and junior high school teachers’ mathematical questioning ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 55–64.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on Activities and Their Influence on Students’ Interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743–757.
Ishartono, N., Juniati, D., & Lukito, A. (2016). Developing Mathematics Teaching Devices in the Topic of Trigonometry Based on Guided Discovery Teaching Method. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(2), 154–171.
Kalra, M. B., & Baveja, B. (2012). Teacher Thinking about Knowledge, Learning and Learners: A Metaphor Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 317–326.
Kartono. (2010). Hands On Activity Pada Pembelajaran Geometri Sekolah Sebagai Asesmen Kinerja Siswa. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 1(1), 21–32.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Doing Critical Participatory Action Research: The ‘Planner’Part. In The Action Research Planner (pp. 85-114). Springer, Singapore.
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281–310.
Kukey, E., Gunes, H., & Genc, Z. (2019). Experiences of classroom teachers on the use of hands-on material and educational software in math education. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 74–86.
Mevarech, Z., & Fridkin, S. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and meta-cognition. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 85–97.
Nkopodi, N., & Mosimege, M. (2009). Incorporating the indigenous game of morabaraba in the learning of mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 29(3), 377–392.
O. Ekwueme, C., E. Ekon, E., & C. Ezenwa-Nebife, D. (2015). The Impact of Hands-On-Approach on Student Academic Performance in Basic Science and Mathematics. Higher Education Studies, 5(6), 47-51.
Ohtani, K., & Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: a meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 179–212.
Pambudiarso, R. B., Mariani, S., & Prabowo, A. (2016). Komparasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Materi Geometri Antara Model SPS dan Model SPS Dengan Hands On Activity. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(1), 1–9.
Pennequin, V., Sorel, O., Nanty, I., & Fontaine, R. (2010). Metacognition and low achievement in mathematics: The effect of training in the use of metacognitive skills to solve mathematical word problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 16(3), 198–220.
Pfaff, T. J., & Weinberg, A. (2009). Do hands-on activities increase student understanding?: A case study. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(3).
Pradjadinata, S., & Murniati, M. (2014). Pengelolaan dan Konservasi Jenis Ulin (Eusideroxylon zwageri Teijsm. & Binn.) di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam, 11(3), 205–223.
Ravikoh, R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswakelas XII IPA 4 SMAN 2 Bangkinang Kota Pada Materi Trigonometri Analitika. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(1), 56.
Riley, N., Lubans, D., Holmes, K., Hansen, V., Gore, J., & Morgan, P. (2017). Movement-based mathematics: Enjoyment and engagement without compromising learning through the EASY minds program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1653–1673.
Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(2), 149–161.
Setiawan, W. (2016). Profil Berpikir Metaforis (Metaphorical Thinking) Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pengukuran Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 208–216.
Siyepu, S. W. (2015). Analysis of errors in derivatives of trigonometric functions. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1-16.
Tachie, S. A. (2019). Meta-cognitive skills and strategies application: How this helps learners in mathematics problem-solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), em1702.
Thibodi, O. (2017). Metaphors for Learning Mathematics: An Interpretation Based on Learners’ Responses to an Exploratory Questionnaire on Mathematics and Learning. International Journal of Secondary Education, 5(6), 70-74.
Thuneberg, H., Salmi, H., & Fenyvesi, K. (2017). Hands-On Math and Art Exhibition Promoting Science Attitudes and Educational Plans. Education Research International, 2017, 1–13.
Usman, M. H., & Hussaini, M. M. (2017). Analysis of Students’ Error in Learning of Trigonometry Among Senior Secondary School Students in Zaria Metropolis, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 13(02), 1–4.
van der Stel, M., Veenman, M. V. J., Deelen, K., & Haenen, J. (2010). The increasing role of metacognitive skills in math: A cross-sectional study from a developmental perspective. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(2), 219–229.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.
Verschaffel, L., Depaepe, F., & Mevarech, Z. (2019). Learning Mathematics in Metacognitively Oriented ICT-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Education Research International, 2019, 1-19
Weber, K. (2005). Students’ understanding of trigonometric functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 91–112.
Zakiah, N. E. (2020). Level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 132–147.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
