Analisis Terhadap Kemampuan Doing Mathematics Mahasiswa Pada Perkuliahan Kapita Selekta Matematika Sekolah
Abstract
Salah satu indikator keberhasilan Sekolah Matematika belajar adalah realisasi maksimal matematika kompetensi melakukan melibatkan pemecahan masalah, penalaran, komunikasi, koneksi, representasi, dan pemahaman konseptual, diwujudkan dalam kebiasaan berpikir dan melakukan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan survei dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui pengaruh Sekolah Matematika digest belajar untuk melakukan matematika kompetensi siswa, dan perbaikannya. Para siswa yang dipilih sebagai subjek penelitian adalah mereka yang mengambil Sekolah Matematika Digest 1 saja, di semester genap dari 2013-2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Sekolah Matematika Digest 1 tentu saja memiliki pengaruh yang kuat pada peningkatan kompetensi melakukan matematika siswa, baik komponen dengan komponen dan sepenuhnya, yaitu, kompetensi penalaran, komunikasi, koneksi, representasi, pemahaman konseptual, dan membuktikan. Selain itu, ditemukan bahwa 86% siswa dari matematika pemecahan masalah kompetensi yang sangat baik, sisanya 14% berada pada tingkat cukup. Sementara itu, kualitas peningkatan kompetensi melakukan matematika siswa, baik komponen dengan komponen dan sepenuhnya, jatuh ke dalam kategori yang adil.
One of the indicators of the success of School Mathematics learning is the maximal realization of the doing mathematics competences involving problem solving, reasoning, communication, connection, representation, and conceptual comprehension, realized in the habits of thinking and doing. The research was a descriptive research by a survey approach intended to determine the influence of School Mathematics digest learning on students’ doing mathematics competence, and its improvement. The students selected as the subjects of research were those who took School Mathematics Digest 1 course, in the even semester of 2013-2014. The research findings showed that School Mathematics Digest 1 course has a strong influence on the improvement of the students’ doing mathematics competence, both component by component and wholly, i.e., reasoning competence, communication, connection, representation, conceptual comprehension, and proving. In addition, it was found that 86% students were of very good mathematic problem solving competence, the remaining 14% being at an insufficient level. Meanwhile, the quality of the improvement of students’ doing mathematics competence, both component by component and wholly, fell into a category of fair.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arend, Richard. (1997). Classroom Instruction and Management. New York: Mc Graw Hill
Annette & Sue. (1999). Assessing Problem Solving Thought Mathematics Teaching in Middle School. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 4(5), 305-311
Atweh, Bill. (1998). The Construction of Social Context of Mathematics Classroom: A Sociolinguistic Analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 29 (1): Hal 63-82.
Baroody. A.J. (1993). Problem Solving, Reasoning, and Communicating. Macmillan Publising, New York.
Beaton, A. E. (1996). Mathematics Achievement in The Middle School Years. Boston: TIMSS International Study Center.
Bell, E.H. (1978). Teaching and Learning Secondary School Mathematics. Dubuque: WMC Brown.
Burril, J. (1997). Field Test Report: Mathematics in contex Boosts Test Scores. WCER Highlighs, Vol. 8 No. 3.
Buletin Educational Innovation and Information Nomor 97-105: IBE
Cai ,J & Patricia. (2000). Fostering Mathematical Thinking through Multiple Solutions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. Volume 5 No 8 April 2000.www.nctm.org/mtms/2000/04/index.htm, diakses 8 April 2001.
Cobb, Paul. (1997). Instructional Design and Reforma: A Plea for Developmental Research in Contex. . In Beishuizein, Gravemeijer & van Leishout (Eds.). The Role Of Contexts and Models in The Development of Mathematical Strategies and Procedures. CD- Series On Research And Mathematics Education. Freudenthal Institute Utrecht Belanda.
Cobb, Yackel & Wood. (1992). A Contructivist alternative to the representational view of Mind in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 23: Hal 2-33.
De Lange, J. (1987). Mathematics insight and meaning. OW&OC. Utrecht: University Press.
De Lange, J. (1995). Assessment: no change without problems, In Romberg, TA. (Ed). Reform in School Mathematics and authentic assessment. New York: Sunny Press.
Ellis. (2011). Hypothesis Testing, Wiki, Series, Memphis: Books LLC.
Ellis. (2013). The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes, Mexico City: Cambridge University Press.
Hake, RR. (1998). Analyzing Change/Gain score, Department of Physics, Indiana University.
IBE. (2000). Improving students achievement in Mathematics. Educational Practice Series-4. IBE.UNESCO.
Lappan, G. (2002). Connected Mathematics Project: Research and Evaluation Summary.
Meel, D.E. (2003). Models and Theories of Mathematical Understanding: Comparing Pirie and Kieren’s Model of the Growth of Mathematical Understanding and APOS Theory. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 12, 132-181.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1990). Contructivist Views on The Teaching ang Learning of Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Reston, Virginia:NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000a). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM: Reston VA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000b). Learning Mathematics For A New Century. 2000Yearbook NCTM: Reston VA.
National Science Foundation. (1998). Mathematics in Context: Teachers Resource and Implementation Guide. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britanica Ed. Co.
National Science Foundation. (2000). The Core-Plus Mathematics Project (CPMP), (Online), www.mich.edu/cpmp/front.html, Diakses 21 Agustus 2000).
Orton, Anthony. (1992). Learning Mathematics: Issues, Theory and Classroom Practice. Cassell Education Series. London.
Palincsar, A.S. (1986). Reciprocal teaching. In Teaching reading as thinking. Oak
Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Pugalee, D. (2001). Using Communication to Develop Students’ Mathematical Literacy. Mathematics Teaching in The Middle School Vol 6 No 5 Januari. Hlm: 296-299
Schifter, D. and Fosnot, C.T. (1993). Reconstruction Mathematics Education. Teacher’s College, Columbia University.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1991). On Mathematics as Sense Making: An Informal Attach on the Unfornute Divorce of Formal and Informal Mathematics. In J.F Voss, D.N. Perkins & J.W Segal (Eds.) Informal Reasoning and Education. 311-344. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Seegers,G & Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Implementation and Effect Of Realistic Curricula. In Beishuizein, Gravemeijer & van Leishout (Eds.). The Role Of Contexts and Models in The Development of Mathematical Strategies and Procedures. CD- Series On Research And Mathematics Education. Freudenthal Institute Utrecht Belanda.
Simon. M.A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 26, 115-145.
Slavin, Robert. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theories and Practice. Fourth Edition. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Slettenhaar, (2000), Adapting Realistic Mathematics Education in The Indonesia Context. Dalam Majalah Ilmiah Himpunan Matematika Indonesia. (Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Matematika X, ITB, 17-24 Juli 2000.
Souviney, R.J. (1994). Learning to Teach Mathematics. New York: Addison Wesley.
Tom Gorris. (1998). Reforms in secondary math education in the Netherland. www.fiuu.nl/en/indexpublicaties.
UNESCO. (1998). Education For the Twenty-first century: issues and prospects. Unesco Publishing
Verschafel, L.&De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching Realistics Mathematical Modeling in the Elementary School: A Teaching Experiment with Fifth Graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Volume 28 No 5, November: 577-601.
Zawojewski, J.S, Robinson, M, & Hoover, M. (1999). Reflections on Developing Mathematics and the Connected Mathematics Project. Journal for Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 4, 324-330.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.