Designing Hybrid Learning Tools Based on Lesson Study for Learning Community against Metacognition Ability

Diah Putri Madinda, Hobri Hobri, Alfian Futuhul Hadi, Mailulah Ely Fauziyah

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the outcomes of establishing valid, practical, effective Hybrid Learning tools based on Lesson Study for Learning Community (LSLC) and their impact on students' metacognitive abilities. Research and Development (R & D) and experimental research are used to conduct the study. The research subjects are consisted of three classes of 7th grade students. Collaborative Learning and Learning Community are implemented which are the components of LSLC. The 4-D model, which includes define, design, develop, and disseminate, is used to develop learning tools. Lesson plans, worksheets, and a metacognition ability test were created as a result of the research and met the criteria of being of valid, practical, and effective. Based on experimental research, there is a significant effect of Hybrid Learning tools based on Lesson Study for Learning Community on students' metacognitive abilities with p-value of 0.001 (sig < 0.05).

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hasil pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran Hybrid Learning berbasis Lesson Study for Learning Community yang valid, praktis, efektif dan menganlisis pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan metakognisi siswa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode penelitian kombinasi atau mix method. Penelitian ini menggabungkan dua bentuk penelitian yaitu penelitian pengembangan (research and development) dan penelitian eksperimen. Subjek penelitian dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari tiga kelas siswa VII yang terdiri dari kelas uji coba, kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Komponen Lesson Study for Learning Community yang diterapkan yaitu Collaborative Learning dan Learning Community. Proses pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran dilaksanakan melalui 4-D yaitu pendefinisian, perancangan, pengembangan dan penyebaran. Hasil pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran Hybrid Learning berbasis Lesson Study for Learning Community berupa RPP, LKS dan tes kemampuan metakognisi siswa yang valid, praktis dan efektif. Berdasarkan penelitian eksperimen dan observasi, terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan perangkat pembelajaran Hybrid Learning berbasis Lesson Study for Learning Community terhadap kemampuan metakognisis siswa dengan nilai signifikasi 0.001 .

Keywords

Instructional Tools; Hybrid Learning; LSLC; Metacognition; Collaborative Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdurrahman, M. (2012). Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Abeysekera, L & Dawsom, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research Higher Education. Research and Development, 34 (1), 1–14.

Al-Fatih, S., Ahsany, F., & Alamsyah, A. F. (2020). Legal Protection of Labor Rights During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum.

Anggo, Mustamin. (2011). Pelibatan Metakognisi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Edumatica, 1 (1).

An, Y. J & Cao, L. (2014). Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding onStudents’ Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment. MERLOT. Jounal of Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 525-568.

Ariestina, M. P., Yunarti, T., & Sutiarso, S. (2014). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unila,2(2), 1-12.

Asyrofi, M & Junaedi, I. (2016). Kemampuan representasi matematis ditinjau dari multiple intellingence pada pembelajaran hybrid learning berbasis konstruktivisme. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 5(1).

Blair, E., Maharaj, Chris., & Primus, S. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21, (6), 1465-1482.

De Corte, E. (2003, September). Intervention Research: A Tool for Bridging the Theory–Practice Gap in Mathematics Education. In Proceedings of the International Conference, The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project, Brno Czech Republic.

Desmita. (2017). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Fredriksen, H. (2021). Exploring Realistic Mathematics Education in a Flipped Classroom Context at the Tertiary Level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 377-396.

Guntur, M., Kartono., and Junaedi, I. (2021). The Implementation of Comic Supplementary Tutor Feedback in Contextual Teaching Hybrid Learning on The Achievement of Higher Order Thinking Skill Viewed from Students’ Mathematics Disposition. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(A), 76-82.

Hasanah, U., Rosyida, I., & Rachmani, N. (2021). Mathematics Communications skill seen from sel-efficacy of junior high school students on 7E learning cycle with ethnomathematics nuances. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Resesarch, 10 (2), 190-196.

Heinze A and Pocter. (2010). The Signifcance of the Refective in Blended Learning. International Journal of Mobile Blended Learning, 2 (2), 18-29.

Romlah, S., Prihandoko, A. C., Safitri, J., & Nazareth, E. (2018, September). Students’ metacognitive ability in mathematical problem-solving learning based on lesson study for learning community (LSLC). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012064). IOP Publishing.

Indrawanti, D., Hadi, A. F., & Fauziah, E. W. (2019, March). Critical thinking ability in solving triangle problems based on lesson study for learning community (LSLC). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 243, No. 1, p. 012146). IOP Publishing.

Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2 (4), 449-473

Istianingsih, S & Hasbullah. (2015). Blended Learning, Trend Strategi Pembelajaran Masa Depan. Jurnal Elemen, 1 (1), 49-56.

Kenedi, A. K. (2018). Desain Instrument Higher Order Thingking Pada Mata Kuliah Dasar-Dasar Matematika Di Jurusan PGSD. AR-RIAYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 67-80.

Kristiani, N., Susilo, H, Rohman, F., D. Corebima., & Aloysius. (2015). The contribution of students’ metacognitive skills and scientific attitude towards their academic achievements in biology learning implementing Thinking Empowerment by Questioning (TEQ) learning integrated with inquiry learning (TEQI). International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 2 (9), 113-120.

Lauren, T. (2009). Penjejangan Metakognisi Siswa. Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Lin, W. S & Wang, C. H. (2012) Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58 (1), 88-89.

Martini, J. (2014). Kesulitan Belajar: Perspektif, Asesmen dan Penaggulangannya. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Murtikusuma, R. P., Fatahillah, A., Hussen, S., Prasetyo, R. R., & Alfarisi, M. A. (2019, February). Development of blended learning based on Google Classroom with osing culture theme in mathematics learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1165, No. 1, p. 012017). IOP Publishing.

Nasution, T. K and Sihombing, K. (2017). Development of Student Worksheet Geometry Based Metacognitive Strategy Through Creative Thinking Ability. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(4), 10-18.

Prayitno, E.; and Masduki, L.R. (2013). Pengembangan Media Blended Learning dengan Model Flipped Classroom pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Matematika II. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1 (2), 121-126.

Rozen, M.T, & Kramarski, B. (2014). Metacognition, motivation, and emotions: Contribution of self-regulated learning to solving mathematical problems. Global Education Review, 1(4), 76-95.

Salam, M., La Misu., Utu Rahi., Hindaryatiningsih, N and AbdRahman A. Ghani. (2020). Strategies of Metacognition Based on Behavioural Learning to Improve Metacognition Awareness and Mathematics Ability of Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 61-72.

Sailo, I. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Karangan Narasi Menggunakan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Siswa Kelas IV. Basic Education, 6(5), 501-507.

Saito, E., Murase, M., dan Tsukui, A. (2015). Lesson study for learning community A Guide To Sustainable School Reform. New York. Routledge 711 Third Avenue.

Saleh, K., Rukiyah, I., & Arbain, M. (2021). Blended Learning as a Developmental Model Strategy of Teaching and Learning in Islamic Universities in Indonesia. Dinamika Ilmu, 21(2), 463-475.

Santangelo, J., Cadieux, M., & Zapata, S. (2015). Developing student metacognitive skills using active learning with embedded metacognition instruction. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449-473.

Shen, C. Y & Liu, H. C. (2011). Metacognitive Skills Development: a Web Based Approach in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(2), 140-150.

Sowanto, S., Andang, A., Mutmainnah, M., & Saputra, H. A. (2019). Kemampuan Self Efficacy Mahasiswa Melalui Bahan Ajar Metode Statistika Menggunakan Hybrid Learning Pada Tantangan Revolusi Industri 4.0. Supermat. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3 (2), 65-73.

Sriarunrasmee, J., Techataweewanb, W., & Mebusaya, R.P. (2015). Blended Learning Supporting Self-Directed Learning and Communication Skills of Srinakharinwirot University’s First Year Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal. 197, 1564–1569.

Sudirman, S., Cahyono, E., & Kadir, K. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa SMP Pesisir Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, 3 (2).

Thongmak, M. (2013). Social network system in classroom: Antecedents of edmodo adoption. Journal of E-learning and Higher Education, 2013(1), 1-15.

World Health Organizaton. (2020). Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it.

Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. H. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55 (1), 155-164.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.