Rasch Model Analysis: Development of Literacy Numeracy Assessment Instrument of Electromagnetic Induction

Nurul Apriani Susanti(1), Sarwi Sarwi(2), Mahardika Prasetya Aji(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v7i2.46019


(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

This research aimed to describe the validity of a numeracy literacy assessment instrument of electromagnetic induction based on minimum capability assessment (MCA) which was develop using Rasch model analysis assisted by Winstep software. The research employed the research and development design with a modified Mardapi model. The instrument was constructed by developing fifteen questions. The analysis of the instrument was utilized to measure the construct and item validity, reliability, item difficulty level, and item discriminatory. This research involved 32 participants in the small-scale test and 206 participants in the large-scale trial. The test result showed that the fifteen questions were suitable to use because it has values that meet the criteria for all measurement variables both on small scale and large-scale tests and could be assess students' numeracy literacy skills.

Keywords

Minimum Capability Assessment (AKM), Electromagnetic induction, Numeracy Literacy, Rasch Model Analysis, Winstep software

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aghekyan, R. (2020). Validation of the SIEVEA instrument using the Rasch analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 103(May), 101619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101619

Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi revisi).

Aryadoust, V., Ng, L. Y., & Sayama, H. (2021). A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research. Language Testing, 38(1), 6–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220927487

Azizah, & Wahyuningsih, S. (2020). Penggunaan Model Rasch Untuk Analisis Instrumen the Use of Rasch Model for Analyzing Test. J U P I T E K Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45–50.

Dewi, S. S., Hariastuti, R. M., & Utami, A. U. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran Dan Daya Pembeda Soal Olimpiade Matematika (Omi) Tingkat Smp Tahun 2018. Transformasi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 3(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v3i1.388

Himelfarb, I. (2019). A primer on standardized testing: History, measurement, classical test theory, item response theory, and equating. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 33(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-18-22

Kurniawan, U., & Andriyani, K. D. K. (2018). Analisis Soal Pilihan Ganda dengan Rasch Model. Jurnal Statistika, 6(1), 34–39.

Mufida, S. N., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2022). Developing MOFI on Transverse Wave to Explore Students ’ Misconceptions Today : Utilizing Rasch Model Analysis. JPPIPA : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2499–2507. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2229

Mursidi, A., & Soeharto, S. (2017). an Introduction: Evaluation of Quality Assurance for Higher Educational Institutions Using Rasch Model. JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v1i1.25

Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 20111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020111

Saputri, V., & Diana, H. A. (2021). Development of HOTS Problem-Based Test Instruments to Measure Level 4 Numeracy Capabilities Using Rasch Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(4), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v7i4.2371

Smiley, J. (2015). Classical test theory or Rasch- A personal account from a novice user. Shiken, 19(1), 16–29.

Susac, A., Planinic, M., Klemencic, D., & Milin Sipus, Z. (2018). Using the Rasch model to analyze the test of understanding of vectors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 23101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.023101

Syadiah, A. N., & Hamdu, G. (2020). Analisis rasch untuk soal tes berpikir kritis pada pembelajaran STEM di sekolah dasar. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i2.6524

Yusuf, M., & Wulan, A. R. (2016). Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Tipe Shared Dan Webbed Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dan Kps Siswa. Edusains, 8(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1730

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


View My Stats