Typosquatting Crime in the Electronic Transactions

Article Sidebar

Full Text (English)
Published Feb 28, 2021
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i1.43188

Main Article Content

Alif Kharismadohan
Postgraduate Program, Master of Laws, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Today's technological developments have brought many changes to human life. This change will certainly bring benefits to life, including making all transactions easier and faster. However, there are still some parties who take advantage of technology to act crimes. Among them is typosquatting, which is impersonating a domain name that is almost similar to the original domain name and has the same contents as the original domain. This will be detrimental to transaction service users. This research aims to analyze and study typosquatting in electronic transactions in Indonesia and its law enforcement. This study found that these crimes often committed on the internet were used to trick internet users by creating a fake website using names that were very similar to well-known websites. Furthermore, this research underlines that typosquatting legal arrangements in Indonesia can be seen in the Trademark Law, the Criminal Code, as well as the Information and Electronic Transaction Law.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kharismadohan, A. (2021). Typosquatting Crime in the Electronic Transactions. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i1.43188
Issue
Vol 7 No 1 (2021): L. Research Rev. Q. (February 2021) "National and International Challenges in Law Enforcement for Various Crimes in Indonesia"
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLE

All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

References

Ansyahrul, A. F. (2003). Domain Name dalam Hukum Indonesia (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Airlangga).

Arifah, D. A. (2011). Kasus Cybercrime di Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 18(2), 185-195.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bunga, D. (2019). Legal Response to Cybercrime in Global and National Dimensions. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 6(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n1.a4.

Chintia, E., Nadiah, R., Ramadhani, H. N., Haedar, Z. F., Febriansyah, A., & Kom, N. A. R. S. (2019). Kasus Kejahatan Siber yang Paling Banyak Terjadi di Indonesia dan Penanganannya. JIEET (Journal of Information Engineering and Educational Technology), 2(2), 65-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jieet.v2n2.p65-69.

Dharmaadi, I. P. A., Bakhrun, A., Saputra, D., & Putra, A. M. A. (2014, November). Typo-squatting crime in Indonesia online banking. In 2014 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI) (pp. 269-272). IEEE.

Ersya, M. P. (2017). Permasalahan Hukum dalam Menanggulangi Cyber Crime di Indonesia. Journal of Moral and Civic Education, 1(1), 50-62.

Hius, J. J., Saputra, J., & Nasution, A. (2014). Mengenal Dan Mengantisipasi Kegiatan Cybercrime Pada Aktifitas Online Sehari-Hari Dalam Pendidikan, Pemerintahan dan Industri Dan Aspek Hukum Yang Berlaku. Prosiding SNIKOM.

Iman, N., Susanto, A., & Inggi, R. (2019). Analisa Perkembangan Digital Forensik dalam Penyelidikan Cybercrime di Indonesia (Systematic Review). InComTech: Jurnal Telekomunikasi dan Komputer, 9(3), 186-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/incomtech.v9i3.7210.

Irfan, M., Ramdhani, M. A., Darmalaksana, W., Wahana, A., & Utomo, R. G. (2018, November). Analyzes of cybercrime expansion in Indonesia and preventive actions. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 434, No. 1, p. 012257). IOP Publishing.

Jhon, R. M. (2018). Existence of Criminal Law on Dealing Cyber Crime in Indonesia. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 3(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v3i1.16945.

Ketaren, E. (2016). Cybercrime, Cyber Space, dan Cyber Law. Jurnal Times, 5(2), 35-42. https://ejournal.stmik-time.ac.id/index.php/jurnalTIMES/article/view/556.

Marheni, N. P. D. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Berkaitan Dengan Pencantuman Desclaimer Oleh Pelaku Usaha Dalam Situs Internet (Website). Thesis, Universitas Udayana, Bali.

Moeljatno, M. (2005). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Moore, T., & Edelman, B. (2010, January). Measuring the perpetrators and funders of typosquatting. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (pp. 175-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Muthia, F. R., & Arifin, R. (2019). Kajian Hukum Pidana Pada Kasus Kejahatan Mayantara (Cybercrime) Dalam Perkara Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Indonesia. RESAM Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.32661/resam.v5i1.18.

Rahardjo, A. (2002). Cybercrime Pemahaman dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Raodia, R. (2019). Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi Terhadap Terjadinya Kejahatan Mayantara (Cybercrime). Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, 6(2), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v6i2.11399.

Rosidawati, I., & Santoso, E. (2017). Pelanggaran Internet Marketing Pada Kegiatan E-Commerce Dikaitkan dengan Etika Bisnis. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 43(1), 27-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol43.no1.1507.

Setiawan, D. (2005). Sistem Keamanan Komputer. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Sirait, T. N., & Simangungsong, J. B. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Tugas Pokok Pengelola Domain Internet Indonesia. Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion, 1(01), 52-62. https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/opinion/article/view/38.

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2018). e-commerce Tinjauan dari Perspektif Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 6(6), 6-15.

Sofwan, H., & Naufal, M. (2012). Penegakan Hukum Cyber Crime Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Spaulding, J., Upadhyaya, S., & Mohaisen, A. (2016, August). The landscape of domain name typosquatting: Techniques and countermeasures. In 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) (pp. 284-289). IEEE.

Sukayasa, I. N., & Suryathi, W. (2018). Law Implementation of Cybercrime in Indonesia. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 8(2), 123-130.

Suryabrata, S. (1987). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Tahir, R., Raza, A., Ahmad, F., Kazi, J., Zaffar, F., Kanich, C., & Caesar, M. (2018, April). It's all in the name: Why some URLs are more vulnerable to typosquatting. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (pp. 2618-2626). IEEE.

Tamara, A. D. (2016). Analisis Kasus-Kasus Kejahatan Perbankan Melalui Internet Banking di Indonesia (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).

Wahid, A., & Labib, M. (2005). Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime). Jakarta: PT.Refika Aditama.

Widodo, W. (2013). Aspek Hukum Pidana Kejahatan Mayantara. Yogyakarta: Asswaja Presindo.

Wijaya, M. R., & Arifin, R. (2020). Cyber Crime in International Legal Instrument: How Indonesia and International Deal with This Crime?. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 5(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v5i1.23273.

Zulkefli, Z., Singh, M. M., Shariff, A. R. M., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Typosquat cyber crime attack detection via smartphone. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 664-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.203.