Patriarchy and the Regulation of Feminity in Edo Japan: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis

Authors

  • Nina Alia Ariefa Universitas Al-azhar Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/chie.v13i2.31439

Keywords:

Discourse analysis, gender and power, patriarchy, Japanese literature

Abstract

Literary works serve as cultural instruments that reflect and perpetuate dominant social ideologies, including those related to gender and power. This study investigates the construction of women’s discourse during the Edo period (1603–1868), a feudal era under Tokugawa rule, through a Foucauldian analysis of Shinjū Tenno Amijima, one of the most prominent plays of the time. Using Foucault’s theory of discourse and a qualitative discourse-analytical approach, the research examines how female subjectivity is represented, regulated, and disciplined within the text. The findings reveal that portrayals of women’s self-sacrifice, emotional restraint, and loyalty to men function as mechanisms of social control that reproduce patriarchal values. These depictions naturalize women’s subordination and reinforce gendered hierarchies within Edo society. The study further argues that discourse in Shinjū Tenno Amijima operates as a form of power—one that shapes gender norms and legitimizes women’s roles within the sociocultural structure of the period. By situating literary representation within the broader framework of Foucauldian discourse theory, this research contributes to understanding how literature not only mirrors but also sustains systems of power and patriarchy in premodern Japan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, S. M. (2014). Foucault dan komunikasi (Telaah konstruksi wacana dan kuasa Foucault dalam lingkup ilmu komunikasi) [Foucault and communication: A study of Foucault's construction of discourse and power within the scope of communication science]. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(3), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v7i3.27

Budianta, M. (2002). Pendekatan feminis terhadap wacana: Sebuah pengantar [Feminist approaches to discourse: An introduction]. In I. D. Aminuddin (Ed.), Analisis wacana: Dari linguistik sampai dekonstruksi. Kanal.

Esmaeil, N., & Reza, K. (2016). Suffrage movement and the subversion of the “juridico-discursive” power in the Victorian period: Elizabeth Robins and the concept of “new women.” K@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature, 18(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.18.2.42-47

Febriyanti, W. (2013). Power relation in Tahmima Anam’s The Good Muslim. Litera Kultura: Journal of Literary and Cultural Studies, 1(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26740/lk.v1i3.3844

Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). Pantheon Books.

Gangloff, E. J. (1976). Tanizaki’s use of traditional literature: A comparison of Manji and Shinjū Tenno Amijima. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 11(2/3), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/489464

Ishii, R. (1989). Sejarah institusi politik Jepang [History of Japanese political institutions]. Gramedia.

Ishikawa, M. (1977). Onna daigaku shū [The great learning for women]. Heibonsha.

Keene, D. (1997). Four major plays of Chikamatsu. Columbia University Press.

Marcus, J. (1978). Art and anger. Feminist Studies, 4(1), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177626

Najita, T. (1987). Visions of virtue in Tokugawa Japan: The Kaitokudō merchant academy of Osaka. University of Chicago Press.

Ooms, H. (1985). Tokugawa ideology: Early constructs, 1570–1680. Princeton University Press.

Tonomura, H. (1990). Women and the patriarchal household in Tokugawa Japan. In A. Molony & K. Uno (Eds.), Gendering modern Japanese history (pp. xx–xx). Harvard University Asia Center.

Yeng, S. (2020). Expressing anger with mindfulness. In Buddhist feminism (pp. 93–116). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51162-3_6

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Article ID

31439