Phenomenological Research in Art Studies: A Robust Framework for Aesthetic Inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v25i2.1398Keywords:
phenomenology; art research; aesthetic experience; epoché; lived experienceAbstract
This article examines aesthetic experience as a central focus in art research, a field complicated by its inherent subjective and objective dimensions. It proposes a phenomenological methodological framework designed to balance the objective analysis of artworks with a subjective understanding of individual experience. The recommended methods are grounded in core phenomenological principles, including an emphasis on lived experience, the application of epoché (the bracketing of preconceptions), phenomenological reductions for uncovering essences, and the description of essential experiences. The article demonstrates that phenomenological approaches can systematically accommodate the depth of subjective experience and the personal nature of art, while maintaining the analytical rigor essential for academic research. Notably, this article presents a coherent methodological approach for examining aesthetic experience, effectively bridging the gap between scientific rigor and aesthetic sensibility, and thereby fostering a richer, deeper understanding of how art is experienced and interpreted.
References
Andrews, J. (2019). Erasure and epoché: Phenomenological strategies for thinking in and with destruction. Issue, (08), 69–79.
Benedek, Z. (2020). The phenomenology of theater performance. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Studia Philosophica Europeanae, 2, 187–206. https://doi.org/10.14712/24646504.2022.10
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: An essay on art and literature. Columbia University Press.
Bouzioti, D. (2023). Introducing the Phenomenological Model of Performance Practice (PMPP): Phenomenological research design and life experience in performance. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211142
Burley, M. (2021). ‘That’s what art does’: Disclosing religious and ethical possibilities through film. Sophia, 60, 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00794-5
Butler, J. L. (2016). Rediscovering Husserl: Perspectives on the epoché and reduction. The Qualitative Report, 21(11), 2033–2043. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2327
Caldarola, E., & Leñador, J. (2024). On affective installation art. Topoi, 43, 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10032-z
Chan, Z. C. Y., Fung, Y., & Chien, W. (2013). Bracketing in phenomenology: Only done in the process of data collection and analysis. The Qualitative Report, 18(30), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1486
Chilton, G., Gerber, N., & Scotti, V. (2015). Towards an intersubjective paradigm of aesthetics for art-based research: An art therapy perspective. Observatory: A Multi-disciplinary Journal in the Arts, 5(1-6), 1–33. https://www.unescoejournal.com/volume-5-issue1/
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Crowther, P. (2022). The phenomenology of aesthetic consciousness and fantasy working with Husserl. Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Perigee Books.
Drummond, J. J., & Embree, L. (1992). Phenomenology of noema. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3425-7
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating swamps: Opportunities and challenges of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
Finlay, L. (2011). Phenomenology for therapists: Examining the world we live in. Wiley Blackwell.
Finlay, L. (2013). Phenomenology for therapists: Examining the world lived through. Journal of Indo-Pacific Phenomenology, 13(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119975004
Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method. Continuum.
Gerber, N. (2016). Understanding art-based research: An intersubjective approach to relational aesthetics. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 51, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2016.08.006
Giorgi, A. (2002). The phenomenology of time: Edmund Husserl’s analysis of the consciousness of time [Review of the book The phenomenology of time, by T. Kortooms]. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33(2), 281–282.
Giorgi, A. (2008). Difficulties faced in the application of phenomenological methods in the social sciences. Journal of Indo-Pacific Phenomenology, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/20797222.2008.11433956
Giorgi, A. (2010). Phenomenology and practice of science. Existential Analysis: Journal of Society for Existential Analysis, 21(1), 1–10.
Giorgi, A. (2012). Descriptive phenomenological psychological methods. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632934
Giorgi, A. P., & Giorgi, B. M. (2003). Descriptive phenomenological psychological methods. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 243–273). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10595-013
Giorgi, A., Giorgi, B., & Morley, J. (2017). Descriptive phenomenological psychological methods. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 176–192). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n11
Grant, J. (2020). Art and achievement. Philosophical Studies, 177, 2517–2539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01324-x
Gupta, N., & Zieske, C. (2024). Art-based phenomenological research: Theory and practice. Qualitative Psychology, 11(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000285
Hasbiansyah. (2008). Phenomenological approaches: An introduction to research practices in the social and communication sciences. Mediator: Journal of Communication, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i1.1146
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Hofmann, F. (2016). Analysis of social phenomenology as a research method for gallery talks in art museums. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 17(33), 1–16. http://www.ijea.org/v17n33/
Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). Routledge.
Kortooms, T. (2002). The phenomenology of time: Edmund Husserl’s analysis of time consciousness. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9918-4
Lee, S. (2025, May 27). Exploring consciousness in phenomenology. Number Analytics Blog. [suspicious link removed]
Litdia, S. E. (2020, September 25). Phenomenology as a method: An important issue [Seminar presentation]. University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta. https://repository.umj.ac.id/3699/1/Sertifikat%20dan%20Materi_25%20Sept%202020.pdf
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
Mikalonytė, E. S., & Kneer, M. (2025). The folk concept of art. Synthese, 205(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04812-8
Peek, G. (2021). Phenomenology and the unity of consciousness. Synthese, 199, 5455–5477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03031-9
Penchev, V. (2021). ‘Noema’ and ‘noesis’ by information after Husserl’s phenomenology formally interpreted. Cambridge Open Engagement. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2021-m5p9n
Postman, J. B. (2016). The phenomenology of cybernetic music, realized speculative realism, and aesthetics-driven technologies for spontaneous audio-visual expression. Perspectives of New Music, 54(1), 5–95. https://doi.org/10.7757/persnewmusi.54.1.0005
Siewert, C. (2022). Phenomenology and intentionalism. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-intentionality/phenomenology-intentionalism.html
Smith, J. A., & Fieldsend, M. (2021). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In P. M. Camic (Ed.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 147–166). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-008
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). Sage Publications.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2016). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 25–52). Sage Publications.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2023). Phenomenological analysis of the bracketing experience. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 20(3), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2023.191635
Sobur, A. (2013). Media text analysis: An introduction to discourse analysis, semiotic analysis, and framing analysis. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suyanto. (2019). Phenomenology as a method in the research of musical theater performances. Lakon: Journal of Puppet Studies & Creation, 16(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.33153/lakon.v16i1.3154
Thomas, S. P., & Sohn, B. K. (2023). From uncomfortable wriggling to self-discovery: A phenomenological analysis of the bracketing experience. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231191635
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action-sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Phenomenology & Practice, 8(2), 25–42.
van Manen, M. (2023). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Vassiliou, F. (2023). The phenomenology of aesthetic and imaginary consciousness: Working with Husserl [Book review]. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 10(2), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2023.2267914
