The Readiness and Constraints of Technological Integration in Implementing the Case Method and Team-Based Projects in the Mechanics Course

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/dw5h5588

Keywords:

Case Method, Mechanics Course, Science Education, Team-Based Project, Technological Integration

Abstract

The case method and team-based projects in the mechanics course are designed to help science teacher candidates master the principles of mechanics. This study aims to analyze the readiness and constraints of technological integration in implementing the case method and team-based projects in the mechanics course of the natural science education program. The study was conducted using a survey method with respondents or samples consisting of two lecturers teaching the mechanics course, 64 pre-service science teachers, and an analysis of the mechanics course documents in the Science Education Study Program at a state university in Central Java, Indonesia. Data collection techniques for this study were carried out using a blended approach (online and face-to-face), a Google Forms questionnaire, online interviews (zoom meeting), and document review. Data analysis was carried out using the triangulation method, which combines various predetermined data and sources, including data from the mechanics course lecturers and students and the lecture tool documents. The results indicate that the readiness for implementing the case method and team-based project in the mechanics course is supported by a good understanding from lecturers and students and adequate resources. The student’s understanding of the approaches used by the lecturer obtained concept approach (71.40%), direct instruction model (85.70%), and discussion method (78.60%). In its implementation, the case method follows the theory and expectations in the mechanics lectures in the curriculum documents. Meanwhile, team-based projects still need improvement and development in their application to the mechanics course. The skills trained in the mechanics course are still limited to critical thinking skills, communication, and collaboration. Generic science skills have been trained but have not been specifically labeled, and creative thinking skills have not been technically facilitated to be trained. The carrying capacity of the learning environment is quite good based on ICT. However, it is still dominated by PowerPoint presentations and virtual lab applications, while coding blocks and AR-VR have not yet been developed. The conclusion indicates that while there is strong readiness and adequate resources for implementing the case method and team-based projects in the mechanics course, significant constraints exist in developing creative thinking skills, generic science skills, and consistency in applying learning models. Specific improvements are needed in the practical application of team-based projects and the integration of ICT that can assist mechanics lectures, such as coding blocks and AR-VR technology. It is recommended to enhance comprehension of the case method and team-based projects among lecturers and students and to advance technological integration, especially focusing on AR-VR and coding blocks.

Author Biographies

  • Muhamad Taufiq, Universitas Negeri Semarang
    1. Science Education Doctoral Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
    2. Science Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Ida Kaniawati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

    Science Education Doctoral Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

  • Liliasari Liliasari, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

    Science Education Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

  • Kulthida Nugultham , Kasetsart University

    Faculty of Education and Development Sciences, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

  • Hyung-Yong Park , Gyeongin National University of Education, South Korea

    Department of Science Education, Gyeongin National University of Education, South Korea

References

Adler, R. F., & Kim, H. (2018). Enhancing future K-8 teachers’ computational thinking skills through modeling and simulations. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1501-1514.

Alward, E., & Phelps, Y. (2019). Impactful leadership traits of virtual leaders in higher education. On-line Learning, 23(3), 72–93.

Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79.

Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346-355.

Atchison, C., Bowman, L. R., Vrinten, C., Redd, R., Pristerà, P., Eaton, J., & Ward, H. (2021). Early perceptions and behavioural responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK adults. BMJ open, 11(1), e043577.

Atkins, P. W., Wilson, D. S., & Hayes, S. C. (2019).Prosocial: Using evolutionary science to build productive, equitable, and collaborative groups. New Harbinger Publications.

Azhikannickal, E. (2019). Sports, smartphones, and simulation as an engaging method to teach projectile motion incorporating air resistance. The Physics Teacher, 57(5), 308-311.

Baran, M., Baran, M., Karakoyun, F., & Maskan, A. (2021). The influence of project-based STEM (PjbL-STEM) applications on the development of 21st century skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 798-815.

Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., Kin-nebrew, J. S., & Clark, D. (2016). Identifying middle school students’ challenges in computational thinking-based science learning. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 11(1), 1–35.

Bilgin, C. U., & Gul, A. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of gamification on group cohesion, attitude, and academic achievement in collaborative learning environments. TechTrends, 64(1), 124-136.

Brassler, M., & Dettmers, J. (2017). How to enhance interdisciplinary competence—interdisciplinary problem-based learning versus interdisciplinary project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 1-15.

Brotosiswojo, B.S. (2001). Hakekat Pembelajaran MIPA dan Kiat Pembelajaran Kimia di Perguruan Tinggi. PAU-PPAI.

Brown, B. A., Boda, P., Lemmi, C., & Monroe, X. (2019). Moving culturally relevant pedagogy from theory to practice: Exploring teachers’ application of culturally relevant education in science and mathematics. Urban Education, 54(6), 775–803.

Büchler, J. P., Brüggelambert, G., de Haan-Cao, H. H., Sherlock, R., & Savaneviçiené, A. (2021). Towards an integrated case method in management education—developing an ecosystem-based research and learning journey for flipped classrooms. Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 113

.Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2020). Development of the teacher digital competence validation of DigCompEdu check-in questionnaire in the university context of Andalusia (Spain). Sustainability, 12(15), 6094.

Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Examining the relationship between school principals’ instruction-al leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy. International journal of educational management, 32(4), 550-567.

Goldhammer, F., Gniewosz, G., & Zylka, J. (2016). ICT engagement in learning environments. Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective, 331-351.

Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., Huang, G. C., Serrano, K. J., Rice, E. L., Tsakraklides, S. P., & Fiore, S. M. (2018). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American psychologist, 73(4), 532.

Hasanah, U., Astra, I., & Sumantri, M. S. (2023). Exploring the Need for Using Science Learning Multimedia to Improve Critical Thinking Elementary School Students: Teacher Perception. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 417-440.

Hargie, O. (2021). Skilled interpersonal communication: Research, theory and practice. Routledge.

Hart, S. L., Steinheider, B., & Hoffmeister, V. E. (2019). Team-based learning and training transfer: A case study of training for the implementation of enterprise resources planning software. International Journal of Training and Development, 23(2), 135-152.

Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C. A., & McGovern, M. (2020). Competencies for Industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14, 1511-1524.

Huang, Y. (2022). Effectiveness of inquiry-based science laboratories for improving teamwork and problem-solving skills and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(3), 329–357.

Hunt, K. J., Richardson, A., Darlington, A. S. E., & Addington-Hall, J. M. (2019). Developing the methods and questionnaire (VOICES-SF) for a national retrospective mortality follow-back survey of palliative and end-of-life care in England. BMJ supportive & palliative care, 9(1), e5-e5.

Isdianti, M., Nasrudin, H., & Erman, E. (2021). The effectiveness of STEM based inquiry learning packages to improving students’ critical thinking skill. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(3), 223-232.

Ito, H., & Takeuchi, S. (2021). Instructors’ understanding, practices, and issues regarding the use of the case method in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(2), 211–225

.Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1–26.

Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Salonen, V., Salmela-Aro, K., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2021). A teacher-researcher partnership for professional learning: Co-designing project-based learning units to increase student engagement in science classes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 625-641.

Kaps, A., & Stallmach, F. (2021). Smart physics to create kinematic data from GPS measurements. Physics Education, 56(6), 063004.

Karan, E., & Brown, L. (2022). Enhancing Student’s Problem-Solving Skills through Project-Based Learning. Journal of Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 74-87.

Khasawneh, M. (2024). Beyond digital platforms: Gamified skill development in real-world scenarios and environmental variables. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 213-220.

Khasawneh, Y. J. A., Alsarayreh, R., Al Ajlouni, A. A., Eyadat, H. M., Ayasrah, M. N., & Kha-sawneh, M. A. S. (2023). An Examination of Teacher Collaboration in Professional Learning Communities and Collaborative Teaching Practices. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 10(3), 446-452.

Koulouri, T., Lauria, S., & Macredie, R. D. (2014). Teaching introductory programming: A quantitative evaluation of different approaches. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(4), 1–28.

Lopez, V., & Hernandez, M. I. (2015). Scratch as a computational modelling tool for teaching physics. Physics Education, 50(3), 310–316.Nofrion, N. (2022). Penerapan Case Method dan Team Based Project dalam pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Kepala Pusat Pengembangan Pembelajaran, LP3M, UNP.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The nature and functions of critical & creative thinking. Rowman & Littlefield. Peng, Y., Pei, C., Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, K., Zheng, Z., & Zhu, P. (2020). A cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitude and practice associated with COVID-19 among undergraduate students in China. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1-8.

Purwanto, M. B., Hartono, R., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Essential skills challenges for the 21st century graduates: Creating a generation of high-level competence in the industrial revolution 4.0 era. Asian Journal of Applied Education (AJAE), 2(3), 279-292.

Rahayu, K. P. (2020). Penerapan Metode Kasus Terha-dap Hasil Belajar Pada Materi KSP. Jurnal Teladan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 89-96.Retnowati, S., & Subanti, S. (2020). The STEM Approach: The Development of Rectangular Module to Improve Critical Thinking Skill. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(1), 2-15.

Ritter, S. M., Gu, X., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training pro-gram. PLoS One, 15(3), e0229773.

Scholz, M., Kraus, P., & Franke, J. (2020). Development and implementation of a software layer for generic skill descriptions of versatile autonomous vehicles. Procedia CIRP, 88, 203-208.Servant-Miklos, V. (2020). Problem-oriented project work and problem-based learning:” Mind the gap!”. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1), 1-17.

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education 3-13, 43(1), 5-14.

Strzys, M. P., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Klein, P., Lukow-icz, P., Knierim, P., ... & Kuhn, J. (2018). Physics holo. lab learning experience: using smart-glasses for augmented reality labwork to foster the concepts of heat conduction. European Journal of Physics, 39(3), 035703.

Stylinski, C. D., Peterman, K., Phillips, T., Linhart, J., & Becker-Klein, R. (2020). Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: a snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(1), 77-92.

Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268-286.

Taufiq, M., Nuswowati, M., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2021a). Study of the Applicability Level of Merge Cube Augmented Reality Media on Junior High School Science Teachers. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(3).

Taufiq, M., Nuswowati, M., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2021b). Feasibility study of a solar system learning media based on merge cube augmented reality to embedding problem-solving skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1918, No. 5, p. 052064). IOP Publishing.

Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational technology research and development, 65, 555-575.

Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., Van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 508-555.

Veselov, G. E., Pljonkin, A. P., & Fedotova, A. Y. (2019, June). Project-based learning as an effective method in education. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Modern Educational Technology (pp. 54-57).

Vidak, A., Šapiç, I. M., & Mešiç, V. (2021). An augmented reality approach to learning about the force of gravity. Physics Education, 56(6), 065026

.Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-33.

Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88-95.

Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65-S71.

Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Reeves, T. C., & Coster, D. C. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Education, 79, 101–115.Wang,

M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational psychology review, 28(2), 315-352.

Wibowo, F. C. (2023). Effects of Augmented Reality Integration (ARI) Based Model Physics Independent Learning (MPIL) for Facilitating 21st-Century Skills (21-Cs). Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 178-192.

Widyaningsih, S. W., & Yusuf, I. (2020). Implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Assisted by E-Learning through Lesson Study Activities to Improve the Quality of Learning in Physics Learning Planning Courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 60-68.

Wijaya, K., Siregar, S., Sutrisno, S., Yuzni, S. Z., Sari, R. A., & Idris, I. (2021). Pembelajaran Metode Team-Base Project Menggunakan Product Oriented Module. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Xue, H., Yuan, H., Li, G., Liu, J., & Zhang, X. (2021). Comparison of team-based learning vs. lecture-based teaching with small group discussion in a master’s degree in nursing education course. Nurse Education Today, 105, 105043.

Yew, E. H., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning. Health professions education, 2(2), 75–79.

Zhao, W., He, L., Deng, W., Zhu, J., Su, A., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1–10.

Downloads

Article ID

4118

Published

2024-08-28

How to Cite

Taufiq, M., Kaniawati, I., Liliasari, L., Kulthida Nugultham, & Hyung-Yong Park. (2024). The Readiness and Constraints of Technological Integration in Implementing the Case Method and Team-Based Projects in the Mechanics Course. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/dw5h5588