The Executorial Power of the Stipulation on The Division of Joint Property Based on a Peace Agreement In a Divorce Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v20i1.15998Keywords:
Executorial Power, Transfer of Land Rights, Peace AgreementAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the executorial power of the verdict regarding the division of joint property on the basis of a peace agreement as outlined in a divorce verdict in the Religious Court, the differences in views between the Judges of the Banjar City Religious Court in West Java and the Head of the Banjar City Land Office in West Java regarding the executorial power in the peace agreement as outlined in divorce verdict number 722/Pdt.G/2020/PA/Bjr, and solutions to the differences in views regarding the executorial power in divorce verdict number 722/Pdt.G/2020/PA/Bjr. This type of research is empirical normative research. Data obtained based on library data research, namely primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, then continued with primary data. The collected data is analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results showed that the executorial power in divorce verdict number 722/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bjr is in the irah-irah which reads “For the Sake of Justice Based on God Almighty”. The decision is condemnatory or punishment imposed on the applicant and respondent to implement the peace agreement. The transfer of land rights based on a court decision can be carried out based on the provisions of Article 55 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 or using a grant deed provided that the clause contains a peace agreement resulting from the mediation on November 30, 2020.
References
References
Arivan Amir, “Pengalihan Hak Penguasaan Tanah Menurut UUPA Dalam Rangka Pendaftaran Tanah Pertama Kali”, Jurnal Repertorium, Vol. 8 (Mei, 2019), 51-65, http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v8i1.311
Dapahari, Brenda Velbi, “Kualitas Pelayanan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Bitung Dalam Pembuatan Sertifikat Tanah”, Jurnal Politico : Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Vol. 8, (Juli, 2019), https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/politico/article/view/32147.
Finallisa, Widhi Handoko, Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo, “Pelaksanaan Putusan Yang Bersifat Condemnatoir Dalam Perkara Pemabgian Harta Bersama (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Kudus”, Jurnal Notarius, Vol. 13, 335-371, (May 2020), https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.30468.
Harahap, Yahya, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Iftitah, Addien, “Kewenangan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Dalam Membuat Akta Jual Beli Tanah Beserta Akibat Hukumnya”, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol. 2, (2014), https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/6158.
Khairandy, Ridwan, “Landasan Filosofis Kekuatan Mengikatnya Kontrak”, Jurnal Hukum Edisi Khusus. Vol. 18, (Oktober 2011), 36-55; https://Journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/7232.
Kurniaki, Danar Fiscusia, “Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan” Fiat Justitia, No.3 (Juli-September 2016) 413-568, http://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/fiat.
Mahardhita, Gempur, “Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Harta Bersama Di Pengadilan Agama”, Jurnal An Nawawi : Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam, Vol. 1, (2021) 121-144, https://doi.org/10.55252/annawawi.v1i2.15.
Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Admisistrasi Pengadilan, Buku II, MA RI, Jakarta, 1994.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kota Banjar Provinsi Jawa Barat, Nomor 722/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bjr, Perihal Perkara Perceraian, 10 Desember 2020.
Rahmadhani, Nurlaili Azizah, Edy Wahjuningati, “Problematika Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dasar Jual Beli Di Bawah Tangan Pada Sertifikat Hak Milik Nomor 11949 Di Kelurahan Sidosemo Kota Surabaya”, Jurnal Hukum Keadilan, Vol. 13 (Juli, 2024), 56-69, https://doi.org/10.56943/judiciary.vl3il.239.
Rahman, Arif, Sofyan, Mulham Jati Aksi, “Hakim Peradilan Agama : Refleksi Sistem Pengangkatam dan Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, Vol. 20, 79-98, (Juli 2022), https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v20i1.2780.
Santoso, Urip, Pendaftaram Dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta; Prenada Media, 2008.
Sartika, Maya, “Kedudukan Putusan Pengadilan Yang Sudah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Dalam Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah”, Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 2, (2019), https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v2i1.138.
Sarwono, Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Setiawan, I Ketut Okta, Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah dan Hak Tanggungan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Sugeng, Bambang, dan Sujayadi, Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Dokumen Litigasi Perkara Perdata, Jakarta; Kencana, 2011.
Surat Fatwa Pengadilan Agama Kota Banjar Jawa Barat Nomor 2205/KPA.W10-A25/HK.05/IX/2023 Perihal Jawaban Permohonan Pendapat Hukum atas Saudara Al Furqan, Jawaban Surat Nomor 388/32/79.UP.02/VIII/2023, 18 September 2023.
Surat Kantor Pertanahan Kota Banjar Jawa Barat Nomor 436/32.79.UP.02/IX/2023 Perihal Permohonan Pendapat Hukum atas Surat Saudara Al Furqan, Jawaban Surat Nomor 388/32/79.UP.02/VIII/2023, 06 September 2023.
Surat Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Kota Banjar Jawa Barat Perihal Permohonan Pendapat Hukum Atas Surat Saudara Al Furqan, Jawaban Surat Nomor 388/32/79.UP.02/VIII/2023, 25 Agustus 2023.
Susanto, Happy, Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Saat Terjadi Perceraian, Jakarta; Transmedia Pustaka, 2008.
Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimentri, Jakarta; Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.
Sutedi, Adrian, Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta; Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Tim Peneliti STPN 2024, Asas-Asas Keagrariaan Menurut Kembali Riwayat Kelembagaan Agraria, Dasar Keilmuan Agraria Dan Asas Hubungan Keagrariaan di Indonesia, Yogyakarta; STPN Press, 2015.
Usman, Rachmadi, Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dalam Teori Dan Praktik, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
15998Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hartini Hartini, Ravilka Yustitia Ismail (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
