Indonesia's Accountability as a State That Did Not Ratify the 1951 Refugee Convention on the Rohingya Ethnic Group in the Perspective of International Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.6680Keywords:
responsibility, rohingya, Convention, Human Rights, stateAbstract
of Rohingya ethnic refugees who come to Indonesia where Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention so that it poses its own challenges in dealing with Rohingya refugees, so human rights aspects and various moral and empathetic efforts are still needed. The study uses a normative legal approach to analyze legal frameworks relevant to the Rohingya ethnic situation, highlighting the human rights protections provided by international legal instruments such as the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The ongoing conflict in Myanmar shows the allegations/assumptions of systematic human rights violations, showing the need for joint action in upholding human rights principles. Although Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention, the state has a moral and legal obligation to respect human rights, including in addressing the problem of the arrival of the Rohingya in terms of seeking asylum and shelter. The protection of refugees, including the Rohingya, is a fundamental moral and legal responsibility of the international community, which includes the Indonesian government. The Indonesian government has also taken steps to provide protection to refugees, including working with UNHCR in finding solutions for Rohingya refugees in Aceh. In the absence of Indonesia ratifying the refugee convention, moral and legal efforts are still needed to ensure proper protection for Rohingya refugees and uphold human rights principles at the international level.
References
Aling, Denise Maureen Rebecca. “Analisis Yuridis Krisis Pengungsi Rohingya di Aceh dan Peran UNHCR di Indonesia Berdasarkan Hukum Organisasi Internasional.” Lex Privatum 14, no. 3 (2024):1-12.
Azhari, Sri Muliana, and Heru Susetyo. “Perbandingan Kebijakan Indonesia dan Malaysia Mengenai Pemberian Hak Untuk Bekerja.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 8743–8755. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1761.
Christyanti, B Lora. “Jus Cogens Sebagai Dasar Mengikatnya Hukum Internasional.” Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 5, no. 2 (2022): 196–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v5i2.14611.
Fikri, Ahmad Ali, and Jihan Mayola. “Respon Indonesia Terhadap Krisis Pengungsi Rohingya Periode 2022-2023.” Emerald: Journal of Economics and Social Sciences 3, no. 2 (2024): 51–64.
Fitri, Icha Rachma Mutiara, Jehan Irianti Bekti Yepese, and Mochamad Gozzi Arofah. “Prinsip Non-Refoulement Penanganan Pengungsi dan Relevansinya dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Selektif Keimigrasian.” Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi 24, no. 1 (2024): 143–149. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v24i1.4609.
Gunakaya, A Widiada. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Penerbit Andi, 2019.
Hardiago, David, Rani Fadila Syafrinaldi, and Nunung Rahmania. “Money Politic dan Delik Politik: Studi Relasi Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Ekstradisi dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Unizar Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 77–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36679/ulr.v7i1.69.
Hasnda, Nuchraha Alhuda. “Krisis Pengungsi: Normatif Dan Praktis Penanganan Pengungsi Masyarakat Etnis Rohingya Myanmar di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 5, no. 3 (2023): 1–13.
Hayer, Karel Neju, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, and Wilshen Leatemia. “Pelindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konflik Bersenjata Non Internasional di Myanmar.” PATTIMURA Law Study Review 2, no. 1 (2024): 43–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v2i1.13693.
Herlambang, Nurma Chrismawantika, and Rizqullah Rafif Ananda. “Diskriminasi Kebebasan Beragama Kasus Perusakan Masjid Ahmadiyah di Sintang.” In Seminar Nasional-Kota Ramah Hak Asasi Manusia, 3: 9–19, 2023.
Holmes, Kim R. "What Is National Security?". Index of U.S. Military Strength. The Heritage Foundation. 2015.
Ichsano, Alghifari, Anisa Mayangsari, Najla Nayla, Rafaela Christcanti, Syaffa Fathimatuz Zahra, And Mochamad Whilky Rizkyanfi. “Bahasa Indonesia dan Resiliensi Psikologis: Peran Bahasa Meningkatkan Ketahanan Mental Individu dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Hidup.” PAEDAGOGY: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi 4, no. 2 (2024): 206–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v4i2.3138.
Juanda, Enju. “Eksistensi Hak Asasi Manusia dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Atas Pelanggarannya dalam Negara Hukum Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 8, no. 1 (2020): 98–108.
Julianthy, Evlyn Martha. Kebijakan Kriminal Terhadap Penyelundupan Manusia. Penerbit Enam Media, 2020.
Mahmudah, Husnatul, Didik Suhariyanto, Rahma Melisha Fajrina, Elwidarifa Marwenny, Liza Husnita, Ranti Nazmi, Muhammad Ridha Iswardhana, Sry Wahyuni, and Helfira Citra. PENGANTAR KEWARGANEGARAAN: Membentuk Warga Negara Yang Berkualitas. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
Nisrina, Rona Nada, and Fatma Ulfatun Najicha. “Analisis Hukum Status Kewarganegaraan Rohingya: Implikasi Kebijakan dan Tantangan Global.” Antropocene: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Humaniora 4, no. 2 (2024): 37–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56393/antropocene.v4i2.2443.
Nurkumalawati, Intan. “Pemeriksaan Keimigrasian: Pelayanan Publik yang Bukan Sekadar Melayani”. Dinamika Keimigrasian di Indonesia 97 (2020).
Pattihua, Ahmat Reza Fahlefi. “Efektivitas Asean Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) dalam Mengatasi HAM di Asia Tenggara.” URECOL, 2017, 513–30.
Primadasa, Cipta Primadasa, Mahendra Putra Kurnia, and Rika Erawaty. “Problematika Penanganan Pengungsi di Indonesia dari Perspektif Hukum Pengungsi Internasional.” Risalah Hukum, 2021, 44–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v17i1.380.
Riady, Pande Made Handika. “Penanganan Pengungsi dalam Perspektif Hukum Keimigrasian di Provinsi Kepulauan Riau.” Journal of Law and Policy Transformation 3, no. 1 (2018): 121–160.
Sahad, Indri Yulia, Popi Tuhulele, and Welly Angela Riry. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia ditinjau dari Hukum Internasional.” PATTIMURA Law Study Review 2, no. 1 (2024): 24–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v2i1.13691.
Setiani, Revina Putri, Asep Setiawan, Djoni Gunanto, and Cecep Effendi. “Peran Organisasi Kerjasama Islam (OKI) dalam Menangani Konflik Rohingya di Myanmar Tahun 2016–2017.” Journal of Comprehensive Science (JCS) 3, no. 9 (2024): 4233–4250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v3i9.832.
Sujatmoko, Andrey. Hukum HAM dan Hukum Humaniter. Rajawali Pers, 2016.
Sumampouw, Wuri, Kana Kurnia, Nur Arfiani, and Reza Hadrian. “Keberlakuan Non-Refoulement Principle dikaitkan dengan Sovereignty Principle: Tinjauan Terhadap Pengungsi Rohingya di Indonesia.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 7, no. 3 (2024): 1111–1133. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.9441.
Syahrin, M Alvi, and Setiawan Saputra. “Tindakan Hukum Terhadap Orang Asing Mantan Narapidana yang Memiliki Kartu Pengungsi UNHCR dalam Perspektif Keimigrasian.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 13, no. 2 (2019): 139–164.
Tampilang, Shania Regina, Devy K G Sondakh, and Natalia Lengkong. “Perekrutan Tentara Anak dalam Konflik Bersenjata Sebagai Kejahatan Perang Menurut Hukum Humaniter Internasional.” Lex Privatum 13, no. 1 (2024).
Thariq, Ananta Aqiel. “Dilema Kejahatan Internasional dalam Krisis Pengungsi: Tantangan Bagi Keamanan Global.” Organized Crime, 2023, 47.
Widodo, Joko. “Kebijakan Luar Negeri Indonesia Di Bawah Pemerintahan,” n.d.
Zaetama, Muhammad Kurnia. “Peran Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Sosial Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik| E-ISSN: 3031-8882 2, no. 1 (2024): 450–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62379/k6skmp76.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Lukman Hadi, Kholifatul Muna, Fanisa Mayda Ayiliani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
