Philosophical Discourse Relationship Articles 1 and 2 of the National Criminal Code, Such as Relationship of Human Body and Soul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.9076Keywords:
National Criminal Code, Relasi, Ontology, HumanAbstract
KUHP is the result of a critical breakthrough for the Indonesian nation. What is interesting point about the National Criminal Code is that it accommodates the principle of material legality in addition to the principle of formal legality. The arrangement of the quo principle is assumed to be similar to the reality of the relationship between the human body and soul. This article wants to discuss philosophically and conceptually 4 main things related to the reality of the Legality Principles of the Indonesian National Criminal Code. First, discuss the concept of philosophical presuppositions regarding the relationship between Articles 1 and 2 of the National Criminal Code and the relationship between body and soul in human reality according to several philosophers. Second: discuss the basic ontological reality of Article 1 of the National Criminal Code. Third: discuss the basic ontological reality of Article 2 of the National Criminal Code. Fourth: discuss the philosophical relationship between the two provisions of Article a quo. This research is normative legal research with a philosophical and legal approach. The results of the research show: First: the concept of philosophers' thinking, which in its essence really emphasizes the element of human unity as a complete reality composed of soul and body. Second: in ontological reality, the provisions of Article 1 of the Indonesian Criminal Code are laws and are a logical risk of modern law (legal positivism) which prioritizes the reality of visible and objective phenomena. Third: that in ontology the provisions of article 2 of the Indonesian Criminal Code are anthropological facts of the Indonesian people themselves starting from the journey of civilization, Pancasila as the basis of philosophy, the source of all sources of law, and the 1945 Constitution as the source of legal order (normative constitution). Fourth: the form of philosophical relationship between the two a quo provisions appears in the juridical, moral, and sociological synthesis of the new Indonesian Criminal Code.
References
Abidin, Andi Zainal &Andi Hamzah. Pengantar dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. cet I, Jakarta: Yarsif Watampone, 2010
Aburaera, Sukarno, et al. Filsafat Hukum Teori dan Praktik Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media Group,2015
Adlhiyati, Zakki and Harjono," The Virtue of Morality: A Comparative Study Indonesia and England" Pandecta Research Law Journal, Vol.18, No. 2, (December 2023):173-194 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v18i2.47765
Ali, Mahrus, 2017. “Pemetaan Tesis dalam Aliran-Aliran Filsafat Hukum dan Konsekuensi Metodologisnya” Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum 2 Vol. 24 (April): 213-231 http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art3
Ali, Mahrus. dan Muhammad Abdul Kholiq, “Adopsi Nilai dan Prinsip Hukum Pidana Islam tentang Delik Kesusilaan Zina dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Nasional”, Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum No. 3 Vol. 30 (September 2023): 622 – 649 https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss3.art8
Aquinas, T. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of The English Dominican Province, Ohio: Benziger Bros, Edition,1947 http://dhspriory.org/thomas/english/summa/index.html
Aryati, A. 2018. “Memahami Manusia Melalui Dimensi Filsafat (Upaya Memahami Eksistensi Manusia).” Jurnal El-Afkar, Vol. 7 No. II, (Juli- Desember 2018):79-94 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/jpkth.v7i2.1602
Ata Ujan, Andrea Membangun Hukum Membela Keadilan. Jogjakarta, Kanisius, 2017
Bagus, Lorens. Metafisika. Gramedia. Gramedia, Jakarta, 1991
Barnes, Jonathan (Editor). Complete Works of Aristotle Volume 2, USA New Jersey: Princeton University Press,1984
Bertens, K. Sejarah Filsafat Yunani. Jakarta: Gramedia,2018
Candra Irawatu, Arista. 2019. “Politik Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (RUU KUHP Asas Legalitas)”. Jurnal Adil Indonesia 2 No.1, (Juli):1-12 unw.ac.id/index.php/AIJ/issue/view/52
Dahler, Franz & Julius Chandra. Asal dan Tujuan Manusia, Jogjakarta: Kanisius, 1971
Fadlilah, Nabiel, (et all) 2022. “Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Pertentangan Hukum Yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, 2 (Desember):505-514 Doi: https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.1790
George Fletcher, P. Basic Concepts of Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998 https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/books/79
Huijbers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah cetakan ke 20, Jogjakarta: Kanisius, 2018
Leahly S. Louis, David, Idi Subandy Ibrahim. Siapakah Manusia? Jogjakarta: Kanisius, 2001
Made W.P.I. “Ideologi Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Tujuan Pemidanaan Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional” Jurnal Vyavahara Duta: Volume Xvii, No.1, (April 2022), 2614-5162 https://doi.org/10.25078/vd.v16i2.2911
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi Cetakan ke XIV. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group,2019
Manan, Bagir. “Peranan Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan”. Makalah pada Penataran Nasional Hukum Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanudin 1998
Mangunharjana, A. Yang Ceria dan Bahagia, Jogjarta:Kanisius, 2002
Naskah akademik KUHP Indonesia Jakarta: BPHN KEMENKUMHAM 2022
Nurdin, F.S. 2016. “Rekonstruski Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan”. Jurnal Refleksi Hukum 1. No. 1 (Desember):1-14 DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2016.v1.i1.p1-14
Peursen, C.A.van, (Alih Bahasa K. Bertens). Tubuh-Jiwa-Roh: Sebuah Pengantar Dalam Filsafat Manusia. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia,1991
Prasetyo, Teguh. dan Abdul Halim Barkatullah. “Filsafat, Teori dan Ilmu Hukum, Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat berkeadilan dan Bermartabat”. cetakan ke V, Jakarta:Rajawali Press 2017
Rasjidi Lili, & B. Arif Sidharta. Filsafat Hukum Mazhab dan Refleksinya. Remaja Rosda Karya: Bandung, 1999
Renggong, Ruslan. Hukum Pidana Khusus Memahami Delik-Delik Diluar KUHP Jakarta:Prenada Media Group,2016
Riyanto.A.F.X.(et all). Kearifan Lokal - Pancasila: Butir-Butir Filsafat Keindonesiaan. Jogjakarta: Kanisius, 2023
Ross, William David. The Work of Aristotle. London: Methuen & Co.LTD, 2020
Saida, F.H. Mac Thi Hoai Thuong, Ratna Deliana Erawati,2023. “The Orientation and Implications of New Criminal Code: An Analysis of Lawrence Friedman’s Legal System”. Jurnal IUS Kajian HUkum dan Keadilan 11, No.1. (April):114 Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1169
Saifuddin, A. (et all). 2019 “Ilmu Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Islam (Science in Perspective of Islamic Philosophy)” Ewha Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 35, No. 1, (Maret)):1-14 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3549062
Sandur, Simplisius. Etika Kebahagiaan Fondasi Filosofis Etika Thomas Aquinas. Jogjakarta: Kanisius, 2019
Santoso (et al). 2020. “Harmonisasi Al-Ruh, Al-Nafs, Dan Al-Hawa Dalam Psiklogi Islam” Jurnal Jurnal Islamika, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Mei, 2020): 170—181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37859/jsi.v3i1.1899
Saverius Nurdin, Fransiskus. 2020. “Kontra antara Legem dan Ius pada Peristiwa Bom Bali I.” Jurnal Hukum Positum 5. No 1, (Juni 2020): 100–123. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v5i1.3521
Saverius Nurdin, Fransiskus. 2022. “Diskursus Urgensi Sosiologi Hukum”. Jurnal Transformatif Unkriswina Sumba, 10, No. 2, (November):65-77 https://doi.org/10.58300/transformatif.v10i2.215
Setyawan, V. & Rhiti, H. 2022. “Relasi Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana Dan Pemikiran Hukum Alam”. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2, No.12, (Mei): 3813-3822 Doi: https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i12.1481
Sihotang, Kasdin. Filsafat Manusia, Usaha Membangkitkan Humanism, Jogjakarta: Kanisius, 2016
Sinaga. Erlina, Sharfina Sabila, 2019. “Politik Legislasi Hukum Tidak Tertulis Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Nasional,” Jurnal Recht Vinding Media Pembelajaran Hukum Nasional Vol 8, No 1, (April),1-18 http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i1.306
Soejanto Poespowardodjo.M.T dan Alexander Seran. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Hakikat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Kritik Terhadap Visi Positivisme Logis, Serta Implikasinya. Jakarta: Kompas, 2021
Sutedjo, Atmoredjo “Ideology Hukum Indonesia, Kajian tentang Pancasila dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum dan Dasar Negara Indonesia, (Jogjakarta: Lingkar Merdeka, 2016)
Suwandoko (et.al), 2022. “Legal Humanism Based on Local Wisdom: Progressive Legal Development Study in Magelang”, Jurnal Pandecta 17. No 2, (December 2022): 229-236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i2.36870
Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia (KUHP)
Wahyuninsgih, E. 2014. “Urgensi Pembaharauan Hukum Pidana Materil Indonesia Berdasarkan Nilai-Nilai Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum I, No.1, (Januari –April):17-23 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v1i1.1457
Zainal Abidin. A. Hukum Pidana 1. cet II, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fransiskus Saverius Nurdin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
